Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BV vs SERV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
BV vs SERV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $1.21B | $560M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.73B | $5M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $-137M |
| Gross Margin | 22.0% | -441.1% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | -28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $913M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $106M |
BV vs SERV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrightView Holdings… (BV) | 100 | 109.1 | +9.1% |
| Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) | 100 | 176.5 | +76.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BV vs SERV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.13, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 50.7%, current ratio 1.30x
- Beta 1.13, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.30x
SERV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 46.3%, EPS growth -52.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 190.8%
- 70.9% 10Y total return vs BV's -39.3%
- 46.3% revenue growth vs BV's -3.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.3% revenue growth vs BV's -3.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.4% margin vs SERV's -26.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.13 vs SERV's 4.09 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.8% vs BV's -10.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs SERV's -44.9%, ROIC 3.9% vs -64.9% |
BV vs SERV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BV vs SERV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BV is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.7B annually — 525.3x SERV's $5M. BV is the more profitable business, keeping 1.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SERV's -26.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $5M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $265M | -$142M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | -$137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | -$148M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | -4.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -26.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | -28.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -189.2% | -80.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BV leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $560M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $459M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.77x | -5.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.62x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.69x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 211.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.70x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.17x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BV delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-47 for SERV. SERV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BV's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BV scores 4/9 vs SERV's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | -47.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | -44.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | -64.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | -46.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $839M | -$101M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $913M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.00x | -14706.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BV and SERV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SERV five years ago would be worth $17,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,930 for BV. Over the past 12 months, SERV leads with a +51.8% total return vs BV's -10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BV at 26.4% vs SERV's 19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.0% | -23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.7% | +51.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.9% | +70.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.7% | +70.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.3% | +70.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | +19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BV is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SERV's 4.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BV currently trades 75.9% from its 52-week high vs SERV's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 4.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.11 | $18.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.06 | $5.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.9% | +48.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.0 | 53.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 531K | 3.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BV as "Buy" and SERV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.6% upside for SERV (target: $16) vs 4.2% for BV (target: $14). BV is the only dividend payer here at 2.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.53 | $16.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.37 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | 0.0% |
BV leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
BV vs SERV: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BV or SERV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Serve Robotics Inc.
(SERV) is the stronger pick with 46. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV). BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BV or SERV?
Over the past 5 years, Serve Robotics Inc.
(SERV) delivered a total return of +70. 9%, compared to -30. 7% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SERV returned +70. 9% versus BV's -39. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BV or SERV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BrightView Holdings, Inc.
(BV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 13β versus Serve Robotics Inc. 's 4. 09β — meaning SERV is approximately 262% more volatile than BV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 51% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BV or SERV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Serve Robotics Inc.
(SERV) is pulling ahead at 46. 3% versus -3. 4% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BrightView Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 185. 0% year-over-year, compared to -52. 3% for Serve Robotics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SERV leads at 190. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BV or SERV?
BrightView Holdings, Inc.
(BV) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 1% net margin versus -38. 2% for Serve Robotics Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BV leads at 5. 0% versus -42. 5% for SERV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BV leads at 23. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BV or SERV more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SERV: 79.
6% to $16. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — BV or SERV?
In this comparison, BV (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SERV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BV or SERV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BrightView Holdings, Inc.
(BV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), 2. 8% yield). Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) carries a higher beta of 4. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BV: -39. 3%, SERV: +70. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BV and SERV?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SERV is a small-cap high-growth stock. BV pays a dividend while SERV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.