Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BSET vs MHK vs TILE vs LOW

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BSET
Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$123M
5Y Perf.+122.7%
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.29B
5Y Perf.+10.2%
TILE
Interface, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.59B
5Y Perf.+224.5%
LOW
Lowe's Companies, Inc.

Home Improvement

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$129.29B
5Y Perf.+77.1%

BSET vs MHK vs TILE vs LOW — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BSET logoBSET
MHK logoMHK
TILE logoTILE
LOW logoLOW
IndustryFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesHome Improvement
Market Cap$123M$6.29B$1.59B$129.29B
Revenue (TTM)$331M$10.99B$1.39B$86.29B
Net Income (TTM)$8M$414M$116M$6.65B
Gross Margin56.3%24.3%38.7%33.5%
Operating Margin1.9%4.9%11.8%11.8%
Forward P/E17.3x11.2x13.1x18.3x
Total Debt$89M$2.76B$265M$7.19B
Cash & Equiv.$41M$856M$71M$982M

BSET vs MHK vs TILE vs LOWLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BSET
MHK
TILE
LOW
StockMay 20May 26Return
Bassett Furniture I… (BSET)100222.7+122.7%
Mohawk Industries, … (MHK)100110.2+10.2%
Interface, Inc. (TILE)100324.5+224.5%
Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW)100177.1+77.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BSET vs MHK vs TILE vs LOW

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TILE leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. MHK and LOW also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BSET
Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated
The Income Pick

BSET is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 5.6%
  • Beta 0.35, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.89x
  • Beta 0.35 vs MHK's 1.34
  • 5.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LOW's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
The Value Play

MHK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (11.2x vs 18.3x)
Best for: value
TILE
Interface, Inc.
The Growth Play

TILE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 32.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 21.9%, current ratio 2.34x
  • 5.4% revenue growth vs MHK's -0.5%
  • 8.4% margin vs BSET's 2.3%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
LOW
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

LOW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 244.9% 10Y total return vs TILE's 74.9%
  • 12.3% ROA vs BSET's 2.4%, ROIC 76.2% vs 2.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTILE logoTILE5.4% revenue growth vs MHK's -0.5%
ValueMHK logoMHKLower P/E (11.2x vs 18.3x)
Quality / MarginsTILE logoTILE8.4% margin vs BSET's 2.3%
Stability / SafetyBSET logoBSETBeta 0.35 vs MHK's 1.34
DividendsBSET logoBSET5.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LOW's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TILE logoTILE+39.1% vs BSET's -13.3%
Efficiency (ROA)LOW logoLOW12.3% ROA vs BSET's 2.4%, ROIC 76.2% vs 2.6%

BSET vs MHK vs TILE vs LOW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BSETBassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated
FY 2025
Wholesale Segment
57.4%$139M
Retail Segment
42.6%$103M
MHKMohawk Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Global Ceramic Segment
43.5%$4.2B
Carpet And Resilient
38.5%$3.7B
Laminate and Wood
18.1%$1.8B
TILEInterface, Inc.
FY 2025
AMS
60.8%$844M
EAAA
39.2%$543M
LOWLowe's Companies, Inc.
FY 2024
Home Decor
36.9%$30.9B
Building Products
31.5%$26.4B
Hardlines
29.0%$24.3B
Other Sales
2.6%$2.2B

BSET vs MHK vs TILE vs LOW — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBSETLAGGINGLOW

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — BSET and TILE and LOW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

LOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $86.3B annually — 260.7x BSET's $331M. TILE is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BSET's 2.3%. On growth, LOW holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBSET logoBSETBassett Furniture…MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…TILE logoTILEInterface, Inc.LOW logoLOWLowe's Companies,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$331M$11.0B$1.4B$86.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$15M$1.2B$206M$12.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$8M$414M$116M$6.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$8M$709M$122M$7.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+56.3%+24.3%+38.7%+33.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.9%+4.9%+11.8%+11.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.3%+3.8%+8.4%+7.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.4%+6.5%+8.8%+8.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.9%+8.0%+4.3%+10.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+117.8%+65.2%+10.8%-11.0%
Evenly matched — BSET and TILE and LOW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MHK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.1x trailing earnings, TILE trades at a 31% valuation discount to BSET's 20.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MHK's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BSET's 21.8x.

