Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BWFG vs DCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
BWFG vs DCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $417M | $1.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $208M | $730M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $111M |
| Gross Margin | 51.6% | 56.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.3% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $180M | $371M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $225M | $2.35B |
BWFG vs DCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 357.5 | +257.5% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWFG vs DCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWFG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 178.0% 10Y total return vs DCOM's 67.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 59.6%, current ratio 1.89x
- PEG 0.23 vs DCOM's 1.68
DCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 2.7%
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs BWFG's 6.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs BWFG's 6.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 10.7x), PEG 0.23 vs 1.68 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs DCOM's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs DCOM's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs BWFG's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.9% vs DCOM's +45.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs DCOM's 0.3% |
BWFG vs DCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BWFG vs DCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DCOM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $730M annually — 3.5x BWFG's $208M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.9% (BWFG) to 15.2% (DCOM).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $208M | $730M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $53M | $161M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $111M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $182M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.6% | +56.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +25.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BWFG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.8x trailing earnings, BWFG trades at a 25% valuation discount to DCOM's 15.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.28x vs DCOM's 2.46x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $417M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $372M | -$345M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.76x | 15.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.66x | 10.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | 2.46x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.08x | -2.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.01x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.97x | 8.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BWFG delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $8 for DCOM. DCOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWFG's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCOM scores 8/9 vs BWFG's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.2% | +7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.0% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$45M | -$2.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $225M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $180M | $371M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.49x | 0.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BWFG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWFG five years ago would be worth $19,609 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,433 for DCOM. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +58.9% total return vs DCOM's +45.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BWFG at 34.9% vs DCOM's 31.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.6% | +26.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.9% | +45.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.4% | +128.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.1% | +24.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.0% | +67.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.9% | +31.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BWFG and DCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BWFG is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DCOM's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.86 | $37.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.20 | $24.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 269K |
Analyst Outlook
DCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BWFG as "Buy" and DCOM as "Hold". For income investors, DCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.68% vs BWFG's 1.53%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% |
DCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BWFG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
BWFG vs DCOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWFG or DCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 1% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG). Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWFG or DCOM?
On trailing P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the cheapest at 11. 8x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. at 15. 7x. On forward P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 68x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWFG or DCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) delivered a total return of +96. 1%, compared to +24. 3% for Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWFG returned +178. 0% versus DCOM's +67. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWFG or DCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning DCOM is approximately 25% more volatile than BWFG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 60% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWFG or DCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 6. 1% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to 261. 8% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWFG or DCOM?
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 9% net margin versus 15. 2% for Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWFG leads at 23. 3% versus 21. 5% for DCOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DCOM leads at 56. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BWFG or DCOM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 68x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 7x for Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — BWFG or DCOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 5% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG).
09Is BWFG or DCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 1. 5% yield, +178. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BWFG: +178. 0%, DCOM: +67. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BWFG and DCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.