BV vs TROX

For growth investors, BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) is the stronger pick with -3. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (17. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) delivered a total return of -25. 5%, compared to -47. 9% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TROX returned +104. 7% versus BV's -38. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 13β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 109% more volatile than BV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) is pulling ahead at -3. 4% versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BrightView Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 185. 0% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, BV leads at -1. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 1% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 2. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BV leads at 5. 0% versus -0. 7% for TROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BV leads at 23. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BV: 2.

3% to $13. 53.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 8% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV).

For long-horizon retirement investors, BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), 2. 8% yield). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BV: -38. 2%, TROX: +104. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (BV (Industrials) and TROX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.