Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BWEN vs AMSC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BWEN
Broadwind, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$46M
5Y Perf.-24.4%
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.74B
5Y Perf.+687.2%

BWEN vs AMSC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BWEN logoBWEN
AMSC logoAMSC
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryIndustrial - Machinery
Market Cap$46M$2.74B
Revenue (TTM)$158M$279M
Net Income (TTM)$5M$130M
Gross Margin10.1%30.6%
Operating Margin0.3%4.9%
Forward P/E8.6x16.5x
Total Debt$28M$3M
Cash & Equiv.$456K$79M

BWEN vs AMSCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BWEN
AMSC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN)10075.6-24.4%
American Supercondu… (AMSC)100787.2+687.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BWEN vs AMSC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMSC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Broadwind, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BWEN
Broadwind, Inc.
The Income Pick

BWEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.71
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.71, Low D/E 42.7%, current ratio 2.03x
  • Beta 1.71, current ratio 2.03x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
The Growth Play

AMSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 143.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
  • 398.9% 10Y total return vs BWEN's -41.6%
  • 53.0% revenue growth vs BWEN's 10.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMSC logoAMSC53.0% revenue growth vs BWEN's 10.4%
ValueBWEN logoBWENLower P/E (8.6x vs 16.5x)
Quality / MarginsAMSC logoAMSC46.7% margin vs BWEN's 3.3%
Stability / SafetyBWEN logoBWENBeta 1.71 vs AMSC's 2.90
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMSC logoAMSC+173.7% vs BWEN's +32.0%
Efficiency (ROA)AMSC logoAMSC18.1% ROA vs BWEN's 4.2%, ROIC -0.9% vs 0.4%

BWEN vs AMSC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BWENBroadwind, Inc.
FY 2025
Heavy Fabrications
63.7%$101M
Industrial Solutions
19.1%$30M
Gearing
17.2%$27M
AMSCAmerican Superconductor Corporation
FY 2024
Grid
82.7%$170M
Wind
17.3%$36M

BWEN vs AMSC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMSCLAGGINGBWEN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMSC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMSC is the larger business by revenue, generating $279M annually — 1.8x BWEN's $158M. AMSC is the more profitable business, keeping 46.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWEN's 3.3%. On growth, AMSC holds the edge at +21.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBWEN logoBWENBroadwind, Inc.AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$158M$279M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7M$18M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$130M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$19M$16M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.1%+30.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.3%+4.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.3%+46.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.0%+5.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.4%+21.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.7%+39.9%
AMSC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BWEN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 8.6x trailing earnings, BWEN trades at a 98% valuation discount to AMSC's 356.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BWEN's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMSC's 488.0x.

MetricBWEN logoBWENBroadwind, Inc.AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…
Market CapShares × price$46M$2.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$74M$2.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.61x356.69x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.48x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.91x488.02x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.29x12.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.69x10.92x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF105.92x
BWEN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMSC leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

AMSC delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $8 for BWEN. AMSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWEN's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSC scores 7/9 vs BWEN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBWEN logoBWENBroadwind, Inc.AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.3%+24.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.2%+18.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.4%-0.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.5%-0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.43x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$28M-$76M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$456,000$79M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$28M$3M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.56x
AMSC leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMSC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMSC five years ago would be worth $39,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,304 for BWEN. Over the past 12 months, AMSC leads with a +173.7% total return vs BWEN's +32.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMSC at 144.6% vs BWEN's -25.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBWEN logoBWENBroadwind, Inc.AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-31.3%+80.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+32.0%+173.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-58.9%+1363.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-57.0%+292.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-41.6%+398.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-25.7%+144.6%
AMSC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BWEN and AMSC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BWEN is the less volatile stock with a 1.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMSC's 2.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMSC currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs BWEN's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBWEN logoBWENBroadwind, Inc.AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.71x2.90x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.15$70.49
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.45$20.13
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+47.7%+81.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.672.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded161K1.1M
Evenly matched — BWEN and AMSC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
MetricBWEN logoBWENBroadwind, Inc.AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$61.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts15
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

AMSC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BWEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallAmerican Superconductor Cor… (AMSC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BWEN vs AMSC: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BWEN or AMSC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger pick with 53.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN). Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BWEN or AMSC?

On trailing P/E, Broadwind, Inc.

(BWEN) is the cheapest at 8. 6x versus American Superconductor Corporation at 356. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BWEN or AMSC?

Over the past 5 years, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) delivered a total return of +292.

2%, compared to -57. 0% for Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMSC returned +398. 9% versus BWEN's -41. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BWEN or AMSC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadwind, Inc.

(BWEN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 71β versus American Superconductor Corporation's 2. 90β — meaning AMSC is approximately 69% more volatile than BWEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 43% for Broadwind, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BWEN or AMSC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is pulling ahead at 53.

0% versus 10. 4% for Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadwind, Inc. grew EPS 338. 9% year-over-year, compared to 143. 2% for American Superconductor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMSC leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BWEN or AMSC?

Broadwind, Inc.

(BWEN) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 3% net margin versus 2. 7% for American Superconductor Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWEN leads at 0. 3% versus -0. 5% for AMSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMSC leads at 27. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — BWEN or AMSC?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is BWEN or AMSC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+398.

9% 10Y return). Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSC: +398. 9%, BWEN: -41. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between BWEN and AMSC?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BWEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMSC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BWEN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMSC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BWEN and AMSC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BWEN: 12.4% · AMSC: 21.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(BWEN: 3.3% · AMSC: 46.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BWEN: 8.6x · AMSC: 356.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.