Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BRID vs WMT vs SYY vs TGT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Food Distribution
Discount Stores
BRID vs WMT vs SYY vs TGT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail | Food Distribution | Discount Stores |
| Market Cap | $71M | $1.04T | $34.91B | $57.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $227M | $703.06B | $83.57B | $106.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $22.91B | $1.74B | $4.04B |
| Gross Margin | 23.3% | 24.9% | 18.5% | 27.3% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | 4.1% | 3.6% | 5.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.8x | 15.8x | 15.7x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $67.09B | $14.49B | $5.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $10.73B | $1.07B | $5.49B |
BRID vs WMT vs SYY vs TGT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgford Foods Cor… (BRID) | 100 | 49.6 | -50.4% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 315.3 | +215.3% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 131.3 | +31.3% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 102.4 | +2.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRID vs WMT vs SYY vs TGT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRID lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs TGT's 99.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.29 vs WMT's 4.07
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
- Lower P/E (15.8x vs 44.8x), PEG 0.29 vs 4.07
TGT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.
- 3.8% margin vs BRID's -3.2%
- 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +36.6% vs BRID's -1.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs BRID's -11.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 44.8x), PEG 0.29 vs 4.07 | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs BRID's -3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs TGT's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.6% vs BRID's -1.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs BRID's -4.8%, ROIC 14.7% vs -3.8% |
BRID vs WMT vs SYY vs TGT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BRID vs WMT vs SYY vs TGT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGT leads in 1 of 6 categories
BRID leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • SYY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 3092.2x BRID's $227M. TGT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRID's -3.2%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $227M | $703.1B | $83.6B | $106.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $42.8B | $4.0B | $8.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $22.9B | $1.7B | $4.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $15.3B | $2.0B | $2.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +24.9% | +18.5% | +27.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +4.1% | +3.6% | +5.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +3.3% | +2.1% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +2.2% | +2.4% | +2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | +5.8% | +4.7% | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +35.1% | -13.4% | +23.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BRID leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, TGT trades at a 68% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.36x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $71M | $1.04T | $34.9B | $57.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $67M | $1.09T | $48.3B | $57.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.16x | 47.69x | 19.54x | 15.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.77x | 15.78x | 15.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x | 0.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 246.10x | 24.85x | 11.58x | 7.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 1.46x | 0.43x | 0.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 10.45x | 19.23x | 3.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.97x | 19.60x | 20.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BRID and TGT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-6 for BRID. BRID carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs BRID's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.0% | +22.3% | +80.7% | +26.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.8% | +7.9% | +6.4% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.8% | +14.7% | +15.7% | +16.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.3% | +17.5% | +19.0% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.67x | 7.81x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $56.4B | $13.4B | $104M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $10.7B | $1.1B | $5.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $67.1B | $14.5B | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -19.91x | 11.85x | 4.35x | 12.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,593 for BRID. Over the past 12 months, TGT leads with a +36.6% total return vs BRID's -1.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs BRID's -14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.5% | +15.7% | +1.9% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.4% | +32.7% | +6.4% | +36.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.0% | +160.5% | +4.0% | -11.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.1% | +186.9% | -3.9% | -31.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.8% | +499.5% | +82.2% | +99.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.7% | +37.6% | +1.3% | -3.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRID and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRID is the less volatile stock with a -0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGT's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs SYY's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 0.11x | 0.46x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.74 | $134.69 | $91.69 | $133.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.00 | $91.89 | $68.19 | $83.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.6% | +96.7% | +79.5% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 55.9 | 41.7 | 61.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 17.2M | 4.7M | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and SYY and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMT as "Buy", SYY as "Buy", TGT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.1% upside for SYY (target: $90) vs -8.3% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, TGT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.22 | $90.44 | $115.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 | 30 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +2.8% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 37 | 37 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $2.04 | $4.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +3.6% | +0.7% |
TGT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BRID leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
BRID vs WMT vs SYY vs TGT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRID or WMT or SYY or TGT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 1% for Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID). Target Corporation (TGT) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRID or WMT or SYY or TGT?
On trailing P/E, Target Corporation (TGT) is the cheapest at 15.
5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Target Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRID or WMT or SYY or TGT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -44. 1% for Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +501. 4% versus BRID's -37. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRID or WMT or SYY or TGT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Target Corporation's 0. 94β — meaning TGT is approximately -4507% more volatile than BRID relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BRID or WMT or SYY or TGT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -11. 1% for Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -197. 4% for Bridgford Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SYY leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BRID or WMT or SYY or TGT?
Target Corporation (TGT) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
5% net margin versus -1. 5% for Bridgford Foods Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGT leads at 4. 9% versus -2. 8% for BRID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGT leads at 27. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BRID or WMT or SYY or TGT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Target Corporation (TGT) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 8x for Walmart Inc. — 29. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYY: 24. 1% to $90. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — BRID or WMT or SYY or TGT?
In this comparison, TGT (3.
6% yield), SYY (2. 8% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. BRID does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BRID or WMT or SYY or TGT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11), 0. 7% yield, +501. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +501. 4%, TGT: +98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BRID and WMT and SYY and TGT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BRID is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock. WMT, SYY, TGT pay a dividend while BRID does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.