Beverages - Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BUD vs DEO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
BUD vs DEO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries |
| Market Cap | $138.11B | $46.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $119.82B | $37.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12.57B | $5.49B |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 31.7% | 27.9% |
| Forward P/E | 18.8x | 17.8x |
| Total Debt | $72.17B | $24.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11.17B | $2.20B |
BUD vs DEO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anheuser-Busch InBe… (BUD) | 100 | 171.2 | +71.2% |
| Diageo plc (DEO) | 100 | 59.3 | -40.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BUD vs DEO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BUD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 0.7%, EPS growth 10.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 81.4%, current ratio 0.70x
- 0.7% revenue growth vs DEO's -0.1%
DEO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 4.9%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs BUD's -24.5%
- Beta 0.37, yield 4.9%, current ratio 1.63x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.7% revenue growth vs DEO's -0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.8x vs 18.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.7% margin vs BUD's 10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs DEO's 0.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.9% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs BUD's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.5% vs DEO's -25.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.7% ROA vs BUD's 6.0%, ROIC 9.6% vs 7.5% |
BUD vs DEO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BUD vs DEO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BUD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BUD is the larger business by revenue, generating $119.8B annually — 3.2x DEO's $37.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.7% (DEO) to 10.5% (BUD). On growth, BUD holds the edge at +0.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $119.8B | $37.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $38.8B | $11.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12.6B | $5.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32.2B | $7.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.7% | +27.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +14.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.9% | +20.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.4% | -29.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.3% | -24.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BUD and DEO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, DEO trades at a 30% valuation discount to BUD's 28.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BUD's 9.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DEO's 11.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $138.1B | $46.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $199.1B | $68.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.06x | 19.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.81x | 17.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.47x | 11.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.31x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.85x | 3.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.34x | 17.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DEO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DEO delivers a 54.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $54 in annual profit, vs $14 for BUD. BUD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.81x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DEO's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BUD scores 9/9 vs DEO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.8% | +54.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | +14.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 1.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $61.0B | $22.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11.2B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $72.2B | $24.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.53x | 5.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BUD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BUD five years ago would be worth $11,236 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,612 for DEO. Over the past 12 months, BUD leads with a +24.5% total return vs DEO's -25.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BUD at 8.4% vs DEO's -20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.0% | -3.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.5% | -25.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.5% | -49.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.4% | -43.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.5% | +10.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.4% | -20.3% |
Risk & Volatility
BUD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BUD is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DEO's 0.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUD currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs DEO's 71.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.28x | 0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.91 | $116.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.97 | $72.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +71.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.7 | 63.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
DEO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BUD as "Buy" and DEO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 48.6% upside for DEO (target: $124) vs 10.9% for BUD (target: $89). For income investors, DEO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.95% vs BUD's 1.63%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.00 | $124.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 45 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +4.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.31 | $4.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% |
BUD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). DEO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
BUD vs DEO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BUD or DEO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is the stronger pick with 0.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 1% for Diageo plc (DEO). Diageo plc (DEO) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BUD or DEO?
On trailing P/E, Diageo plc (DEO) is the cheapest at 19.
7x versus Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV at 28. 1x. On forward P/E, Diageo plc is actually cheaper at 17. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BUD or DEO?
Over the past 5 years, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) delivered a total return of +12.
4%, compared to -43. 9% for Diageo plc (DEO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DEO returned +10. 0% versus BUD's -24. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BUD or DEO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
28β versus Diageo plc's 0. 37β — meaning DEO is approximately 31% more volatile than BUD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 81% versus 185% for Diageo plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BUD or DEO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is pulling ahead at 0.
7% versus -0. 1% for Diageo plc (DEO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV grew EPS 10. 0% year-over-year, compared to -38. 7% for Diageo plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DEO leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BUD or DEO?
Diageo plc (DEO) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
6% net margin versus 9. 8% for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV — meaning it keeps 11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BUD leads at 25. 9% versus 21. 4% for DEO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DEO leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BUD or DEO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diageo plc (DEO) trades at 17.
8x forward P/E versus 18. 8x for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DEO: 48. 6% to $124. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BUD or DEO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Diageo plc (DEO) offers the highest yield at 4. 9%, versus 1. 6% for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD).
09Is BUD or DEO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
28), 1. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BUD: -24. 5%, DEO: +10. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BUD and DEO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BUD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DEO is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.