Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BURU vs NPKI vs TER vs IPGP vs AMAT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BURU
Nuburu, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-89.8%
NPKI
NPK International Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.30B
5Y Perf.+84.6%
TER
Teradyne, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$55.44B
5Y Perf.+221.9%
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.31B
5Y Perf.+30.2%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$325.54B
5Y Perf.+135.0%

BURU vs NPKI vs TER vs IPGP vs AMAT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BURU logoBURU
NPKI logoNPKI
TER logoTER
IPGP logoIPGP
AMAT logoAMAT
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$1M$1.30B$55.44B$4.31B$325.54B
Revenue (TTM)$109K$287M$3.79B$1.04B$28.37B
Net Income (TTM)$-63M$36M$854M$29M$7.00B
Gross Margin-392.0%35.2%58.8%37.6%48.7%
Operating Margin-116.1%11.4%26.9%0.3%29.2%
Forward P/E29.3x49.1x62.6x37.1x
Total Debt$9M$37M$347M$0.00$6.55B
Cash & Equiv.$209K$5M$294M$404M$7.24B

BURU vs NPKI vs TER vs IPGP vs AMATLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BURU
NPKI
TER
IPGP
AMAT
StockNov 24May 26Return
Nuburu, Inc. (BURU)10010.2-89.8%
NPK International I… (NPKI)100184.6+84.6%
Teradyne, Inc. (TER)100321.9+221.9%
IPG Photonics Corpo… (IPGP)100130.2+30.2%
Applied Materials, … (AMAT)100235.0+135.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BURU vs NPKI vs TER vs IPGP vs AMAT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NPKI and TER are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Teradyne, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. AMAT and BURU also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BURU
Nuburu, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

BURU is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.

  • Beta 1.21 vs TER's 2.60
Best for: stability
NPKI
NPK International Inc.
The Growth Play

NPKI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 27.4%, EPS growth 124.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.47, Low D/E 10.4%, current ratio 1.43x
  • 27.4% revenue growth vs BURU's -92.7%
  • Lower P/E (29.3x vs 37.1x)
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

TER is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.

  • +372.2% vs BURU's -65.9%
  • 20.9% ROA vs BURU's -479.1%
Best for: momentum and efficiency
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IPGP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
The Income Pick

AMAT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.14, yield 0.4%
  • 20.1% 10Y total return vs TER's 18.0%
  • Beta 2.14, yield 0.4%, current ratio 2.61x
  • 24.7% margin vs BURU's -578.5%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNPKI logoNPKI27.4% revenue growth vs BURU's -92.7%
ValueNPKI logoNPKILower P/E (29.3x vs 37.1x)
Quality / MarginsAMAT logoAMAT24.7% margin vs BURU's -578.5%
Stability / SafetyBURU logoBURUBeta 1.21 vs TER's 2.60
DividendsAMAT logoAMAT0.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs TER's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TER logoTER+372.2% vs BURU's -65.9%
Efficiency (ROA)TER logoTER20.9% ROA vs BURU's -479.1%

BURU vs NPKI vs TER vs IPGP vs AMAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BURUNuburu, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NPKINPK International Inc.
FY 2025
Rental and Service
66.3%$184M
Product
33.7%$93M
TERTeradyne, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
83.4%$2.7B
Service
16.6%$530M
IPGPIPG Photonics Corporation
FY 2025
High Power Continuous Wave CW Lasers
41.8%$309M
Laser And Non-Laser Systems
19.9%$147M
Pulsed Lasers
19.4%$143M
Medium And Low Power CW Lasers
11.9%$88M
Quasi-Continuous Wave QCW Lasers
7.0%$52M
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.
FY 2024
Semiconductor Systems
73.7%$19.9B
Applied Global Services
23.0%$6.2B
Display and Adjacent Markets
3.3%$885M

