Beverages - Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BUD vs WMT vs KO vs TGT vs SYY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Discount Stores
Food Distribution
BUD vs WMT vs KO vs TGT vs SYY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Alcoholic | Specialty Retail | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Discount Stores | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $137.47B | $1.04T | $337.53B | $57.06B | $34.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $119.82B | $703.06B | $49.28B | $106.25B | $83.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12.57B | $22.91B | $13.70B | $4.04B | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 24.9% | 61.7% | 27.3% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 31.7% | 4.1% | 29.3% | 5.3% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 18.7x | 44.8x | 24.1x | 15.7x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $72.17B | $67.09B | $45.49B | $5.59B | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11.17B | $10.73B | $10.27B | $5.49B | $1.07B |
BUD vs WMT vs KO vs TGT vs SYY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anheuser-Busch InBe… (BUD) | 100 | 170.4 | +70.4% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 315.3 | +215.3% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 168.0 | +68.0% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 102.4 | +2.4% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 131.3 | +31.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BUD vs WMT vs KO vs TGT vs SYY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BUD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs KO's 111.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- 4.7% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7%
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1%
- 13.1% ROA vs BUD's 6.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.5%
TGT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (15.7x vs 24.1x)
- 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8%
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 2.8%
- PEG 0.29 vs WMT's 4.07
- Beta 0.46, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.7x vs 24.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs TGT's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.1% vs SYY's +4.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs BUD's 6.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.5% |
BUD vs WMT vs KO vs TGT vs SYY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BUD vs WMT vs KO vs TGT vs SYY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGT leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • BUD leads 0 • SYY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 14.3x KO's $49.3B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SYY's 2.1%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $119.8B | $703.1B | $49.3B | $106.2B | $83.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $38.8B | $42.8B | $15.5B | $8.7B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12.6B | $22.9B | $13.7B | $4.0B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32.2B | $15.3B | $12.6B | $2.9B | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +24.9% | +61.7% | +27.3% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.7% | +4.1% | +29.3% | +5.3% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +3.3% | +27.8% | +3.8% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.9% | +2.2% | +25.5% | +2.8% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.4% | +5.8% | +12.1% | +3.2% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.3% | +35.1% | +18.2% | +23.7% | -13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TGT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, TGT trades at a 68% valuation discount to WMT's 47.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.35x vs WMT's 4.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $137.5B | $1.04T | $337.5B | $57.1B | $34.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $198.5B | $1.10T | $372.8B | $57.2B | $48.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.93x | 47.76x | 25.80x | 15.41x | 19.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.69x | 44.77x | 24.06x | 15.66x | 15.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.34x | 2.31x | — | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.44x | 24.88x | 25.17x | 7.22x | 11.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 1.46x | 7.04x | 0.54x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.84x | 10.47x | 9.87x | 3.53x | 19.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.28x | 25.00x | 63.73x | 20.13x | 19.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $14 for BUD. TGT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BUD scores 9/9 vs SYY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.8% | +22.3% | +41.1% | +26.1% | +80.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | +7.9% | +13.1% | +6.9% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | +14.7% | +15.8% | +16.7% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +17.5% | +17.3% | +13.6% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.67x | 1.33x | 0.35x | 7.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $61.0B | $56.4B | $35.2B | $104M | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11.2B | $10.7B | $10.3B | $5.5B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $72.2B | $67.1B | $45.5B | $5.6B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.53x | 11.85x | 10.70x | 12.40x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,660 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,828 for TGT. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +35.1% total return vs SYY's +4.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.7% vs TGT's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.2% | +16.1% | +14.2% | +25.7% | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.2% | +35.1% | +13.1% | +33.9% | +4.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.7% | +161.3% | +31.9% | -11.4% | +3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.0% | +186.6% | +59.9% | -31.7% | -3.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.9% | +501.4% | +111.2% | +98.7% | +81.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +37.7% | +9.7% | -4.0% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGT's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs SYY's 79.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 0.11x | -0.08x | 0.94x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.91 | $134.69 | $82.00 | $133.07 | $91.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.97 | $91.89 | $65.35 | $83.44 | $68.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.4% | +96.8% | +95.6% | +94.1% | +79.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.2 | 56.2 | 56.9 | 50.5 | 40.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 17.1M | 13.3M | 4.5M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and TGT and SYY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BUD as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", TGT as "Hold", SYY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.8% upside for SYY (target: $90) vs -7.8% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, TGT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.00 | $137.22 | $85.71 | $115.44 | $90.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 45 | 64 | 48 | 59 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +0.7% | +2.6% | +3.6% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 37 | 35 | 22 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.31 | $0.94 | $2.04 | $4.51 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +0.7% | +3.6% |
TGT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
BUD vs WMT vs KO vs TGT vs SYY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BUD or WMT or KO or TGT or SYY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Target Corporation (TGT) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BUD or WMT or KO or TGT or SYY?
On trailing P/E, Target Corporation (TGT) is the cheapest at 15.
4x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 8x. On forward P/E, Target Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BUD or WMT or KO or TGT or SYY?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 6%, compared to -31. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +501. 4% versus BUD's -23. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BUD or WMT or KO or TGT or SYY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
08β versus Target Corporation's 0. 94β — meaning TGT is approximately -1343% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Target Corporation (TGT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BUD or WMT or KO or TGT or SYY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -8. 2% for Target Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SYY leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BUD or WMT or KO or TGT or SYY?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 2. 2% for Sysco Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 3. 8% for SYY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BUD or WMT or KO or TGT or SYY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Target Corporation (TGT) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 8x for Walmart Inc. — 29. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYY: 24. 8% to $90. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — BUD or WMT or KO or TGT or SYY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Target Corporation (TGT) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is BUD or WMT or KO or TGT or SYY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11), 0. 7% yield, +501. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +501. 4%, TGT: +98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BUD and WMT and KO and TGT and SYY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BUD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.