Food Confectioners
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BRCB vs QSR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
BRCB vs QSR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Confectioners | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $248M | $27.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $200M | $9.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $869K | $955M |
| Gross Margin | 23.2% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 25.1% |
| Forward P/E | 46.8x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $138M | $17.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $1.16B |
Quick Verdict: BRCB vs QSR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRCB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 24.5%, EPS growth -288.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.32, current ratio 1.04x
- 24.5% revenue growth vs QSR's 12.2%
QSR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 3.1%
- 132.2% 10Y total return vs BRCB's -58.4%
- Beta 0.39, yield 3.1%, current ratio 0.98x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.5% revenue growth vs QSR's 12.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.5x vs 46.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.0% margin vs BRCB's 0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs BRCB's 2.32 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs BRCB's -58.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs BRCB's 0.3%, ROIC 8.2% vs 2.0% |
BRCB vs QSR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BRCB vs QSR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QSR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QSR is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.6B annually — 47.9x BRCB's $200M. QSR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRCB's 0.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $200M | $9.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $17M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $869,000 | $955M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$33M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +33.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +25.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +10.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.3% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +102.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BRCB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, QSR's 17.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BRCB's 20.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $248M | $27.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $358M | $43.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.81x | 33.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 46.78x | 19.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.57x | 17.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.24x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.86x | 7.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QSR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QSR delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $1 for BRCB. BRCB carries lower financial leverage with a 1.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QSR's 3.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QSR scores 6/9 vs BRCB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.32x | 3.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $110M | $16.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $138M | $17.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.63x | 3.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QSR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QSR five years ago would be worth $13,031 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,163 for BRCB. Over the past 12 months, QSR leads with a +20.3% total return vs BRCB's -58.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QSR at 6.0% vs BRCB's -25.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.6% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.4% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.4% | +19.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.4% | +30.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.4% | +132.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.3% | +6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
QSR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QSR is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BRCB's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QSR currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs BRCB's 37.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.32x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.40 | $81.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.30 | $61.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.7% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.9 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 472K | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
QSR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BRCB as "Buy" and QSR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 83.2% upside for BRCB (target: $21) vs 5.8% for QSR (target: $84). QSR is the only dividend payer here at 3.06% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $83.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | 0.0% |
QSR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BRCB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
BRCB vs QSR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRCB or QSR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (BRCB) is the stronger pick with 24. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 2% for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) offers the better valuation at 33. 7x trailing P/E (19. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. Class A Common Stock (BRCB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRCB or QSR?
On forward P/E, Restaurant Brands International Inc.
is actually cheaper at 19. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRCB or QSR?
Over the past 5 years, Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) delivered a total return of +30. 3%, compared to -58. 4% for Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. Class A Common Stock (BRCB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QSR returned +132. 2% versus BRCB's -58. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRCB or QSR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. Class A Common Stock's 2. 32β — meaning BRCB is approximately 492% more volatile than QSR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. Class A Common Stock (BRCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 132% versus 3% for Restaurant Brands International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BRCB or QSR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (BRCB) is pulling ahead at 24. 5% versus 12. 2% for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Restaurant Brands International Inc. grew EPS -26. 1% year-over-year, compared to -288. 0% for Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. Class A Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BRCB or QSR?
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 2% net margin versus -8. 2% for Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. Class A Common Stock — meaning it keeps 8. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QSR leads at 23. 7% versus 2. 6% for BRCB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QSR leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BRCB or QSR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) trades at 19. 5x forward P/E versus 46. 8x for Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. Class A Common Stock — 27. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRCB: 83. 2% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BRCB or QSR?
In this comparison, QSR (3.
1% yield) pays a dividend. BRCB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BRCB or QSR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 3. 1% yield, +132. 2% 10Y return). Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc. Class A Common Stock (BRCB) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QSR: +132. 2%, BRCB: -58. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BRCB and QSR?
These companies operate in different sectors (BRCB (Consumer Defensive) and QSR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BRCB is a small-cap high-growth stock; QSR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. QSR pays a dividend while BRCB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.