Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BSET vs MHK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
BSET vs MHK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $123M | $6.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $331M | $10.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $414M |
| Gross Margin | 56.3% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $89M | $2.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $856M |
BSET vs MHK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bassett Furniture I… (BSET) | 100 | 222.7 | +122.7% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 110.2 | +10.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSET vs MHK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSET is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 5.6%
- Rev growth 1.6%, EPS growth 163.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.6%
- -22.8% 10Y total return vs MHK's -47.6%
MHK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 17.3x)
- 3.8% margin vs BSET's 2.3%
- +1.9% vs BSET's -13.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.6% revenue growth vs MHK's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 17.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs BSET's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs MHK's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 5.6% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.9% vs BSET's -13.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs BSET's 2.4%, ROIC 3.9% vs 2.6% |
BSET vs MHK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BSET vs MHK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MHK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MHK is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 33.2x BSET's $331M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.8% (MHK) to 2.3% (BSET).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $331M | $11.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $414M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $709M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.3% | +24.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | +8.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +117.8% | +65.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MHK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, MHK trades at a 15% valuation discount to BSET's 20.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MHK's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BSET's 21.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $123M | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $171M | $8.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.36x | 17.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.27x | 11.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.80x | 7.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.76x | 10.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSET leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MHK delivers a 5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $5 for BSET. MHK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BSET's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSET scores 7/9 vs MHK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $47M | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $856M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $89M | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 74.23x | 36.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BSET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSET five years ago would be worth $5,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,472 for MHK. Over the past 12 months, MHK leads with a +1.9% total return vs BSET's -13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSET at 4.7% vs MHK's 0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.9% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.3% | +1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.8% | +2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.6% | -55.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.8% | -47.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.7% | +0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BSET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSET is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MHK's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.75 | $143.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.17 | $93.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.2% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.7 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
BSET leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BSET as "Hold" and MHK as "Hold". BSET is the only dividend payer here at 5.59% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $130.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +2.4% |
BSET leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MHK leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
BSET vs MHK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSET or MHK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET) is the stronger pick with 1.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSET or MHK?
On trailing P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is the cheapest at 17. 3x versus Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSET or MHK?
Over the past 5 years, Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET) delivered a total return of -46.
6%, compared to -55. 3% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSET returned -22. 8% versus MHK's -47. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSET or MHK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus Mohawk Industries, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning MHK is approximately 286% more volatile than BSET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 54% for Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BSET or MHK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET) is pulling ahead at 1.
6% versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated grew EPS 163. 1% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Mohawk Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MHK leads at -2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BSET or MHK?
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus 1. 8% for Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MHK leads at 4. 7% versus 2. 3% for BSET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BSET leads at 56. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BSET or MHK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 17. 3x for Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated — 6. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — BSET or MHK?
In this comparison, BSET (5.
6% yield) pays a dividend. MHK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BSET or MHK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
35), 5. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSET: -22. 8%, MHK: -47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BSET and MHK?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BSET is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock. BSET pays a dividend while MHK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.