BRKR vs WAT vs TRMB vs FTV vs A

For growth investors, Waters Corporation (WAT) is the stronger pick with 7.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 5% for Fortive Corporation (FTV). Agilent Technologies, Inc. (A) offers the better valuation at 25. 8x trailing P/E (19. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bruker Corporation (BRKR) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Agilent Technologies, Inc.

(A) is the cheapest at 25. 8x versus Trimble Inc. at 36. 2x. On forward P/E, Agilent Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Agilent Technologies, Inc. wins at 1. 34x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 35x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Waters Corporation (WAT) delivered a total return of +13.

1%, compared to -36. 6% for Bruker Corporation (BRKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: A returned +202. 6% versus BRKR's +59. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fortive Corporation (FTV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

83β versus Bruker Corporation's 1. 59β — meaning BRKR is approximately 92% more volatile than FTV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 81% for Bruker Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Waters Corporation (WAT) is pulling ahead at 7.

0% versus -17. 5% for Fortive Corporation (FTV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agilent Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 3. 2% year-over-year, compared to -119. 7% for Bruker Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRKR leads at 10. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Waters Corporation (WAT) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

3% net margin versus -0. 3% for Bruker Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WAT leads at 28. 2% versus 6. 9% for BRKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Agilent Technologies, Inc. (A) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 34x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 35x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Agilent Technologies, Inc. (A) trades at 19. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Waters Corporation — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMB: 49. 8% to $95. 00.

In this comparison, A (0.

8% yield), FTV (0. 5% yield), BRKR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. WAT, TRMB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Agilent Technologies, Inc.

(A) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23), 0. 8% yield, +202. 6% 10Y return). Bruker Corporation (BRKR) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (A: +202. 6%, BRKR: +59. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (BRKR (Healthcare) and WAT (Healthcare) and TRMB (Technology) and FTV (Technology) and A (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

A pays a dividend while BRKR, WAT, TRMB, FTV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.