Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BY vs FBIZ vs TCBK vs MBWM vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
BY vs FBIZ vs TCBK vs MBWM vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.52B | $473M | $1.63B | $898M | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $629M | $279M | $533M | $372M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $130M | $51M | $122M | $89M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 66.1% | 57.3% | 75.9% | 64.0% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 29.1% | 21.6% | 31.7% | 27.5% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 9.1x | 12.0x | 9.5x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $565M | $259M | $80M | $826M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $31M | $157M | $473M | $599M |
BY vs FBIZ vs TCBK vs MBWM vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY) | 100 | 274.7 | +174.7% |
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 342.7 | +242.7% |
| TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) | 100 | 179.1 | +79.1% |
| Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM) | 100 | 226.7 | +126.7% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BY vs FBIZ vs TCBK vs MBWM vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BY is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 4.0% vs MBWM's 2.9%
FBIZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 16.5%
- 6.4% NII/revenue growth vs BY's 1.3%
TCBK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +33.5% vs FIS's -35.3%
MBWM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 178.2% 10Y total return vs FBIZ's 161.7%
- 23.9% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 1.4% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 5.5% vs 6.0%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.31 vs TCBK's 1.05
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% NII/revenue growth vs BY's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 12.0x), PEG 0.31 vs 1.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.9% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs TCBK's 0.93 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FBIZ's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.5% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 5.5% vs 6.0% |
BY vs FBIZ vs TCBK vs MBWM vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BY vs FBIZ vs TCBK vs MBWM vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FBIZ leads in 2 of 6 categories
TCBK leads 1 • BY leads 0 • MBWM leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TCBK and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 39.0x FBIZ's $279M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $629M | $279M | $533M | $372M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $188M | $49M | $183M | $107M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $130M | $51M | $122M | $89M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $136M | $53M | $124M | $11M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.1% | +57.3% | +75.9% | +64.0% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +21.6% | +31.7% | +27.5% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +18.0% | +22.8% | +23.9% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +21.9% | +24.0% | +3.0% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | +12.9% | +17.0% | +14.8% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FBIZ leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FBIZ trades at a 85% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBIZ offers better value at 0.37x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $473M | $1.6B | $898M | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $702M | $1.6B | $1.3B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.55x | 9.36x | 13.70x | 9.53x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.34x | 9.15x | 12.05x | 9.54x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.47x | 0.37x | 1.20x | 0.63x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.76x | 11.61x | 8.52x | 11.75x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.41x | 1.69x | 3.06x | 2.42x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 1.25x | 1.25x | 1.17x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.12x | 7.74x | 12.77x | 80.15x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TCBK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIZ delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. TCBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBWM's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIZ scores 8/9 vs MBWM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +14.1% | +9.4% | +13.5% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +1.2% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +7.0% | +8.9% | +5.5% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +2.6% | +10.8% | +8.0% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.70x | 0.06x | 1.14x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $505M | $229M | -$77M | $353M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $31M | $157M | $473M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $565M | $259M | $80M | $826M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.98x | 0.42x | 1.41x | 0.79x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBIZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $23,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, TCBK leads with a +33.5% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBIZ at 33.2% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.8% | +7.1% | +8.5% | +10.1% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.3% | +21.0% | +33.5% | +23.6% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.9% | +136.5% | +78.3% | +127.3% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.1% | +130.9% | +21.6% | +78.4% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.3% | +161.7% | +129.4% | +178.2% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.5% | +33.2% | +21.3% | +31.5% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BY and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TCBK's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BY currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 0.81x | 0.93x | 0.87x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.33 | $60.54 | $53.18 | $55.77 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.75 | $45.90 | $36.32 | $42.17 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +93.7% | +95.6% | +93.3% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 49.1 | 57.2 | 53.1 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 195K | 39K | 142K | 112K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBIZ and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BY as "Hold", FBIZ as "Buy", TCBK as "Buy", MBWM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 9.6% for MBWM (target: $57). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs BY's 1.20%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $67.00 | $57.33 | $57.00 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 10 | 12 | 7 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +2.1% | +2.7% | +2.8% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $1.19 | $1.38 | $1.47 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.3% | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FBIZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). TCBK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
BY vs FBIZ vs TCBK vs MBWM vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BY or FBIZ or TCBK or MBWM or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY). First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BY or FBIZ or TCBK or MBWM or FIS?
On trailing P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus TriCo Bancshares's 1. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BY or FBIZ or TCBK or MBWM or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +130. 9%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MBWM returned +178. 2% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BY or FBIZ or TCBK or MBWM or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus TriCo Bancshares's 0. 93β — meaning TCBK is approximately 22% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 114% for Mercantile Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BY or FBIZ or TCBK or MBWM or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus 1. 3% for Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Business Financial Services, Inc. grew EPS 16. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BY or FBIZ or TCBK or MBWM or FIS?
Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
9% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TCBK leads at 31. 7% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TCBK leads at 75. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BY or FBIZ or TCBK or MBWM or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus TriCo Bancshares's 1. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for TriCo Bancshares — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — BY or FBIZ or TCBK or MBWM or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 2% for Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY).
09Is BY or FBIZ or TCBK or MBWM or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 2. 1% yield, +161. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBIZ: +161. 7%, TCBK: +129. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BY and FBIZ and TCBK and MBWM and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (BY (Financial Services) and FBIZ (Financial Services) and TCBK (Financial Services) and MBWM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BY is a small-cap deep-value stock; FBIZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; TCBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.