MetricBSET logoBSETBassett Furniture…MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…TILE logoTILEInterface, Inc.LOW logoLOWLowe's Companies,…
Market CapShares × price$123M$6.3B$1.6B$129.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$171M$8.2B$1.8B$135.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.36x17.33x14.06x19.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.27x11.23x13.10x18.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.20x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.80x7.05x8.68x11.20x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.37x0.58x1.15x1.50x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.75x0.77x1.35x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.76x10.20x13.10x16.90x
MHK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BSET leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

TILE delivers a 9.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $5 for BSET. TILE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BSET's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSET scores 7/9 vs LOW's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBSET logoBSETBassett Furniture…MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…TILE logoTILEInterface, Inc.LOW logoLOWLowe's Companies,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.7%+5.0%+9.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.4%+3.0%+6.6%+12.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.6%+3.9%+11.3%+76.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.2%+4.8%+13.2%+33.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97666
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.54x0.33x0.22x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$47M$1.9B$193M$6.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$41M$856M$71M$982M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$89M$2.8B$265M$7.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense74.23x36.90x8.00x8.90x
BSET leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TILE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TILE five years ago would be worth $19,935 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,472 for MHK. Over the past 12 months, TILE leads with a +39.1% total return vs BSET's -13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TILE at 57.3% vs MHK's 0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBSET logoBSETBassett Furniture…MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…TILE logoTILEInterface, Inc.LOW logoLOWLowe's Companies,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-12.9%-6.2%-3.0%-5.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-13.3%+1.9%+39.1%+5.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+14.8%+2.9%+289.2%+19.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-46.6%-55.3%+99.4%+21.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-22.8%-47.6%+74.9%+244.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+4.7%+0.9%+57.3%+6.2%
TILE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BSET and LOW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BSET is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MHK's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOW currently trades 78.8% from its 52-week high vs MHK's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBSET logoBSETBassett Furniture…MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…TILE logoTILEInterface, Inc.LOW logoLOWLowe's Companies,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.35x1.34x1.00x0.86x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.75$143.13$35.11$293.06
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.17$93.60$18.74$210.33
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+72.2%+71.8%+78.5%+78.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.750.653.544.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded32K1.1M572K2.2M
Evenly matched — BSET and LOW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BSET and LOW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BSET as "Hold", MHK as "Hold", TILE as "Buy", LOW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.7% upside for TILE (target: $36) vs 24.8% for LOW (target: $288). For income investors, BSET offers the higher dividend yield at 5.59% vs TILE's 0.22%.

MetricBSET logoBSETBassett Furniture…MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…TILE logoTILEInterface, Inc.LOW logoLOWLowe's Companies,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$130.00$36.00$288.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts4321251
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.6%+0.2%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20116
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.80$0.06$4.71
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.7%+2.4%+1.1%+0.2%
Evenly matched — BSET and LOW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MHK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). BSET leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallBassett Furniture Industrie… (BSET)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BSET vs MHK vs TILE vs LOW: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BSET or MHK or TILE or LOW a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). Interface, Inc. (TILE) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Interface, Inc. (TILE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BSET or MHK or TILE or LOW?

On trailing P/E, Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is the cheapest at 14. 1x versus Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BSET or MHK or TILE or LOW?

Over the past 5 years, Interface, Inc.

(TILE) delivered a total return of +99. 4%, compared to -55. 3% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOW returned +244. 9% versus MHK's -47. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BSET or MHK or TILE or LOW?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

35β versus Mohawk Industries, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning MHK is approximately 286% more volatile than BSET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interface, Inc. (TILE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 54% for Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BSET or MHK or TILE or LOW?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated grew EPS 163. 1% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Mohawk Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TILE leads at 2. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BSET or MHK or TILE or LOW?

Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus 1. 8% for Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TILE leads at 11. 8% versus 2. 3% for BSET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BSET leads at 56. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BSET or MHK or TILE or LOW more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 3x for Lowe's Companies, Inc. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TILE: 30. 7% to $36. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BSET or MHK or TILE or LOW?

In this comparison, BSET (5.

6% yield), LOW (2. 0% yield), TILE (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. MHK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BSET or MHK or TILE or LOW better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

35), 5. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSET: -22. 8%, MHK: -47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BSET and MHK and TILE and LOW?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BSET is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; TILE is a small-cap deep-value stock; LOW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BSET, LOW pay a dividend while MHK, TILE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BSET

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MHK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TILE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LOW

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BSET and MHK and TILE and LOW on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BSET: 5.9% · MHK: 8.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(BSET: 2.3% · MHK: 3.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BSET: 20.4x · MHK: 17.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.