Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BRNS vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
BRNS vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $27M | $1712.35T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-52M | $-168M |
| Total Debt | $11M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $194M |
BRNS vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barinthus Biotherap… (BRNS) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 30.6 | -69.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRNS vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRNS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -100.0%, EPS growth -5.8%
- -100.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- 1.9% margin vs DBVT's 0.3%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26
- -87.0% 10Y total return vs BRNS's -95.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 3.67x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -100.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs BRNS's 1.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs BRNS's -32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -48.8% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
BRNS vs DBVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BRNS vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRNS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$52M | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$36M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.4% | +91.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BRNS and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27M | $1712.35T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$32M | $1712.35T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.41x | -0.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BRNS and DBVT each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BRNS delivers a -63.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-64 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRNS's 0.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DBVT scores 4/9 vs BRNS's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -63.8% | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.8% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -174.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -46.6% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$59M | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1808.55x | -189.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DBVT five years ago would be worth $3,090 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $495 for BRNS. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs BRNS's -32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs BRNS's -34.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.8% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -32.3% | +110.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.4% | +19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.0% | -69.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | -87.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.1% | +6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DBVT is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BRNS's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DBVT currently trades 76.3% from its 52-week high vs BRNS's 22.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.92 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.51 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.9% | +76.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.9 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 252K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DBVT leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
BRNS vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRNS or DBVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BRNS or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) delivered a total return of -69. 1%, compared to -95. 0% for Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc (BRNS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DBVT returned -87. 0% versus BRNS's -95. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BRNS or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc's 1. 28β — meaning BRNS is approximately 2% more volatile than DBVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 15% for Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BRNS or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc grew EPS -5.
8% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BRNS or DBVT?
Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc (BRNS) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRNS leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRNS leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BRNS or DBVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BRNS or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DBVT: -87. 0%, BRNS: -95. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BRNS and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.