Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BV vs SITE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BV
BrightView Holdings, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.11B
5Y Perf.-3.4%
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.36B
5Y Perf.+15.0%

BV vs SITE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BV logoBV
SITE logoSITE
IndustrySpecialty Business ServicesIndustrial - Distribution
Market Cap$1.11B$5.36B
Revenue (TTM)$2.73B$4.71B
Net Income (TTM)$38M$153M
Gross Margin22.0%34.9%
Operating Margin4.5%5.1%
Forward P/E17.9x28.0x
Total Debt$913M$980M
Cash & Equiv.$75M$191M

BV vs SITELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BV
SITE
StockMay 20May 26Return
BrightView Holdings… (BV)10096.6-3.4%
SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE)100115.0+15.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BV vs SITE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SITE leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. BrightView Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BV
BrightView Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

BV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.13, yield 3.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 50.7%, current ratio 1.30x
  • Beta 1.13, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.30x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
The Growth Play

SITE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
  • 353.9% 10Y total return vs BV's -44.8%
  • 3.6% revenue growth vs BV's -3.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSITE logoSITE3.6% revenue growth vs BV's -3.4%
ValueBV logoBVLower P/E (17.9x vs 28.0x)
Quality / MarginsSITE logoSITE3.2% margin vs BV's 1.4%
Stability / SafetyBV logoBVBeta 1.13 vs SITE's 1.24, lower leverage
DividendsBV logoBV3.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SITE logoSITE+0.2% vs BV's -17.8%
Efficiency (ROA)SITE logoSITE4.6% ROA vs BV's 1.1%, ROIC 7.3% vs 3.9%

BV vs SITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BVBrightView Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Landscape Maintenance
88.9%$1.7B
Snow Removal
11.1%$211M
SITESiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
FY 2025
Landscaping Products
76.9%$3.6B
Agronomic
23.1%$1.1B

BV vs SITE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSITELAGGINGBV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

SITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 1.7x BV's $2.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.2% (SITE) to 1.4% (BV). On growth, BV holds the edge at +6.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBV logoBVBrightView Holdin…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.7B$4.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$265M$382M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$38M$153M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$6M$246M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.0%+34.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.5%+5.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.4%+3.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.2%+5.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.1%+0.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.2%+1.6%
SITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 20.7x trailing earnings, BV trades at a 42% valuation discount to SITE's 35.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BV's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SITE's 16.2x.

MetricBV logoBVBrightView Holdin…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$5.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.0B$6.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.72x35.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.94x28.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate8.66x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.37x16.24x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.42x1.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.64x3.24x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF29.59x21.73x
BV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SITE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

SITE delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $2 for BV. BV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SITE's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs BV's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBV logoBVBrightView Holdin…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.3%+9.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+4.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.9%+7.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.7%+9.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–948
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.51x0.58x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$839M$789M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$75M$191M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$913M$980M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.00x6.79x
SITE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — BV and SITE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BV five years ago would be worth $6,500 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,256 for SITE. Over the past 12 months, SITE leads with a +0.2% total return vs BV's -17.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BV at 21.8% vs SITE's -7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBV logoBVBrightView Holdin…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.3%-3.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-17.8%+0.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+80.6%-20.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-35.0%-37.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.8%+353.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+21.8%-7.5%
Evenly matched — BV and SITE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BV and SITE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BV is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SITE's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricBV logoBVBrightView Holdin…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.13x1.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.11$168.56
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.06$112.23
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+69.0%+71.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.138.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded502K686K
Evenly matched — BV and SITE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates BV as "Buy" and SITE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.1% upside for SITE (target: $162) vs 14.6% for BV (target: $14). BV is the only dividend payer here at 3.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBV logoBVBrightView Holdin…SITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.53$162.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts1315
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises22
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.2%+1.8%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

SITE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallSiteOne Landscape Supply, I… (SITE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BV vs SITE: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BV or SITE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.

(SITE) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV). BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) offers the better valuation at 20. 7x trailing P/E (17. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BV or SITE?

On trailing P/E, BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) is the cheapest at 20. 7x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, BrightView Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BV or SITE?

Over the past 5 years, BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) delivered a total return of -35. 0%, compared to -37. 4% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SITE returned +358. 3% versus BV's -38. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BV or SITE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 13β versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 1. 24β — meaning SITE is approximately 10% more volatile than BV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 58% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BV or SITE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.

(SITE) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -3. 4% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BrightView Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 185. 0% year-over-year, compared to 24. 4% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BV or SITE?

SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.

(SITE) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus 2. 1% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SITE leads at 5. 1% versus 5. 0% for BV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SITE leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BV or SITE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) trades at 17. 9x forward P/E versus 28. 0x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SITE: 34. 1% to $162. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BV or SITE?

In this comparison, BV (3.

1% yield) pays a dividend. SITE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BV or SITE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BV: -38. 2%, SITE: +358. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BV and SITE?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BV pays a dividend while SITE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SITE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BV and SITE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BV: 6.1% · SITE: 0.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BV: 20.7x · SITE: 35.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.