Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Renewable Utilities
BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $36K | $62.75B | $4.34B | $7.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $2.45B | $710M | $1.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $6M | $-1.63B | $2M |
| Gross Margin | -6.8% | 31.1% | 99.8% | 36.6% |
| Operating Margin | -30.3% | 8.2% | 38.1% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 123.5x | — | 26.9x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $2.99B | $997M | $10.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $2.45B | $1M | $818M |
BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bolt Projects Holdi… (BSLK) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 1927.8 | +1827.8% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 126.3 | +26.3% |
| Clearway Energy, In… (CWEN) | 100 | 143.0 | +43.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSLK plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 37.3%, EPS growth -184.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
- 9.4% 10Y total return vs CWEN's 237.5%
- 37.3% revenue growth vs BSLK's -60.1%
- 0.2% margin vs BSLK's -47.6%
PLUG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CWEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 7.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 1.13x
- Beta 0.55, yield 7.9%, current ratio 1.13x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.3% revenue growth vs BSLK's -60.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs BSLK's -47.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs BE's 3.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.1% vs BSLK's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs BSLK's -218.1% |
BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CWEN leads in 3 of 6 categories
BE leads 2 • BSLK leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 1783.7x BSLK's $1M. BE is the more profitable business, keeping 0.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BSLK's -47.6%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $2.4B | $710M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | $240M | -$1.5B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | $6M | -$1.6B | $2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $233M | -$2M | $189M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | +31.1% | +99.8% | +36.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -30.3% | +8.2% | +38.1% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -47.6% | +0.2% | -2.3% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.8% | +9.5% | -0.3% | +12.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +130.4% | +17.6% | +18.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -142.1% | +3.3% | +95.9% | -46.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CWEN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CWEN's 16.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 513.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35,520 | $62.8B | $4.3B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $63.3B | $5.3B | $17.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -705.49x | — | 26.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 123.47x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 513.03x | — | 16.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 31.00x | 6.12x | 5.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 79.14x | — | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1097.28x | — | 21.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BE and PLUG each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BE delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. CWEN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.72x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLUG scores 5/9 vs CWEN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +0.8% | -124.4% | +0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +0.2% | -64.3% | +0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +4.1% | +10.9% | +0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.0% | +2.5% | +18.6% | +1.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.77x | 19.75x | 1.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | $538M | $996M | $9.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $2.5B | $1M | $818M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $3.0B | $997M | $10.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.88x | 1.05x | -36.18x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $129,930 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for BSLK. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1414.1% total return vs BSLK's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.8% vs BSLK's -94.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -92.3% | +164.5% | +39.9% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.3% | +1414.1% | +266.9% | +39.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +1440.0% | -66.4% | +43.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +1199.3% | -84.5% | +78.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +944.1% | +61.7% | +237.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -94.1% | +148.8% | -30.5% | +12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CWEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWEN currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs BSLK's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.97x | 3.62x | 2.55x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.55 | $302.99 | $4.58 | $41.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.04 | $16.47 | $0.69 | $27.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.3% | +86.2% | +68.1% | +91.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.1 | 60.3 | 56.2 | 44.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 10.2M | 75.2M | 829K |
Analyst Outlook
CWEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BE as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", CWEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for PLUG (target: $4) vs -28.1% for BE (target: $188). CWEN is the only dividend payer here at 7.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $187.56 | $3.91 | $43.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 | 38 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | +7.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | — | $3.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CWEN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). BE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger pick with 37.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -60. 1% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK). Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1199%, compared to -100.
0% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +944. 1% versus BSLK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 62β — meaning BE is approximately 553% more volatile than CWEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 172% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is pulling ahead at 37.
3% versus -60. 1% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN?
Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -47. 6% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -30. 3% for BSLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLUG: 25.
3% to $3. 91.
07Which pays a better dividend — BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN?
In this comparison, CWEN (7.
9% yield) pays a dividend. BSLK, BE, PLUG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 7. 9% yield, +237. 5% 10Y return). Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK) carries a higher beta of 1. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWEN: +237. 5%, BSLK: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BSLK and BE and PLUG and CWEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (BSLK (Financial Services) and BE (Industrials) and PLUG (Industrials) and CWEN (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BSLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWEN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CWEN pays a dividend while BSLK, BE, PLUG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.