Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BWEN vs AMSC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
BWEN vs AMSC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $46M | $2.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $158M | $279M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $130M |
| Gross Margin | 10.1% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.3% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $28M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $456K | $79M |
BWEN vs AMSC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) | 100 | 75.6 | -24.4% |
| American Supercondu… (AMSC) | 100 | 787.2 | +687.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWEN vs AMSC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.71
- Lower volatility, beta 1.71, Low D/E 42.7%, current ratio 2.03x
- Beta 1.71, current ratio 2.03x
AMSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 143.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
- 398.9% 10Y total return vs BWEN's -41.6%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs BWEN's 10.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs BWEN's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 16.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.7% margin vs BWEN's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.71 vs AMSC's 2.90 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +173.7% vs BWEN's +32.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.1% ROA vs BWEN's 4.2%, ROIC -0.9% vs 0.4% |
BWEN vs AMSC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BWEN vs AMSC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMSC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMSC is the larger business by revenue, generating $279M annually — 1.8x BWEN's $158M. AMSC is the more profitable business, keeping 46.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWEN's 3.3%. On growth, AMSC holds the edge at +21.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $158M | $279M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $18M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $130M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +46.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | +5.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | +21.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.7% | +39.9% |
Valuation Metrics
BWEN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.6x trailing earnings, BWEN trades at a 98% valuation discount to AMSC's 356.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BWEN's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMSC's 488.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46M | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $74M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.61x | 356.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.91x | 488.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 12.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.69x | 10.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 105.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSC leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSC delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $8 for BWEN. AMSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWEN's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSC scores 7/9 vs BWEN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.3% | +24.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +18.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.4% | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28M | -$76M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $456,000 | $79M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.56x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMSC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMSC five years ago would be worth $39,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,304 for BWEN. Over the past 12 months, AMSC leads with a +173.7% total return vs BWEN's +32.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMSC at 144.6% vs BWEN's -25.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.3% | +80.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.0% | +173.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.9% | +1363.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.0% | +292.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.6% | +398.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.7% | +144.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BWEN and AMSC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BWEN is the less volatile stock with a 1.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMSC's 2.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMSC currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs BWEN's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.71x | 2.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.15 | $70.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.45 | $20.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.7% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 72.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 161K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $61.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
AMSC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BWEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BWEN vs AMSC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWEN or AMSC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN). Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWEN or AMSC?
On trailing P/E, Broadwind, Inc.
(BWEN) is the cheapest at 8. 6x versus American Superconductor Corporation at 356. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWEN or AMSC?
Over the past 5 years, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) delivered a total return of +292.
2%, compared to -57. 0% for Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMSC returned +398. 9% versus BWEN's -41. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWEN or AMSC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadwind, Inc.
(BWEN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 71β versus American Superconductor Corporation's 2. 90β — meaning AMSC is approximately 69% more volatile than BWEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 43% for Broadwind, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWEN or AMSC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus 10. 4% for Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadwind, Inc. grew EPS 338. 9% year-over-year, compared to 143. 2% for American Superconductor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMSC leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWEN or AMSC?
Broadwind, Inc.
(BWEN) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 3% net margin versus 2. 7% for American Superconductor Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWEN leads at 0. 3% versus -0. 5% for AMSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMSC leads at 27. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — BWEN or AMSC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BWEN or AMSC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+398.
9% 10Y return). Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSC: +398. 9%, BWEN: -41. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BWEN and AMSC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BWEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMSC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.