Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BUUU vs BTBT vs MARA vs CLPS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BUUU
BUUU Group Limited Class A Ordinary Share

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$237M
5Y Perf.+38.3%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$631M
5Y Perf.+105.2%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.84B
5Y Perf.+1717.1%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$27M
5Y Perf.-49.2%

BUUU vs BTBT vs MARA vs CLPS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BUUU logoBUUU
BTBT logoBTBT
MARA logoMARA
CLPS logoCLPS
IndustrySpecialty Business ServicesFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$237M$631M$4.84B$27M
Revenue (TTM)$6M$164M$907M$299M
Net Income (TTM)$834K$137M$-2.04B$-4M
Gross Margin25.8%61.9%-47.7%22.8%
Operating Margin17.7%16.8%-90.6%-1.4%
Forward P/E400.4x9.8x
Total Debt$723K$14M$3.65B$34M
Cash & Equiv.$449K$95M$547M$28M

BUUU vs BTBT vs MARA vs CLPSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BUUU
BTBT
MARA
CLPS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)100205.2+105.2%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)1001817.1+1717.1%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10050.8-49.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BUUU vs BTBT vs MARA vs CLPS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. BUUU Group Limited Class A Ordinary Share is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CLPS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BUUU
BUUU Group Limited Class A Ordinary Share
The Long-Run Compounder

BUUU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 406.5% 10Y total return vs MARA's -57.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 53.8%, current ratio 2.00x
  • +406.5% vs MARA's -20.3%
  • 37.6% ROA vs MARA's -28.5%, ROIC 62.8% vs -9.0%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CLPS's 15.2%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 13.9%
  • Beta 0.19, yield 13.9%, current ratio 1.58x
  • Beta 0.19 vs BTBT's 3.41
  • 13.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CLPS's 15.2%
ValueBTBT logoBTBTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.19 vs BTBT's 3.41
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS13.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BUUU logoBUUU+406.5% vs MARA's -20.3%
Efficiency (ROA)BUUU logoBUUU37.6% ROA vs MARA's -28.5%, ROIC 62.8% vs -9.0%

BUUU vs BTBT vs MARA vs CLPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BUUUBUUU Group Limited Class A Ordinary Share

Segment breakdown not available.

BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598

BUUU vs BTBT vs MARA vs CLPS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBUUULAGGINGMARA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 156.1x BUUU's $6M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%.

MetricBUUU logoBUUUBUUU Group Limite…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6M$164M$907M$299M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$166M-$102M-$1M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$137M-$2.0B-$4M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$448M-$385M$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.8%+61.9%-47.7%+22.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+17.7%+16.8%-90.6%-1.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.4%+17.3%-144.6%-1.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.1%-65.3%-34.4%-2.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.8%-113.5%+75.8%
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CLPS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 9.8x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 98% valuation discount to BUUU's 400.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BUUU's 220.3x.

MetricBUUU logoBUUUBUUU Group Limite…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Market CapShares × price$237M$631M$4.8B$27M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$237M$550M$7.9B$32M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS400.40x9.80x-3.45x-3.65x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple220.31x9.19x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue40.70x3.86x5.33x0.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share249.09x0.60x1.30x0.45x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3823.10x
CLPS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BUUU leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

BUUU delivers a 91.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $91 in annual profit, vs $-61 for MARA. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BUUU scores 8/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBUUU logoBUUUBUUU Group Limite…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+91.3%+21.4%-60.6%-6.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+37.6%+19.0%-28.5%-3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+62.8%+6.5%-9.0%-7.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+98.4%+8.5%-12.1%-9.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98632
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.54x0.03x1.05x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$273,613-$81M$3.1B$6M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$448,888$95M$547M$28M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$722,501$14M$3.6B$34M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense41.78x31.43x
BUUU leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BUUU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BUUU five years ago would be worth $50,650 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,019 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, BUUU leads with a +406.5% total return vs MARA's -20.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BUUU at 71.7% vs BTBT's -0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBUUU logoBUUUBUUU Group Limite…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+173.4%-3.9%+28.4%-5.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+406.5%-8.8%-20.3%-6.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+406.5%-1.0%+42.6%+4.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+406.5%-79.8%-44.3%-67.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+406.5%-57.6%-57.0%-77.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+71.7%-0.3%+12.6%+1.5%
BUUU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BUUU and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUUU currently trades 78.0% from its 52-week high vs BTBT's 43.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBUUU logoBUUUBUUU Group Limite…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.00x3.41x3.10x0.19x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$25.99$4.55$23.45$1.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.67$1.25$6.66$0.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.0%+43.1%+54.2%+50.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.871.469.747.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded16K19.6M46.0M15K
Evenly matched — BUUU and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 155.1% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 26.8% for MARA (target: $16). For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 13.92% vs BTBT's 0.29%.

MetricBUUU logoBUUUBUUU Group Limite…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00$16.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts219
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+13.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CLPS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). BUUU leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallBUUU Group Limited Class A … (BUUU)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BUUU vs BTBT vs MARA vs CLPS: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BUUU or BTBT or MARA or CLPS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 2% for CLPS Incorporation (CLPS). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BUUU or BTBT or MARA or CLPS?

On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus BUUU Group Limited Class A Ordinary Share at 400. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BUUU or BTBT or MARA or CLPS?

Over the past 5 years, BUUU Group Limited Class A Ordinary Share (BUUU) delivered a total return of +406.

5%, compared to -79. 8% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BUUU returned +406. 5% versus CLPS's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BUUU or BTBT or MARA or CLPS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

19β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning BTBT is approximately 1653% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BUUU or BTBT or MARA or CLPS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus 15. 2% for CLPS Incorporation (CLPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BUUU or BTBT or MARA or CLPS?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BUUU leads at 17. 7% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — BUUU or BTBT or MARA or CLPS?

In this comparison, CLPS (13.

9% yield), BTBT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. BUUU, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is BUUU or BTBT or MARA or CLPS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

19), 13. 9% yield). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -77. 7%, BTBT: -57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between BUUU and BTBT and MARA and CLPS?

These companies operate in different sectors (BUUU (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and CLPS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

CLPS pays a dividend while BUUU, BTBT, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BUUU

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 32%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BUUU and BTBT and MARA and CLPS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BUUU: 64.2% · BTBT: 264.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(BUUU: 14.4% · BTBT: 17.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BUUU: 400.4x · BTBT: 9.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.