Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BVFL vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
BVFL vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $178M | $2.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $902M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 76.6% | 73.6% |
| Operating Margin | 32.4% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $36M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $185M |
BVFL vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL) | 100 | 127.1 | +27.1% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 151.8 | +51.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BVFL vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BVFL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.44
- 214.4% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 103.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 19.5%, current ratio 4.18x
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- PEG 1.59 vs BVFL's 2.38
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs BVFL's 6.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs BVFL's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 14.2x), PEG 1.59 vs 2.38 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.44 vs NBTB's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.2% vs NBTB's +20.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
BVFL vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BVFL vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BVFL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $902M annually — 17.2x BVFL's $52M. BVFL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NBTB's 18.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $902M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.6% | +73.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.8% | +24.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 1% valuation discount to BVFL's 14.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.99x vs BVFL's 2.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $178M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $208M | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.22x | 14.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.38x | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.85x | 10.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.39x | 2.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.47x | 11.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BVFL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for BVFL. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BVFL's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BVFL scores 8/9 vs NBTB's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.33x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $14,690 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,313 for BVFL. Over the past 12 months, BVFL leads with a +42.2% total return vs NBTB's +20.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBTB at 14.5% vs BVFL's -0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +14.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.2% | +20.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.3% | +49.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.1% | +46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +214.4% | +103.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.1% | +14.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BVFL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BVFL is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.75 | $48.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.05 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 51.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 277K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
NBTB is the only dividend payer here at 3.06% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.9% | +0.4% |
BVFL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
BVFL vs NBTB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BVFL or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BVFL or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus BV Financial, Inc. at 14. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BVFL or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +46. 9%, compared to +13. 1% for BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BVFL returned +214. 4% versus NBTB's +103. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BVFL or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BV Financial, Inc.
(BVFL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 44β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning NBTB is approximately 64% more volatile than BVFL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 19% for BV Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BVFL or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 6. 6% for BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BV Financial, Inc. grew EPS 30. 0% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BVFL or NBTB?
BV Financial, Inc.
(BVFL) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 7% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BVFL leads at 32. 4% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BVFL leads at 76. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — BVFL or NBTB?
In this comparison, NBTB (3.
1% yield) pays a dividend. BVFL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BVFL or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 3. 1% yield, +103. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +103. 1%, BVFL: +214. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BVFL and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
NBTB pays a dividend while BVFL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.