Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BW vs SWK vs NUE vs AMSC vs GE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Steel
Industrial - Machinery
Aerospace & Defense
BW vs SWK vs NUE vs AMSC vs GE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Steel | Industrial - Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $1.65B | $12.47B | $51.64B | $2.56B | $316.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $635M | $15.23B | $34.16B | $279M | $48.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-36M | $371M | $2.33B | $130M | $8.66B |
| Gross Margin | 25.5% | 30.0% | 14.0% | 30.6% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 7.8% | 10.0% | 4.9% | 18.5% |
| Forward P/E | 80.4x | 17.8x | 15.9x | 15.9x | 39.3x |
| Total Debt | $193M | $5.86B | $7.12B | $3M | $20.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $90M | $280M | $2.26B | $79M | $12.39B |
BW vs SWK vs NUE vs AMSC vs GE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Babcock & Wilcox En… (BW) | 100 | 676.3 | +576.3% |
| Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
| Nucor Corporation (NUE) | 100 | 538.3 | +438.3% |
| American Supercondu… (AMSC) | 100 | 761.2 | +661.2% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 908.4 | +808.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BW vs SWK vs NUE vs AMSC vs GE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +34.8% vs SWK's +41.7%
SWK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 4.1%
- 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs GE's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
NUE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 426.7% 10Y total return vs AMSC's 379.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 32.2%, current ratio 2.94x
- PEG 0.61 vs GE's 3.33
- Beta 1.03, yield 1.0%, current ratio 2.94x
AMSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 143.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs BW's -18.1%
- 46.7% margin vs BW's -5.7%
- 18.1% ROA vs BW's -5.3%, ROIC -0.9% vs 16.9%
Among these 5 stocks, GE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs BW's -18.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 39.3x), PEG 0.61 vs 3.33 | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.7% margin vs BW's -5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs BW's 3.75 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs GE's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.8% vs SWK's +41.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.1% ROA vs BW's -5.3%, ROIC -0.9% vs 16.9% |
BW vs SWK vs NUE vs AMSC vs GE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BW vs SWK vs NUE vs AMSC vs GE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SWK leads in 2 of 6 categories
GE leads 1 • AMSC leads 1 • NUE leads 1 • BW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GE is the larger business by revenue, generating $48.4B annually — 173.1x AMSC's $279M. AMSC is the more profitable business, keeping 46.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BW's -5.7%. On growth, BW holds the edge at +142.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $635M | $15.2B | $34.2B | $279M | $48.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $43M | $1.7B | $4.9B | $18M | $9.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$36M | $371M | $2.3B | $130M | $8.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$86M | $726M | $532M | $16M | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +30.0% | +14.0% | +30.6% | +34.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +7.8% | +10.0% | +4.9% | +18.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +2.4% | +6.8% | +46.7% | +17.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | +4.8% | +1.6% | +5.7% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +142.9% | +2.7% | +21.3% | +21.4% | +24.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.4% | -35.0% | +3.8% | +39.9% | -1.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SWK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.1x trailing earnings, NUE trades at a 91% valuation discount to AMSC's 332.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NUE offers better value at 1.16x vs GE's 3.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $12.5B | $51.6B | $2.6B | $316.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $18.0B | $56.5B | $2.5B | $324.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -30.96x | 30.26x | 30.15x | 332.63x | 37.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 80.38x | 17.83x | 15.90x | 15.94x | 39.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.16x | — | 3.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 53.16x | 11.71x | 13.65x | 454.16x | 32.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.81x | 0.82x | 1.59x | 11.47x | 6.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.35x | 2.37x | 10.18x | 17.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.12x | — | 98.78x | 43.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GE delivers a 45.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $4 for SWK. AMSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GE's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NUE scores 7/9 vs BW's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +4.1% | +10.6% | +24.3% | +45.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | +1.7% | +6.7% | +18.1% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.9% | +5.8% | +7.7% | -0.9% | +24.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | +7.0% | +8.9% | -0.6% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.65x | 0.32x | 0.02x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $103M | $5.6B | $4.9B | -$76M | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $90M | $280M | $2.3B | $79M | $12.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $193M | $5.9B | $7.1B | $3M | $20.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.97x | 2.07x | 29.72x | — | 11.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BW and AMSC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GE five years ago would be worth $46,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,381 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, BW leads with a +3477.3% total return vs SWK's +41.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMSC at 139.0% vs SWK's 2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +134.0% | +5.9% | +34.2% | +68.5% | -5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3477.3% | +41.7% | +98.8% | +156.9% | +44.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.2% | +6.9% | +64.7% | +1264.6% | +280.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.7% | -56.2% | +140.0% | +255.0% | +362.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | -1.5% | +426.7% | +379.0% | +121.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.8% | +2.2% | +18.1% | +139.0% | +56.0% |
Risk & Volatility
NUE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NUE is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BW's 3.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs AMSC's 75.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.68x | 1.83x | 1.01x | 2.98x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.80 | $93.37 | $235.44 | $70.49 | $348.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.41 | $58.23 | $106.21 | $20.43 | $208.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.0% | +85.9% | +96.3% | +75.5% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 61.0 | 85.9 | 74.0 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.3M | 2.0M | 1.4M | 1.1M | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BW as "Hold", SWK as "Hold", NUE as "Buy", AMSC as "Buy", GE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.6% upside for GE (target: $386) vs -2.4% for BW (target: $15). For income investors, SWK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs GE's 0.45%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $89.17 | $222.83 | $52.00 | $386.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 37 | 32 | 15 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +4.1% | +1.0% | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 16 | 15 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | $3.29 | $2.22 | — | $1.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.1% | +1.4% | +0.0% | +2.4% |
SWK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). GE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
BW vs SWK vs NUE vs AMSC vs GE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BW or SWK or NUE or AMSC or GE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW). Nucor Corporation (NUE) offers the better valuation at 30. 1x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nucor Corporation (NUE) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BW or SWK or NUE or AMSC or GE?
On trailing P/E, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the cheapest at 30.
1x versus American Superconductor Corporation at 332. 6x. On forward P/E, Nucor Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Nucor Corporation wins at 0. 61x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BW or SWK or NUE or AMSC or GE?
Over the past 5 years, GE Aerospace (GE) delivered a total return of +362.
5%, compared to -56. 2% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUE returned +428. 5% versus BW's -93. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BW or SWK or NUE or AMSC or GE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
01β versus Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. 's 3. 68β — meaning BW is approximately 263% more volatile than NUE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 108% for GE Aerospace — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BW or SWK or NUE or AMSC or GE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus -18. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Superconductor Corporation grew EPS 143. 2% year-over-year, compared to -11. 1% for Nucor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMSC leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BW or SWK or NUE or AMSC or GE?
GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
0% net margin versus -6. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GE leads at 19. 1% versus -0. 5% for AMSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GE leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BW or SWK or NUE or AMSC or GE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 61x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Nucor Corporation (NUE) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 80. 4x for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. — 64. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GE: 27. 6% to $386. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — BW or SWK or NUE or AMSC or GE?
In this comparison, SWK (4.
1% yield), NUE (1. 0% yield), BW (1. 0% yield), GE (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. AMSC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BW or SWK or NUE or AMSC or GE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
01), 1. 0% yield, +428. 5% 10Y return). American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NUE: +428. 5%, AMSC: +396. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BW and SWK and NUE and AMSC and GE?
These companies operate in different sectors (BW (Industrials) and SWK (Industrials) and NUE (Basic Materials) and AMSC (Industrials) and GE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; NUE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock. BW, SWK, NUE pay a dividend while AMSC, GE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.