BTX vs GSBD vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG

For growth investors, Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

(GBDC) is the stronger pick with 42. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -81. 1% for BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust (BTX). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 7x versus BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust at 47. 9x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Golub Capital BDC, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) delivered a total return of +48.

0%, compared to -37. 2% for BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust (BTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARCC returned +139. 6% versus BTX's -37. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.

(GSBD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust's 1. 28β — meaning BTX is approximately 178% more volatile than GSBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 112% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

(GBDC) is pulling ahead at 42. 5% versus -81. 1% for BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust (BTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. grew EPS 87. 3% year-over-year, compared to -82. 7% for BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust (BTX) is the more profitable company, earning 87.

7% net margin versus 41. 3% for Ares Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 87. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GSBD leads at 98. 4% versus 69. 7% for ARCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 9. 9x for Ares Capital Corporation — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 55. 1% to $8. 95.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) offers the highest yield at 21. 8%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.

(GSBD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 21. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GSBD: +41. 3%, BTX: -37. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (BTX (Healthcare) and GSBD (Financial Services) and ARCC (Financial Services) and GBDC (Financial Services) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BTX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GSBD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.