Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BRLS vs SMPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
BRLS vs SMPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $33M | $1.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28M | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 9.7% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | -46.0% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.6x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $304M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $653K | $98M |
BRLS vs SMPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Borealis Foods Inc. (BRLS) | 100 | 15.4 | -84.6% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 31.9 | -68.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRLS vs SMPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.21
- Rev growth 33.4%, EPS growth -7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.46x
SMPL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs BRLS's -84.4%
- 6.3% margin vs BRLS's -65.7%
- -65.1% vs BRLS's -73.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.4% revenue growth vs SMPL's 9.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs BRLS's -65.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs SMPL's 0.38 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -65.1% vs BRLS's -73.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs BRLS's -31.6%, ROIC 8.1% vs -62.0% |
BRLS vs SMPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BRLS vs SMPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 52.0x BRLS's $28M. SMPL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRLS's -65.7%. On growth, SMPL holds the edge at -0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +34.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -46.0% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -65.7% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.4% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.6% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.7% | -31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BRLS and SMPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $64M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.22x | 12.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.19x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL delivers a 5.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-4 for BRLS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMPL scores 5/9 vs BRLS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.7% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.6% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -62.0% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -83.0% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32M | $206M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $652,965 | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $304M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.28x | 6.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMPL five years ago would be worth $3,630 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,558 for BRLS. Over the past 12 months, SMPL leads with a -65.1% total return vs BRLS's -73.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMPL at -31.1% vs BRLS's -47.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.6% | -35.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.8% | -65.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.4% | -67.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | -63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | +5.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.4% | -31.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRLS and SMPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMPL's 0.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMPL currently trades 34.1% from its 52-week high vs BRLS's 21.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.05 | $36.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.60 | $10.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.7% | +34.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.6 | 44.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 292K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% |
SMPL leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
BRLS vs SMPL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRLS or SMPL a better buy right now?
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12.
4x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BRLS or SMPL?
Over the past 5 years, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) delivered a total return of -63.
7%, compared to -84. 4% for Borealis Foods Inc. (BRLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMPL returned +5. 3% versus BRLS's -84. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BRLS or SMPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Borealis Foods Inc.
(BRLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus The Simply Good Foods Company's 0. 38β — meaning SMPL is approximately 83% more volatile than BRLS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — BRLS or SMPL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Simply Good Foods Company grew EPS -26.
1% year-over-year, compared to -733. 3% for Borealis Foods Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRLS leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BRLS or SMPL?
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
1% net margin versus -91. 5% for Borealis Foods Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -73. 7% for BRLS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BRLS or SMPL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BRLS or SMPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Borealis Foods Inc.
(BRLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRLS: -84. 4%, SMPL: +5. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BRLS and SMPL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BRLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.