Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BSRR vs FIS vs JKHY vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Banks - Regional
BSRR vs FIS vs JKHY vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $494M | $24.47B | $10.57B | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $202M | $10.89B | $2.52B | $643M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $42M | $382M | $519M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 73.9% | 38.1% | 44.1% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 27.9% | 17.5% | 26.0% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 7.5x | 21.8x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $519M | $4.01B | $0.00 | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $136M | $599M | $102M | $108M |
BSRR vs FIS vs JKHY vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sierra Bancorp (BSRR) | 100 | 200.4 | +100.4% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSRR vs FIS vs JKHY vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSRR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and bank quality is your priority.
- 173.2% 10Y total return vs JKHY's 94.9%
- NIM 3.3% vs CVBF's 2.9%
- +47.1% vs FIS's -35.3%
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.31 vs CVBF's 4.48
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.16
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.27x
- 7.2% revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 32.5% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.5% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs BSRR's 1.07 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs CVBF's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.1% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs BSRR's 1.1%, ROIC 21.0% vs 5.6% |
BSRR vs FIS vs JKHY vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BSRR vs FIS vs JKHY vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • JKHY leads 1 • BSRR leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 53.9x BSRR's $202M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $202M | $10.9B | $2.5B | $643M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $58M | $3.8B | $810M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $42M | $382M | $519M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $31M | $2.8B | $728M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.9% | +38.1% | +44.1% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +17.5% | +26.0% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +3.5% | +20.6% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +26.1% | +28.9% | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.2% | +8.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.7% | +92.3% | +12.5% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, BSRR trades at a 81% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSRR offers better value at 2.01x vs CVBF's 4.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $494M | $24.5B | $10.6B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $878M | $27.9B | $10.5B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.14x | 63.00x | 23.40x | 13.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.11x | 7.54x | 21.79x | 14.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.01x | 2.58x | 2.32x | 4.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.57x | 7.66x | 13.53x | 13.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.45x | 2.29x | 4.45x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 1.76x | 5.01x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.37x | 9.97x | 17.97x | 12.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BSRR's 1.42x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | +2.7% | +24.0% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.1% | +17.0% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +6.0% | +21.0% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +6.6% | +22.7% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.42x | 0.29x | — | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $383M | $3.4B | -$102M | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $136M | $599M | $102M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $519M | $4.0B | $0 | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.21x | 4.64x | 122.37x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BSRR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSRR five years ago would be worth $15,238 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BSRR leads with a +47.1% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSRR at 37.4% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.0% | -27.3% | -17.8% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.1% | -35.3% | -13.6% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +159.3% | -6.6% | -1.0% | +94.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.4% | -63.2% | +0.3% | +12.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.2% | -13.2% | +94.9% | +67.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.4% | -2.2% | -0.3% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BSRR and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BSRR's 1.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BSRR currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 0.76x | 0.28x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.60 | $82.74 | $193.39 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.16 | $43.30 | $141.81 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +57.1% | +75.5% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 43.3 | 28.2 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 44K | 5.5M | 902K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JKHY and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BSRR as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 16.5% for BSRR (target: $44). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs JKHY's 1.54%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.00 | $67.38 | $203.75 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 37 | 22 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +3.5% | +1.5% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 1 | 32 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.01 | $1.63 | $2.25 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +2.9% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BSRR vs FIS vs JKHY vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSRR or FIS or JKHY or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Sierra Bancorp (BSRR) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSRR or FIS or JKHY or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, Sierra Bancorp (BSRR) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSRR or FIS or JKHY or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, Sierra Bancorp (BSRR) delivered a total return of +52.
4%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSRR returned +173. 2% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSRR or FIS or JKHY or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Sierra Bancorp's 1. 07β — meaning BSRR is approximately 276% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 142% for Sierra Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BSRR or FIS or JKHY or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. grew EPS 19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BSRR or FIS or JKHY or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BSRR or FIS or JKHY or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — BSRR or FIS or JKHY or CVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 5% for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY).
09Is BSRR or FIS or JKHY or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, BSRR: +173. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BSRR and FIS and JKHY and CVBF?
These companies operate in different sectors (BSRR (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology) and CVBF (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BSRR is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.