Consumer Electronics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BWNB vs AMSC vs GE vs GNRC vs HUBB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Aerospace & Defense
Industrial - Machinery
Electrical Equipment & Parts
BWNB vs AMSC vs GE vs GNRC vs HUBB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Industrial - Machinery | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial - Machinery | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $2.38B | $2.56B | $316.20B | $15.65B | $26.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $635M | $279M | $48.35B | $4.33B | $6.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-36M | $130M | $8.66B | $189M | $906M |
| Gross Margin | 25.5% | 30.6% | 34.8% | 38.1% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 4.9% | 18.5% | 7.5% | 20.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.4x | 40.0x | 30.9x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $369M | $3M | $20.49B | $1.33B | $2.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $90M | $79M | $12.39B | $341M | $483M |
BWNB vs AMSC vs GE vs GNRC vs HUBB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Babcock & Wilcox En… (BWNB) | 100 | 100.8 | +0.8% |
| American Supercondu… (AMSC) | 100 | 489.2 | +389.2% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 514.8 | +414.8% |
| Generac Holdings In… (GNRC) | 100 | 75.8 | -24.2% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 236.7 | +136.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWNB vs AMSC vs GE vs GNRC vs HUBB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWNB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +171.7% vs HUBB's +41.5%
AMSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 143.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs BWNB's -18.1%
- 46.7% margin vs BWNB's -5.7%
- 18.1% ROA vs BWNB's -5.3%, ROIC -0.9% vs 9.1%
GE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 1.14 vs AMSC's 2.90
Among these 5 stocks, GNRC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HUBB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 1.1%
- 410.7% 10Y total return vs AMSC's 379.0%
- PEG 1.20 vs GE's 3.39
- Beta 1.38, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.72x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs BWNB's -18.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.0x vs 30.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.7% margin vs BWNB's -5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs AMSC's 2.90 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs GE's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +171.7% vs HUBB's +41.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.1% ROA vs BWNB's -5.3%, ROIC -0.9% vs 9.1% |
BWNB vs AMSC vs GE vs GNRC vs HUBB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BWNB vs AMSC vs GE vs GNRC vs HUBB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMSC leads in 2 of 6 categories
HUBB leads 2 • BWNB leads 0 • GE leads 0 • GNRC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMSC leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GE is the larger business by revenue, generating $48.4B annually — 173.1x AMSC's $279M. AMSC is the more profitable business, keeping 46.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWNB's -5.7%. On growth, BWNB holds the edge at +142.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $635M | $279M | $48.4B | $4.3B | $6.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $43M | $18M | $9.9B | $472M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$36M | $130M | $8.7B | $189M | $906M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$86M | $16M | $7.5B | $419M | $909M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +30.6% | +34.8% | +38.1% | +35.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +4.9% | +18.5% | +7.5% | +20.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +46.7% | +17.9% | +4.4% | +15.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | +5.7% | +15.4% | +9.7% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +142.9% | +21.4% | +24.7% | +12.4% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.4% | +39.9% | -1.1% | +69.9% | +8.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HUBB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.8x trailing earnings, HUBB trades at a 91% valuation discount to AMSC's 332.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HUBB offers better value at 1.43x vs GE's 3.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $2.6B | $316.2B | $15.7B | $26.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $2.5B | $324.3B | $16.6B | $28.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -52.08x | 332.63x | 37.09x | 99.17x | 29.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.37x | 40.02x | 30.91x | 25.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.14x | — | 1.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 80.53x | 454.16x | 32.46x | 34.39x | 20.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.05x | 11.47x | 6.90x | 3.72x | 4.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.18x | 17.09x | 5.99x | 6.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 98.78x | 43.53x | 58.38x | 29.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GE delivers a 45.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $7 for GNRC. AMSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GE's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSC scores 7/9 vs BWNB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +24.3% | +45.8% | +7.2% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | +18.1% | +6.8% | +3.4% | +11.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | -0.9% | +24.7% | +5.9% | +17.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | -0.6% | +9.6% | +6.9% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x | 1.08x | 0.51x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $279M | -$76M | $8.1B | $992M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $90M | $79M | $12.4B | $341M | $483M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $369M | $3M | $20.5B | $1.3B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.97x | — | 11.69x | 4.54x | 16.