Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BVFL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
BVFL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $178M | $2.44B | $205M | $75.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $902M | $90M | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $169M | $14M | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 76.6% | 73.6% | 54.7% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 32.4% | 24.3% | 7.0% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 11.2x | 11.7x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $36M | $327M | $52M | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $185M | $119M | $837M |
BVFL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL) | 100 | 127.1 | +27.1% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 151.8 | +51.8% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 311.1 | +211.1% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 146.2 | +46.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BVFL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BVFL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 214.4% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 121.2%
- NIM 4.0% vs CZWI's 2.9%
NBTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- PEG 1.59 vs BVFL's 2.38
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.42, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- +62.6% vs ICE's -24.4%
ICE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and stability is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.38 vs NBTB's 0.73
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 16.5x), PEG 1.59 vs 1.86 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs NBTB's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.6% vs ICE's -24.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
BVFL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BVFL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
BVFL leads 1 • ICE leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BVFL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 241.0x BVFL's $52M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $902M | $90M | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | $241M | $9M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $169M | $14M | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $225M | $11M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.6% | +73.6% | +54.7% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +24.3% | +7.0% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +18.8% | +16.0% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.8% | +24.9% | +12.4% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +39.5% | +63.0% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 40% valuation discount to ICE's 23.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.99x vs CZWI's 2.88x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $178M | $2.4B | $205M | $75.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $208M | $2.6B | $138M | $95.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.22x | 14.02x | 14.62x | 23.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.18x | 11.73x | 16.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.38x | 1.99x | 2.88x | 2.61x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.85x | 10.70x | 15.56x | 14.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.39x | 2.81x | 2.28x | 6.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.25x | 1.10x | 2.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.47x | 11.13x | 19.79x | 17.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for BVFL. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +9.5% | +7.8% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +2.4% | +0.6% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | $142M | -$67M | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $185M | $119M | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $327M | $52M | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.33x | 1.05x | 0.16x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,412 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,313 for BVFL. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +62.6% total return vs ICE's -24.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 35.7% vs BVFL's -0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +14.0% | +23.6% | -15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.2% | +20.5% | +62.6% | -24.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.3% | +49.9% | +149.8% | +24.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.1% | +46.9% | +64.1% | +26.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +214.4% | +103.1% | +121.2% | +192.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.1% | +14.5% | +35.7% | +7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BVFL and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BVFL currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.73x | 0.42x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.75 | $48.81 | $22.62 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.05 | $39.20 | $12.83 | $132.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +95.6% | +94.3% | +70.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 51.0 | 56.8 | 29.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 277K | 48K | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.9% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs -1.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.06% vs ICE's 1.45%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | — | $194.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 2 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.1% | +1.7% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 6 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.43 | $0.37 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.9% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +1.8% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). BVFL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
BVFL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BVFL or NBTB or CZWI or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BVFL or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 23. 2x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 59x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 31x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BVFL or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +64. 1%, compared to +13. 1% for BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BVFL returned +214. 4% versus NBTB's +103. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BVFL or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning NBTB is approximately 94% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BVFL or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BV Financial, Inc. grew EPS 30. 0% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BVFL or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BVFL leads at 76. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BVFL or NBTB or CZWI or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 59x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 31x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 44. 9% to $194. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BVFL or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
In this comparison, NBTB (3.
1% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield), ICE (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. BVFL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BVFL or NBTB or CZWI or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 1. 4% yield, +192. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +192. 5%, BVFL: +214. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BVFL and NBTB and CZWI and ICE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BVFL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NBTB, CZWI, ICE pay a dividend while BVFL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.