Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
BWMN logo
BWMN
PRIM logo
PRIM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BWMN vs PRIM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$532M
5Y Perf.+124.5%
PRIM
Primoris Services Corporation

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.35B
5Y Perf.+210.3%

BWMN vs PRIM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BWMN logoBWMN
PRIM logoPRIM
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionEngineering & Construction
Market Cap$532M$5.35B
Revenue (TTM)$377M$7.49B
Net Income (TTM)$11M$248M
Gross Margin46.6%10.4%
Operating Margin4.8%4.9%
Forward P/E17.9x20.4x
Total Debt$147M$1.28B
Cash & Equiv.$11M$541M

BWMN vs PRIMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BWMN
PRIM
StockMay 21Jun 26Return
Bowman Consulting G… (BWMN)100224.5+124.5%
Primoris Services C… (PRIM)100310.3+210.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BWMN vs PRIM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PRIM leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇PRIM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
The Growth Play

BWMN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 329.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.3%
  • PEG 0.35 vs PRIM's 1.11
  • Lower P/E (17.9x vs 20.4x), PEG 0.35 vs 1.11
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
PRIM
Primoris Services Corporation
The Income Pick

PRIM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 0.3%
  • 415.0% 10Y total return vs BWMN's 121.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.60, Low D/E 75.9%, current ratio 1.26x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPRIM logoPRIM19.0% revenue growth vs BWMN's 14.9%
ValueBWMN logoBWMNLower P/E (17.9x vs 20.4x), PEG 0.35 vs 1.11
Quality / MarginsPRIM logoPRIM3.3% margin vs BWMN's 2.8%
Stability / SafetyPRIM logoPRIMBeta 1.60 vs BWMN's 1.81
DividendsPRIM logoPRIM0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRIM logoPRIM+34.3% vs BWMN's +12.4%
Efficiency (ROA)PRIM logoPRIM5.6% ROA vs BWMN's 1.9%, ROIC 13.6% vs 3.6%

BWMN vs PRIM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BWMNBowman Consulting Group Ltd.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$490M
PRIMPrimoris Services Corporation
FY 2025
Energy
65.1%$5.0B
U And D Segment
34.9%$2.7B

BWMN vs PRIM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPRIMLAGGINGBWMN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

PRIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 19.9x BWMN's $377M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.3% (PRIM) to 2.8% (BWMN). On growth, PRIM holds the edge at -5.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBWMN logoBWMNBowman Consulting…PRIM logoPRIMPrimoris Services…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$377M$7.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$47M$437M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$11M$248M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$32M$165M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+46.6%+10.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.8%+4.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.8%+3.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.5%+2.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%-5.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%-60.5%
PRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 19.7x trailing earnings, PRIM trades at a 54% valuation discount to BWMN's 42.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWMN offers better value at 0.84x vs PRIM's 1.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBWMN logoBWMNBowman Consulting…PRIM logoPRIMPrimoris Services…
Market CapShares × price$532M$5.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$668M$6.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS42.56x19.65x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.88x20.35x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.84x1.07x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.37x12.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.09x0.71x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.99x3.22x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.91x15.71x
PRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

PRIM delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $4 for BWMN. BWMN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRIM's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BWMN scores 6/9 vs PRIM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBWMN logoBWMNBowman Consulting…PRIM logoPRIMPrimoris Services…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.1%+15.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.9%+5.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.6%+13.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.1%+16.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.56x0.76x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$136M$735M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11M$541M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$147M$1.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.38x21.02x
PRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PRIM five years ago would be worth $31,646 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,846 for BWMN. Over the past 12 months, PRIM leads with a +34.3% total return vs BWMN's +12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRIM at 49.9% vs BWMN's 1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBWMN logoBWMNBowman Consulting…PRIM logoPRIMPrimoris Services…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-8.3%-24.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+12.4%+34.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4.2%+237.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+128.5%+216.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+121.9%+415.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.4%+49.9%
PRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BWMN and PRIM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PRIM is the less volatile stock with a 1.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BWMN's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWMN currently trades 67.8% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 48.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBWMN logoBWMNBowman Consulting…PRIM logoPRIMPrimoris Services…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.81x1.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$45.83$205.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.00$71.97
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.8%+48.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.232.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded105K1.8M
Evenly matched — BWMN and PRIM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates BWMN as "Buy" and PRIM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 86.7% upside for BWMN (target: $58) vs 55.3% for PRIM (target: $153). PRIM is the only dividend payer here at 0.32% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBWMN logoBWMNBowman Consulting…PRIM logoPRIMPrimoris Services…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$58.00$153.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts724
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.32
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.5%+0.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

PRIM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallPrimoris Services Corporati… (PRIM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BWMN vs PRIM: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BWMN or PRIM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the stronger pick with 19.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 9% for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BWMN or PRIM?

On trailing P/E, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the cheapest at 19.

7x versus Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. at 42. 6x. On forward P/E, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. is actually cheaper at 17. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. wins at 0. 35x versus Primoris Services Corporation's 1. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BWMN or PRIM?

Over the past 5 years, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) delivered a total return of +216.

5%, compared to +128. 5% for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRIM returned +415. 0% versus BWMN's +121. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BWMN or PRIM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

60β versus Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. 's 1. 81β — meaning BWMN is approximately 13% more volatile than PRIM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 76% for Primoris Services Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BWMN or PRIM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is pulling ahead at 19.

0% versus 14. 9% for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. grew EPS 329. 4% year-over-year, compared to 51. 7% for Primoris Services Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BWMN leads at 23. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BWMN or PRIM?

Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more profitable company, earning 3.

6% net margin versus 2. 5% for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRIM leads at 5. 5% versus 3. 9% for BWMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BWMN leads at 47. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BWMN or PRIM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Primoris Services Corporation's 1. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) trades at 17. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Primoris Services Corporation — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BWMN: 86. 7% to $58. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BWMN or PRIM?

In this comparison, PRIM (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. BWMN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BWMN or PRIM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+415.

0% 10Y return). Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRIM: +415. 0%, BWMN: +121. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BWMN and PRIM?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BWMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.