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AMSC and GNRC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GE five years ago would be worth $46,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,149 for GNRC. Over the past 12 months, BWNB leads with a +171.7% total return vs HUBB's +41.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMSC at 139.0% vs BWNB's 13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.0% | +68.5% | -5.5% | +89.1% | +6.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +171.7% | +156.9% | +44.9% | +129.9% | +41.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.0% | +1264.6% | +280.0% | +141.5% | +87.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.2% | +255.0% | +362.5% | -18.5% | +159.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.2% | +379.0% | +121.0% | +666.1% | +410.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.2% | +139.0% | +56.0% | +34.2% | +23.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GE and GNRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GE is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMSC's 2.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs AMSC's 75.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 2.90x | 1.14x | 1.69x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.40 | $70.49 | $348.48 | $269.58 | $565.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.15 | $20.43 | $208.22 | $113.96 | $349.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.4% | +75.5% | +86.8% | +99.0% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.3 | 74.0 | 56.4 | 77.8 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 1.1M | 5.7M | 895K | 546K |
Analyst Outlook
HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMSC as "Buy", GE as "Buy", GNRC as "Buy", HUBB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.6% upside for GE (target: $386) vs 1.7% for GNRC (target: $271). For income investors, HUBB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs GE's 0.45%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $61.50 | $386.20 | $271.22 | $535.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 34 | 39 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | — | +0.4% | +0.0% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | — | $1.36 | $0.00 | $5.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.0% | +2.4% | +0.9% | +0.9% |
AMSC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HUBB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
BWNB vs AMSC vs GE vs GNRC vs HUBB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWNB or AMSC or GE or GNRC or HUBB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWNB). Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) offers the better valuation at 29. 8x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWNB or AMSC or GE or GNRC or HUBB?
On trailing P/E, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the cheapest at 29.
8x versus American Superconductor Corporation at 332. 6x. On forward P/E, American Superconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hubbell Incorporated wins at 1. 20x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 39x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWNB or AMSC or GE or GNRC or HUBB?
Over the past 5 years, GE Aerospace (GE) delivered a total return of +362.
5%, compared to -18. 5% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNRC returned +666. 1% versus BWNB's +29. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWNB or AMSC or GE or GNRC or HUBB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GE Aerospace (GE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
14β versus American Superconductor Corporation's 2. 90β — meaning AMSC is approximately 154% more volatile than GE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 108% for GE Aerospace — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWNB or AMSC or GE or GNRC or HUBB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus -18. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWNB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Superconductor Corporation grew EPS 143. 2% year-over-year, compared to -50. 1% for Generac Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMSC leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWNB or AMSC or GE or GNRC or HUBB?
GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
0% net margin versus -6. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus -0. 5% for AMSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BWNB or AMSC or GE or GNRC or HUBB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 20x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 39x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) trades at 15. 4x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for GE Aerospace — 24. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GE: 27. 6% to $386. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — BWNB or AMSC or GE or GNRC or HUBB?
In this comparison, HUBB (1.
1% yield), BWNB (0. 6% yield), GE (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. AMSC, GNRC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BWNB or AMSC or GE or GNRC or HUBB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
1% yield, +410. 7% 10Y return). American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBB: +410. 7%, AMSC: +379. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BWNB and AMSC and GE and GNRC and HUBB?
These companies operate in different sectors (BWNB (Technology) and AMSC (Industrials) and GE (Industrials) and GNRC (Industrials) and HUBB (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BWNB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock; GNRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HUBB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BWNB, HUBB pay a dividend while AMSC, GE, GNRC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.