Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BV vs SITE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
BV vs SITE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $5.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.73B | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $153M |
| Gross Margin | 22.0% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 17.9x | 28.0x |
| Total Debt | $913M | $980M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $191M |
BV vs SITE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrightView Holdings… (BV) | 100 | 96.6 | -3.4% |
| SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE) | 100 | 115.0 | +15.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BV vs SITE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.13, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 50.7%, current ratio 1.30x
- Beta 1.13, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.30x
SITE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- 353.9% 10Y total return vs BV's -44.8%
- 3.6% revenue growth vs BV's -3.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs BV's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.9x vs 28.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs BV's 1.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.13 vs SITE's 1.24, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +0.2% vs BV's -17.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs BV's 1.1%, ROIC 7.3% vs 3.9% |
BV vs SITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BV vs SITE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 1.7x BV's $2.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.2% (SITE) to 1.4% (BV). On growth, BV holds the edge at +6.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $265M | $382M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $246M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +34.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | +1.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.7x trailing earnings, BV trades at a 42% valuation discount to SITE's 35.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BV's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SITE's 16.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $6.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.72x | 35.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.94x | 28.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 8.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.37x | 16.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 1.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 3.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.59x | 21.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SITE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SITE delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $2 for BV. BV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SITE's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs BV's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.3% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $839M | $789M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $191M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $913M | $980M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.00x | 6.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BV and SITE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BV five years ago would be worth $6,500 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,256 for SITE. Over the past 12 months, SITE leads with a +0.2% total return vs BV's -17.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BV at 21.8% vs SITE's -7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.3% | -3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.8% | +0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.6% | -20.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.0% | -37.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.8% | +353.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.8% | -7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BV and SITE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BV is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SITE's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.11 | $168.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.06 | $112.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.0% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.1 | 38.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 502K | 686K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BV as "Buy" and SITE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.1% upside for SITE (target: $162) vs 14.6% for BV (target: $14). BV is the only dividend payer here at 3.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.53 | $162.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.37 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +1.8% |
SITE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BV vs SITE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BV or SITE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV). BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) offers the better valuation at 20. 7x trailing P/E (17. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BV or SITE?
On trailing P/E, BrightView Holdings, Inc.
(BV) is the cheapest at 20. 7x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, BrightView Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BV or SITE?
Over the past 5 years, BrightView Holdings, Inc.
(BV) delivered a total return of -35. 0%, compared to -37. 4% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SITE returned +358. 3% versus BV's -38. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BV or SITE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BrightView Holdings, Inc.
(BV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 13β versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 1. 24β — meaning SITE is approximately 10% more volatile than BV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 58% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BV or SITE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -3. 4% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BrightView Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 185. 0% year-over-year, compared to 24. 4% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BV or SITE?
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus 2. 1% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SITE leads at 5. 1% versus 5. 0% for BV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SITE leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BV or SITE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BrightView Holdings, Inc.
(BV) trades at 17. 9x forward P/E versus 28. 0x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SITE: 34. 1% to $162. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — BV or SITE?
In this comparison, BV (3.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SITE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BV or SITE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BrightView Holdings, Inc.
(BV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BV: -38. 2%, SITE: +358. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BV and SITE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BV pays a dividend while SITE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.