Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BV vs SITE vs TROX vs LMND vs ABM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
Chemicals
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Specialty Business Services
BV vs SITE vs TROX vs LMND vs ABM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Industrial - Distribution | Chemicals | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $1.21B | $5.54B | $1.34B | $4.18B | $2.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.73B | $4.71B | $2.92B | $821M | $8.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $153M | $-359M | $-139M | $158M |
| Gross Margin | 22.0% | 34.9% | 5.8% | 47.6% | 11.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 5.1% | -4.8% | -16.3% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 28.7x | — | — | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $913M | $980M | $3.59B | $182M | $1.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $191M | $211M | $385M | $104M |
BV vs SITE vs TROX vs LMND vs ABM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrightView Holdings… (BV) | 100 | 107.1 | +7.1% |
| SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE) | 100 | 97.6 | -2.4% |
| Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) | 100 | 110.4 | +10.4% |
| Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) | 100 | 93.6 | -6.4% |
| ABM Industries Inco… (ABM) | 100 | 113.5 | +13.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BV vs SITE vs TROX vs LMND vs ABM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, BV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SITE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 368.6% 10Y total return vs ABM's 48.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 58.2%, current ratio 2.47x
- 3.2% margin vs LMND's -16.9%
- 4.6% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 7.3% vs -0.3%
TROX is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.37, yield 3.6%, current ratio 2.46x
- 3.6% yield, vs ABM's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
LMND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- 40.2% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7%
- +78.2% vs ABM's -16.0%
ABM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.6%
- PEG 0.04 vs SITE's 6.91
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.72 vs LMND's 2.75
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs LMND's -16.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs LMND's 2.75 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, vs ABM's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.2% vs ABM's -16.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 7.3% vs -0.3% |
BV vs SITE vs TROX vs LMND vs ABM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BV vs SITE vs TROX vs LMND vs ABM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABM leads in 1 of 6 categories
SITE leads 1 • LMND leads 1 • BV leads 0 • TROX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SITE and LMND each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABM is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.9B annually — 10.8x LMND's $821M. SITE is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LMND's -16.9%. On growth, LMND holds the edge at +55.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $4.7B | $2.9B | $821M | $8.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $265M | $382M | $166M | -$121M | $431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | $153M | -$359M | -$139M | $158M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $246M | -$139M | $20M | $327M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +34.9% | +5.8% | +47.6% | +11.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +5.1% | -4.8% | -16.3% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +3.2% | -12.3% | -16.9% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +5.2% | -4.8% | +2.4% | +3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | +0.1% | +3.0% | +55.0% | +6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -189.2% | +1.6% | +7.1% | +45.3% | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ABM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, ABM trades at a 58% valuation discount to SITE's 37.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ABM offers better value at 0.05x vs SITE's 8.94x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $5.5B | $1.3B | $4.2B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $6.3B | $4.7B | $4.0B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.77x | 37.08x | -2.83x | -23.67x | 15.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.62x | 28.67x | — | — | 10.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 8.94x | — | — | 0.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.69x | 16.70x | 16.80x | — | 9.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 1.18x | 0.46x | 5.67x | 0.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.70x | 3.35x | 0.92x | 7.33x | 1.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.17x | 22.44x | — | — | 15.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SITE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SITE delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-30 for TROX. LMND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TROX's 2.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs TROX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | +9.1% | -30.4% | -26.5% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +4.6% | -7.7% | -7.4% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +7.3% | -0.3% | -36.8% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | +9.6% | -0.4% | -22.7% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.58x | 2.48x | 0.34x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $839M | $789M | $3.4B | -$203M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $191M | $211M | $385M | $104M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $913M | $980M | $3.6B | $182M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.00x | 6.79x | -1.16x | — | 3.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LMND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABM five years ago would be worth $8,586 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,493 for TROX. Over the past 12 months, LMND leads with a +78.2% total return vs ABM's -16.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LMND at 49.6% vs TROX's -8.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.0% | -0.1% | +98.1% | -28.3% | -3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.7% | +5.6% | +76.9% | +78.2% | -16.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.9% | -18.7% | -23.6% | +234.7% | +3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.7% | -38.4% | -55.1% | -31.2% | -14.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.3% | +368.6% | +116.1% | -21.6% | +48.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | -6.7% | -8.6% | +49.6% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TROX and ABM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABM is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMND's 2.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TROX currently trades 79.4% from its 52-week high vs LMND's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 1.24x | 2.37x | 2.75x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.11 | $168.56 | $10.59 | $99.90 | $52.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.06 | $112.23 | $2.86 | $28.71 | $36.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.9% | +74.1% | +79.4% | +54.5% | +77.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.0 | 36.8 | 58.5 | 36.3 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 531K | 689K | 3.1M | 1.9M | 512K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TROX and ABM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BV as "Buy", SITE as "Buy", TROX as "Buy", LMND as "Buy", ABM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 33.5% upside for LMND (target: $73) vs -13.8% for TROX (target: $7). For income investors, TROX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs ABM's 2.57%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.53 | $162.29 | $7.25 | $72.67 | $50.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 15 | 17 | 15 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | — | +3.6% | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 0 | — | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.37 | — | $0.30 | — | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.1% |
ABM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SITE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
BV vs SITE vs TROX vs LMND vs ABM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BV or SITE or TROX or LMND or ABM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.
(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BV or SITE or TROX or LMND or ABM?
On trailing P/E, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the cheapest at 15.
7x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. at 37. 1x. On forward P/E, ABM Industries Incorporated is actually cheaper at 10. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ABM Industries Incorporated wins at 0. 04x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BV or SITE or TROX or LMND or ABM?
Over the past 5 years, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) delivered a total return of -14.
1%, compared to -55. 1% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SITE returned +368. 6% versus BV's -39. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BV or SITE or TROX or LMND or ABM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
72β versus Lemonade, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning LMND is approximately 280% more volatile than ABM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BV or SITE or TROX or LMND or ABM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.
(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BrightView Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 185. 0% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, LMND leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BV or SITE or TROX or LMND or ABM?
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -22. 4% for Lemonade, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SITE leads at 5. 1% versus -21. 8% for LMND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LMND leads at 40. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BV or SITE or TROX or LMND or ABM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 28. 7x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — 18. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LMND: 33. 5% to $72. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — BV or SITE or TROX or LMND or ABM?
In this comparison, TROX (3.
6% yield), BV (2. 8% yield), ABM (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SITE, LMND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BV or SITE or TROX or LMND or ABM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 2. 6% yield). Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) carries a higher beta of 2. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABM: +48. 7%, LMND: -21. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BV and SITE and TROX and LMND and ABM?
These companies operate in different sectors (BV (Industrials) and SITE (Industrials) and TROX (Basic Materials) and LMND (Financial Services) and ABM (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LMND is a small-cap high-growth stock; ABM is a small-cap deep-value stock. BV, TROX, ABM pay a dividend while SITE, LMND do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.