Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BTX vs TPVG vs HTGC vs CSWC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
BTX vs TPVG vs HTGC vs CSWC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $945M | $243M | $3.07B | $1.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41M | $97M | $547M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $36M | $-12M | $289M | $103M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 83.5% | 87.2% | 66.5% |
| Operating Margin | 87.7% | 77.9% | 66.7% | 48.5% |
| Forward P/E | 47.6x | 6.5x | 8.4x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $469M | $2.30B | $956M |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $20M | $57M | $43M |
BTX vs TPVG vs HTGC vs CSWC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock Technolog… (BTX) | 100 | 39.9 | -60.1% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 41.5 | -58.5% |
| Hercules Capital, I… (HTGC) | 100 | 102.3 | +2.3% |
| Capital Southwest C… (CSWC) | 100 | 108.3 | +8.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BTX vs TPVG vs HTGC vs CSWC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- 87.7% margin vs CSWC's 43.1%
- +37.7% vs HTGC's +6.6%
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- Beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs BTX's -81.1%
HTGC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, current ratio 1.44x
- NIM 9.1% vs CSWC's 7.0%
- Beta 0.69 vs BTX's 1.29
- 6.4% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 6.6% vs 7.2%
CSWC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 234.2% 10Y total return vs HTGC's 171.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs BTX's -81.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 10.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 87.7% margin vs CSWC's 43.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs BTX's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 17.1% yield, vs CSWC's 10.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.7% vs HTGC's +6.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 6.6% vs 7.2% |
BTX vs TPVG vs HTGC vs CSWC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTX leads in 1 of 6 categories
TPVG leads 1 • HTGC leads 1 • CSWC leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTGC is the larger business by revenue, generating $547M annually — 13.4x BTX's $41M. BTX is the more profitable business, keeping 87.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CSWC's 43.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41M | $97M | $547M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$22M | $381M | $142M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$12M | $289M | $103M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $35M | -$352M | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +83.5% | +87.2% | +66.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +87.7% | +77.9% | +66.7% | +48.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +87.7% | +50.6% | +62.1% | +43.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | -58.7% | -77.8% | -132.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.3% | -20.7% | +113.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TPVG leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 90% valuation discount to BTX's 47.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TPVG's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSWC's 27.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $945M | $243M | $3.1B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $945M | $691M | $5.3B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.65x | 4.91x | 8.86x | 16.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.50x | 8.41x | 10.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.48x | 9.13x | 14.54x | 27.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 23.23x | 2.50x | 5.61x | 8.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 0.68x | 1.44x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.41x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HTGC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTGC delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. HTGC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPVG scores 5/9 vs CSWC's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.9% | -3.4% | +13.2% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | -1.5% | +6.4% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +7.2% | +6.6% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +9.4% | +8.8% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.33x | 1.04x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | $449M | $2.2B | $913M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $20M | $57M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $469M | $2.3B | $956M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2313.25x | -1.02x | 4.34x | 2.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSWC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSWC five years ago would be worth $15,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,198 for BTX. Over the past 12 months, BTX leads with a +37.7% total return vs HTGC's +6.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSWC at 20.7% vs TPVG's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.2% | -6.3% | -10.6% | +11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.7% | +19.3% | +6.6% | +34.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.5% | -3.4% | +63.9% | +75.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.0% | -13.5% | +46.8% | +51.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.6% | +93.3% | +171.6% | +234.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.8% | -1.2% | +17.9% | +20.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BTX and HTGC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HTGC is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTX's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTX currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs TPVG's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.83x | 0.69x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.22 | $7.53 | $19.67 | $24.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.13 | $4.48 | $13.70 | $19.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +79.5% | +83.4% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.3 | 58.3 | 64.7 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 727K | 504K | 2.5M | 664K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TPVG and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TPVG as "Hold", HTGC as "Buy", CSWC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs -6.2% for CSWC (target: $23). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs HTGC's 8.64%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 | $18.92 | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 31 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.6% | +17.1% | +8.6% | +10.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.86 | $1.02 | $1.42 | $2.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.8% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
BTX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TPVG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BTX vs TPVG vs HTGC vs CSWC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BTX or TPVG or HTGC or CSWC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -81. 1% for BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust (BTX). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BTX or TPVG or HTGC or CSWC?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BTX or TPVG or HTGC or CSWC?
Over the past 5 years, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) delivered a total return of +51.
4%, compared to -38. 0% for BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust (BTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSWC returned +234. 2% versus BTX's -37. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BTX or TPVG or HTGC or CSWC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust's 1. 29β — meaning BTX is approximately 87% more volatile than HTGC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 104% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BTX or TPVG or HTGC or CSWC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -81. 1% for BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust (BTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -82. 7% for BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BTX or TPVG or HTGC or CSWC?
BlackRock Technology and Private Equity Term Trust (BTX) is the more profitable company, earning 87.
7% net margin versus 43. 1% for Capital Southwest Corporation — meaning it keeps 87. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTX leads at 87. 7% versus 48. 5% for CSWC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BTX or TPVG or HTGC or CSWC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 10. 1x for Capital Southwest Corporation — 3. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — BTX or TPVG or HTGC or CSWC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the highest yield at 17. 1%, versus 8. 6% for Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC).
09Is BTX or TPVG or HTGC or CSWC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69), 8. 6% yield, +171. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HTGC: +171. 6%, BTX: -37. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BTX and TPVG and HTGC and CSWC?
These companies operate in different sectors (BTX (Healthcare) and TPVG (Financial Services) and HTGC (Financial Services) and CSWC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BTX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; HTGC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.