Insurance - Brokers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BRO vs RYAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Specialty
BRO vs RYAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $19.77B | $4.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.42B | $3.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.15B | $132M |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 26.8% | 16.6% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $7.92B | $3.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.08B | $158M |
BRO vs RYAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) | 100 | 106.8 | +6.8% |
| Ryan Specialty Hold… (RYAN) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRO vs RYAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 27 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 26.6%, EPS growth -8.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.7%
- 253.0% 10Y total return vs RYAN's 20.0%
In this particular matchup, RYAN is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.6% revenue growth vs RYAN's 21.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 14.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs RYAN's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs RYAN's 0.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 27-year raise streak, vs RYAN's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -47.2% vs RYAN's -54.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs RYAN's 1.3%, ROIC 8.7% vs 10.8% |
BRO vs RYAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BRO vs RYAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.4B annually — 2.0x RYAN's $3.2B. BRO is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RYAN's 4.2%. On growth, BRO holds the edge at +37.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.4B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $743M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $132M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $555M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.4% | +69.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.8% | +16.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | +4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +17.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.3% | +15.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | +2.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BRO and RYAN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.4x trailing earnings, BRO trades at a 73% valuation discount to RYAN's 67.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RYAN's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BRO's 12.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.8B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26.6B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.38x | 67.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.83x | 14.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.91x | 8.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.32x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 7.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.31x | 7.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RYAN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RYAN delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $9 for BRO. BRO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RYAN's 2.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RYAN scores 6/9 vs BRO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.3% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.63x | 2.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.8B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $158M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.9B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.88x | 2.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BRO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RYAN five years ago would be worth $12,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,284 for BRO. Over the past 12 months, BRO leads with a -47.2% total return vs RYAN's -54.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BRO at -3.2% vs RYAN's -8.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.0% | -37.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.2% | -54.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.3% | -23.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.8% | +20.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +253.0% | +20.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.2% | -8.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BRO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRO is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RYAN's 0.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BRO currently trades 51.0% from its 52-week high vs RYAN's 43.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $113.84 | $72.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.46 | $29.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.0% | +43.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.0 | 28.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
BRO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BRO as "Hold" and RYAN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.4% upside for BRO (target: $89) vs 43.8% for RYAN (target: $46). For income investors, BRO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.07% vs RYAN's 0.71%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $88.50 | $45.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 27 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.62 | $0.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +0.1% |
BRO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). RYAN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
BRO vs RYAN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRO or RYAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brown & Brown, Inc.
(BRO) is the stronger pick with 26. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 3% for Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. (RYAN). Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) offers the better valuation at 18. 4x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. (RYAN) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRO or RYAN?
On trailing P/E, Brown & Brown, Inc.
(BRO) is the cheapest at 18. 4x versus Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. at 67. 5x. On forward P/E, Brown & Brown, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRO or RYAN?
Over the past 5 years, Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.
(RYAN) delivered a total return of +20. 0%, compared to +12. 8% for Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRO returned +253. 0% versus RYAN's +20. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRO or RYAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brown & Brown, Inc.
(BRO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 23β — meaning RYAN is approximately 218% more volatile than BRO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 3% for Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BRO or RYAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brown & Brown, Inc.
(BRO) is pulling ahead at 26. 6% versus 21. 3% for Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. (RYAN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brown & Brown, Inc. grew EPS -8. 7% year-over-year, compared to -33. 8% for Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RYAN leads at 20. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BRO or RYAN?
Brown & Brown, Inc.
(BRO) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 7% net margin versus 2. 1% for Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRO leads at 28. 5% versus 20. 5% for RYAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RYAN leads at 90. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BRO or RYAN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brown & Brown, Inc.
(BRO) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRO: 52. 4% to $88. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BRO or RYAN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 7% for Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. (RYAN).
09Is BRO or RYAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brown & Brown, Inc.
(BRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 1. 1% yield, +253. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRO: +253. 0%, RYAN: +20. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BRO and RYAN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.