BURU vs NPKI vs TER vs IPGP vs AMAT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMATLAGGINGIPGP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — TER and AMAT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.4B annually — 260467.2x BURU's $108,912. AMAT is the more profitable business, keeping 24.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BURU's -578.5%. On growth, TER holds the edge at +87.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.NPKI logoNPKINPK International…TER logoTERTeradyne, Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…AMAT logoAMATApplied Materials…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$108,912$287M$3.8B$1.0B$28.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$39M$53M$1.1B$55M$8.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$63M$36M$854M$29M$7.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M$32M$553M$8M$5.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-3.9%+35.2%+58.8%+37.6%+48.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-116.1%+11.4%+26.9%+0.3%+29.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-578.5%+12.4%+22.6%+2.8%+24.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-69.8%+11.1%+14.6%+0.8%+20.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.9%+87.0%+16.6%-3.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+82.1%0.0%+3.1%-54.4%+13.9%
Evenly matched — TER and AMAT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NPKI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 36.8x trailing earnings, NPKI trades at a 74% valuation discount to IPGP's 139.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NPKI's 18.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TER's 67.7x.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.NPKI logoNPKINPK International…TER logoTERTeradyne, Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…AMAT logoAMATApplied Materials…
Market CapShares × price$1M$1.3B$55.4B$4.3B$325.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11M$1.3B$55.5B$3.9B$324.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.04x36.75x101.76x139.22x47.40x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.34x49.12x62.62x37.07x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.76x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.49x67.66x48.90x38.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.14x4.71x17.38x4.30x11.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.77x19.97x2.04x16.25x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF49.58x123.09x57.13x
NPKI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AMAT delivers a 34.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $1 for IPGP. NPKI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMAT's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NPKI scores 7/9 vs BURU's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.NPKI logoNPKINPK International…TER logoTERTeradyne, Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…AMAT logoAMATApplied Materials…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.3%+29.7%+1.4%+34.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-4.8%+8.5%+20.9%+1.2%+19.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.9%+19.8%+0.6%+33.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+12.7%+22.5%+0.6%+30.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–917667
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x0.12x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9M$31M$53M-$404M-$686M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$209,337$5M$294M$404M$7.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$37M$347M$0$6.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.34x77.08x69.13x35.46x
AMAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMAT five years ago would be worth $31,383 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for BURU. Over the past 12 months, TER leads with a +372.2% total return vs BURU's -65.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TER at 57.3% vs BURU's -89.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.NPKI logoNPKINPK International…TER logoTERTeradyne, Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…AMAT logoAMATApplied Materials…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-76.1%+27.6%+70.7%+35.8%+52.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-65.9%+94.9%+372.2%+75.6%+164.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+91.5%+288.9%-12.7%+258.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+91.5%+178.1%-48.5%+213.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+91.5%+1802.5%+20.2%+2014.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-89.2%+24.2%+57.3%-4.4%+53.1%
TER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BURU and AMAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BURU is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TER's 2.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMAT currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs BURU's 5.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.NPKI logoNPKINPK International…TER logoTERTeradyne, Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…AMAT logoAMATApplied Materials…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.21x1.47x2.60x1.80x2.14x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.24$16.50$422.11$155.82$432.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.15$7.63$73.11$53.98$151.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+5.6%+93.5%+83.9%+65.2%+94.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.756.657.039.766.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded41.8M795K3.4M510K6.0M
Evenly matched — BURU and AMAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

AMAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NPKI as "Buy", TER as "Buy", IPGP as "Buy", AMAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for IPGP (target: $152) vs -0.9% for TER (target: $351). For income investors, AMAT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.42% vs TER's 0.14%.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.NPKI logoNPKINPK International…TER logoTERTeradyne, Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…AMAT logoAMATApplied Materials…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$351.09$151.67$426.39
# AnalystsCovering analysts3312753
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0418
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.48$1.71
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.7%+1.3%+1.3%+1.5%
AMAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AMAT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). NPKI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallApplied Materials, Inc. (AMAT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BURU vs NPKI vs TER vs IPGP vs AMAT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BURU or NPKI or TER or IPGP or AMAT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) is the stronger pick with 27. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -92. 7% for Nuburu, Inc. (BURU). NPK International Inc. (NPKI) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (29. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NPK International Inc. (NPKI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BURU or NPKI or TER or IPGP or AMAT?

On trailing P/E, NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) is the cheapest at 36. 8x versus IPG Photonics Corporation at 139. 2x. On forward P/E, NPK International Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BURU or NPKI or TER or IPGP or AMAT?

Over the past 5 years, Applied Materials, Inc.

(AMAT) delivered a total return of +213. 8%, compared to -99. 9% for Nuburu, Inc. (BURU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMAT returned +20. 1% versus BURU's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BURU or NPKI or TER or IPGP or AMAT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuburu, Inc.

(BURU) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus Teradyne, Inc. 's 2. 60β — meaning TER is approximately 114% more volatile than BURU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NPK International Inc. (NPKI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 32% for Applied Materials, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BURU or NPKI or TER or IPGP or AMAT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) is pulling ahead at 27. 4% versus -92. 7% for Nuburu, Inc. (BURU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NPK International Inc. grew EPS 124. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 6% for Applied Materials, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NPKI leads at 12. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BURU or NPKI or TER or IPGP or AMAT?

Applied Materials, Inc.

(AMAT) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus -226. 9% for Nuburu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMAT leads at 29. 2% versus -86. 4% for BURU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TER leads at 58. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BURU or NPKI or TER or IPGP or AMAT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) trades at 29. 3x forward P/E versus 62. 6x for IPG Photonics Corporation — 33. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPGP: 49. 2% to $151. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BURU or NPKI or TER or IPGP or AMAT?

In this comparison, AMAT (0.

4% yield), TER (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BURU, NPKI, IPGP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BURU or NPKI or TER or IPGP or AMAT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Teradyne, Inc.

(TER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1803% 10Y return). Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TER: +1803%, AMAT: +20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BURU and NPKI and TER and IPGP and AMAT?

These companies operate in different sectors (BURU (Industrials) and NPKI (Energy) and TER (Technology) and IPGP (Technology) and AMAT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BURU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NPKI is a small-cap high-growth stock; TER is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IPGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BURU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NPKI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TER

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 43%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IPGP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMAT

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BURU and NPKI and TER and IPGP and AMAT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BURU: -92.7% · NPKI: 15.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.