Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (BWMX) vs Rh (RH) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BWMX | 8.4% revenue growth vs RH's 5.0% |
| Value | BWMX | Lower P/E (6.7x vs 23.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | BWMX | 7.2% net margin vs RH's 3.2% |
| Stability / Safety | BWMX | Beta 0.47 vs RH's 2.73 |
| Dividends | BWMX | 9.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; RH pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BWMX | +56.3% vs RH's -48.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BWMX | 10.2% ROA vs RH's 2.3%, ROIC 20.3% vs 6.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Betterware de México is a direct-to-consumer company that sells home organization and household products through catalog-based sales in Mexico. It generates revenue primarily from product sales through its network of independent distributors who use physical catalogs to take orders from customers. The company's competitive advantage lies in its established catalog-based distribution model and strong brand recognition in the Mexican home organization market.
RH is a luxury home furnishings retailer offering high-end furniture, lighting, textiles, and decor through its distinctive galleries and online channels. It generates revenue primarily through direct retail sales of its premium home products — with a growing hospitality segment — while maintaining high margins through its curated brand experience. The company's moat lies in its aspirational brand positioning, architectural gallery destinations that create immersive experiences, and its integrated ecosystem of products, spaces, and services.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
BWMX leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
BWMX is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.2B annually — 4.2x RH's $3.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.2% (BWMX) to 3.2% (RH). On growth, RH holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BWMXBetterware de Méx… | RHRh |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.2B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.5B | $465M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | $110M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $128M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.2% | +44.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.4% | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | +10.2% |
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, BWMX trades at a 67% valuation discount to RH's 45.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BWMX's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RH's 15.5x.
| Metric | BWMXBetterware de Méx… | RHRh |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $618M | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $901M | $7.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.97x | 45.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.71x | 23.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.47x | 15.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 0.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.17x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.65x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RH delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $79 for BWMX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BWMX scores 6/9 vs RH's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BWMXBetterware de Méx… | RHRh |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +79.4% | +32.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.2% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.3% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.1% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.45x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.9B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $297M | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.65x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in BWMX five years ago would be worth $5,296 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,275 for RH. Over the past 12 months, BWMX leads with a +56.3% total return vs RH's -48.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BWMX at 26.0% vs RH's -17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BWMXBetterware de Méx… | RHRh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.7% | -14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.3% | -48.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.0% | -44.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.0% | -67.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.5% | +336.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.0% | -17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BWMX is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RH's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWMX currently trades 83.7% from its 52-week high vs RH's 49.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BWMXBetterware de Méx… | RHRh |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 2.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.79 | $331.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.00 | $123.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.7% | +49.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 42.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 94K | 794K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BWMX as "Buy" and RH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.3% upside for RH (target: $213) vs 20.7% for BWMX (target: $20). BWMX is the only dividend payer here at 9.37% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | BWMXBetterware de Méx… | RHRh |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $212.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $26.74 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betterware de Méxic… (BWMX) | 100 | 201.51 | +101.5% |
| Rh (RH) | 100 | 101.44 | +1.4% |
Betterware de Méxic… (BWMX) returned -47% over 5 years vs Rh (RH)'s -67%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betterware de Méxic… (BWMX) | $1.4B | $14.1B | +872.7% |
| Rh (RH) | $2.1B | $3.2B | +50.8% |
Rh's revenue grew from $2.1B (2015) to $3.2B (2024) — a 4.7% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betterware de Méxic… (BWMX) | 14.3% | 5.0% | -64.8% |
| Rh (RH) | 4.3% | 2.3% | -47.3% |
Rh's net margin went from 4% (2015) to 2% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 7 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betterware de Méxic… (BWMX) | 0.7 | 0.6 | -14.3% |
| Rh (RH) | 21.1 | 108.7 | +415.2% |
Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. has traded in a 0x–4x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~15x. Rh has traded in a 13x–109x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~46x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betterware de Méxic… (BWMX) | 25.11 | 19.07 | -24.1% |
| Rh (RH) | 2.16 | 3.62 | +67.6% |
Rh's EPS grew from $2.16 (2015) to $3.62 (2024) — a 6% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. generated $2B FCF in 2024 (+51% vs 2021). Rh generated $-214M FCF in 2024 (-145% vs 2021).
BWMX vs RH: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWMX or RH a better buy right now?
Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (BWMX) offers the better valuation at 15.0x trailing P/E (6.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (BWMX) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWMX or RH?
On trailing P/E, Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (BWMX) is the cheapest at 15.0x versus Rh at 45.8x. On forward P/E, Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. is actually cheaper at 6.7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWMX or RH?
Over the past 5 years, Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (BWMX) delivered a total return of -47.0%, compared to -67.2% for Rh (RH). A $10,000 investment in BWMX five years ago would be worth approximately $5K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RH returned +336.2% versus BWMX's +146.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWMX or RH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (BWMX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.47β versus Rh's 2.73β — meaning RH is approximately 476% more volatile than BWMX relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — BWMX or RH?
Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (BWMX) is the more profitable company, earning 5.0% net margin versus 2.3% for Rh — meaning it keeps 5.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWMX leads at 12.0% versus 10.1% for RH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BWMX leads at 67.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BWMX or RH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (BWMX) trades at 6.7x forward P/E versus 23.8x for Rh — 17.1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RH: 28.3% to $212.67.
07Which pays a better dividend — BWMX or RH?
In this comparison, BWMX (9.4% yield) pays a dividend. RH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BWMX or RH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (BWMX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.47), 9.4% yield, +146.5% 10Y return). Rh (RH) carries a higher beta of 2.73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BWMX: +146.5%, RH: +336.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BWMX and RH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: BWMX is a small-cap deep-value stock; RH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BWMX pays a dividend while RH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.