Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BSAC vs BBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
BSAC vs BBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $14.85B | $40.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.66T | $342.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.05T | $23.21B |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 34.6% |
| Operating Margin | 26.7% | -1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 1.4x |
| Total Debt | $15.88T | $798.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.24T | $160.84B |
BSAC vs BBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Banco Santander-Chi… (BSAC) | 100 | 199.9 | +99.9% |
| Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD) | 100 | 135.0 | +35.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSAC vs BBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 100.0%
- 127.2% 10Y total return vs BBD's 62.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 0.21x
BBD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 37.1%, EPS growth 34.4%
- NIM 3.1% vs BSAC's 2.9%
- 37.1% NII/revenue growth vs BSAC's -5.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.1% NII/revenue growth vs BSAC's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 1.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BBD's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs BBD's 1.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BBD's 5.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.3% vs BSAC's +36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BBD's 0.4% |
BSAC vs BBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSAC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.66T annually — 13.6x BBD's $342.2B. BSAC is the more profitable business, keeping 21.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBD's 6.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.66T | $342.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.45T | -$1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.05T | $23.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $776.1B | -$201.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +34.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | -1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | -92.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.2% | +46.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BSAC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, BSAC trades at a 100% valuation discount to BBD's 8.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSAC offers better value at 0.00x vs BBD's 1.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.8B | $40.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26.6B | $169.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.03x | 8.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 1.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | 1.07x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.45x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 1.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.54x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSAC leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSAC delivers a 21.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $13 for BBD. BSAC carries lower financial leverage with a 2.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BBD's 4.46x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.5% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.77x | 4.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.64T | $637.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.24T | $160.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.88T | $798.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | -0.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BSAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSAC five years ago would be worth $15,931 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,042 for BBD. Over the past 12 months, BBD leads with a +75.3% total return vs BSAC's +36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSAC at 21.5% vs BBD's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.9% | +16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.8% | +75.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.4% | +48.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.3% | +20.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.2% | +62.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.5% | +14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BSAC and BBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBD's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BBD currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs BSAC's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.72 | $4.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.77 | $2.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.6% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.2 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 449K | 38.1M |
Analyst Outlook
BSAC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BSAC as "Hold" and BBD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.3% upside for BSAC (target: $34) vs -17.1% for BBD (target: $3). For income investors, BSAC offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs BBD's 5.87%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.50 | $3.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +5.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $484767.98 | $1.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
BSAC leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
BSAC vs BBD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSAC or BBD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Banco Bradesco S.
A. (BBD) is the stronger pick with 37. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC). Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSAC or BBD?
On trailing P/E, Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) is the cheapest at 0.
0x versus Banco Bradesco S. A. at 8. 7x. On forward P/E, Banco Santander-Chile is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSAC or BBD?
Over the past 5 years, Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) delivered a total return of +59.
3%, compared to +20. 4% for Banco Bradesco S. A. (BBD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSAC returned +127. 2% versus BBD's +62. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSAC or BBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
94β versus Banco Bradesco S. A. 's 1. 15β — meaning BBD is approximately 22% more volatile than BSAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 4% for Banco Bradesco S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BSAC or BBD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Banco Bradesco S.
A. (BBD) is pulling ahead at 37. 1% versus -5. 0% for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banco Santander-Chile grew EPS 492. 6% year-over-year, compared to 34. 4% for Banco Bradesco S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BSAC or BBD?
Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
9% net margin versus 6. 8% for Banco Bradesco S. A. — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSAC leads at 26. 7% versus -1. 1% for BBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BSAC leads at 48. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BSAC or BBD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) trades at 0.
0x forward P/E versus 1. 4x for Banco Bradesco S. A. — 1. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSAC: 6. 3% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BSAC or BBD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 5. 9% for Banco Bradesco S. A. (BBD).
09Is BSAC or BBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
94), 100. 0% yield, +127. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSAC: +127. 2%, BBD: +62. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BSAC and BBD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BSAC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BBD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.