Home Improvement
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LOW vs HD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
LOW vs HD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Home Improvement | Home Improvement |
| Market Cap | $130.68B | $321.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86.29B | $164.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.65B | $14.16B |
| Gross Margin | 33.5% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | 18.5x | 21.5x |
| Total Debt | $7.19B | $19.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $982M | $1.39B |
LOW vs HD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | 100 | 179.0 | +79.0% |
| The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) | 100 | 130.0 | +30.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOW vs HD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 249.6% 10Y total return vs HD's 185.4%
- PEG 2.09 vs HD's 6.02
- Lower P/E (18.5x vs 21.5x), PEG 2.09 vs 6.02
HD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth -4.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, current ratio 1.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.2% revenue growth vs LOW's 3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.5x vs 21.5x), PEG 2.09 vs 6.02 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.6% margin vs LOW's 7.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs LOW's 0.86 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs LOW's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.8% vs HD's -7.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.5% ROA vs LOW's 12.3%, ROIC 32.1% vs 76.2% |
LOW vs HD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LOW vs HD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HD is the larger business by revenue, generating $164.7B annually — 1.9x LOW's $86.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.6% (HD) to 7.7% (LOW). On growth, LOW holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86.3B | $164.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12.3B | $24.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.7B | $14.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7.7B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.5% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +7.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.0% | -14.6% |
Valuation Metrics
LOW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, LOW trades at a 13% valuation discount to HD's 22.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LOW offers better value at 2.22x vs HD's 6.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $130.7B | $321.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $136.9B | $338.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.69x | 22.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.54x | 21.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.22x | 6.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.32x | 14.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 1.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 25.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.08x | 25.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOW leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOW scores 6/9 vs HD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +110.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.3% | +13.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +76.2% | +32.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +33.6% | +29.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.2B | $17.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $982M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.2B | $19.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.90x | 8.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LOW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LOW five years ago would be worth $12,361 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,797 for HD. Over the past 12 months, LOW leads with a +6.8% total return vs HD's -7.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HD at 6.7% vs LOW's 6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.5% | -5.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.8% | -7.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.1% | +21.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.6% | +8.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +249.6% | +185.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.6% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LOW and HD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HD is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LOW's 0.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOW currently trades 79.6% from its 52-week high vs HD's 75.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $293.06 | $426.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $210.33 | $310.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.6% | +75.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.9 | 36.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
HD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LOW as "Buy" and HD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.3% upside for HD (target: $408) vs 23.5% for LOW (target: $288). For income investors, HD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.84% vs LOW's 2.02%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $288.25 | $408.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 51 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.71 | $9.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
LOW leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HD leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
LOW vs HD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOW or HD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the stronger pick with 3. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW). Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (18. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LOW or HD?
On trailing P/E, Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) is the cheapest at 19. 7x versus The Home Depot, Inc. at 22. 7x. On forward P/E, Lowe's Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Lowe's Companies, Inc. wins at 2. 09x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 02x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LOW or HD?
Over the past 5 years, Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) delivered a total return of +23. 6%, compared to +8. 0% for The Home Depot, Inc. (HD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOW returned +249. 6% versus HD's +185. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LOW or HD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Lowe's Companies, Inc. 's 0. 86β — meaning LOW is approximately 3% more volatile than HD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — LOW or HD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is pulling ahead at 3. 2% versus 3. 1% for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lowe's Companies, Inc. grew EPS -3. 1% year-over-year, compared to -4. 6% for The Home Depot, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HD leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LOW or HD?
The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus 7. 7% for Lowe's Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HD leads at 12. 7% versus 11. 8% for LOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOW leads at 33. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LOW or HD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 09x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 02x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) trades at 18. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for The Home Depot, Inc. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HD: 26. 3% to $408. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — LOW or HD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 2. 0% for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW).
09Is LOW or HD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 2. 0% yield, +249. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOW: +249. 6%, HD: +185. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LOW and HD?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.