Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs PSFE vs NHIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Information Technology Services
Shell Companies
BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs PSFE vs NHIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Software - Application | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Information Technology Services | Shell Companies |
| Market Cap | $43M | $16K | $505M | $367M | $302M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $12M | $335M | $1.74B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-740K | $-156M | $107M | $-199M | $5M |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | 15.2% | 63.8% | 48.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | -7.2% | 42.6% | 5.5% | — |
| Forward P/E | 79.1x | 0.0x | 10.9x | 3.3x | 54.6x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $2M | $152M | $2.66B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $273K | $6M | $199M | $1.35B | $1M |
BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs PSFE vs NHIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| byNordic Acquisitio… (BYNO) | 100 | 109.1 | +9.1% |
| Next Technology Hol… (NXTT) | 100 | 2.5 | -97.5% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 91.4 | -8.6% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
| NewHold Investment … (NHIC) | 100 | 113.1 | +13.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs PSFE vs NHIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BYNO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 27.8% 10Y total return vs ACIC's -24.1%
NXTT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth 7.3%
- 5.5% revenue growth vs BYNO's -79.9%
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 10.9x)
ACIC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.22x
- 31.9% margin vs NXTT's -12.9%
- 9.0% ROA vs NXTT's -26.2%, ROIC 41.0% vs -22.5%
Among these 5 stocks, PSFE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NHIC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.07
- Beta 0.07, current ratio 1.07x
- Beta 0.07 vs PSFE's 2.44
- +7.4% vs NXTT's -99.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs BYNO's -79.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.9% margin vs NXTT's -12.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs PSFE's 2.44 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.4% vs NXTT's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs NXTT's -26.2%, ROIC 41.0% vs -22.5% |
BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs PSFE vs NHIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs PSFE vs NHIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACIC leads in 3 of 6 categories
PSFE leads 1 • BYNO leads 0 • NXTT leads 0 • NHIC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE and NHIC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACIC is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXTT's -12.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $12M | $335M | $1.7B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$86M | $154M | $373M | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$739,762 | -$156M | $107M | -$199M | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $145M | $71M | $174M | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | +15.2% | +63.8% | +48.4% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | -7.2% | +42.6% | +5.5% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -54.7% | -12.9% | +31.9% | -11.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +12.0% | +21.1% | +10.0% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +9.3% | +10.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.2% | -3.1% | +4.3% | -115.2% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, NXTT trades at a 100% valuation discount to BYNO's 79.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACIC's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PSFE's 4.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $16,069 | $505M | $367M | $302M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | -$4M | $459M | $1.7B | $300M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 79.06x | 0.00x | 4.86x | -2.26x | 54.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 10.94x | 3.27x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.00x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 2.81x | 4.24x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.00x | 1.51x | 0.22x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.00x | 1.64x | 0.63x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 7.13x | 1.64x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NXTT. NXTT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NXTT scores 6/9 vs BYNO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.0% | -30.0% | +35.7% | -28.6% | +2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | -26.2% | +9.0% | -4.2% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -22.5% | +41.0% | +3.6% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -26.3% | +26.0% | +3.6% | -1.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x | 0.48x | 4.06x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$4M | -$46M | $1.3B | -$1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $272,588 | $6M | $199M | $1.3B | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $2M | $152M | $2.7B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 14.20x | 0.75x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACIC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACIC five years ago would be worth $19,866 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for NXTT. Over the past 12 months, NHIC leads with a +7.4% total return vs NXTT's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACIC at 33.5% vs NXTT's -89.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | -73.5% | -1.6% | -11.0% | +5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.0% | -99.3% | +5.2% | -45.0% | +7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | -99.9% | +137.8% | -33.0% | +10.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -100.0% | +98.7% | -94.9% | +10.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -100.0% | -24.1% | -94.1% | +10.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | -89.5% | +33.5% | -12.5% | +3.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BYNO and NHIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NHIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYNO currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs NXTT's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 1.74x | 0.10x | 2.44x | 0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.75 | $738.00 | $13.06 | $15.02 | $11.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.01 | $0.45 | $9.79 | $5.95 | $10.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +0.2% | +80.0% | +47.3% | +94.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 51.3 | 44.8 | 39.7 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 414 | 145K | 238K | 324K | 177K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACIC as "Hold", PSFE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.7% upside for PSFE (target: $10) vs -81.8% for ACIC (target: $2).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $1.90 | $10.13 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 5 | 11 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +69.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +27.6% | 0.0% |
ACIC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs PSFE vs NHIC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or PSFE or NHIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the stronger pick with 545. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or PSFE or NHIC?
On trailing P/E, Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus byNordic Acquisition Corporation at 79. 1x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 3. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or PSFE or NHIC?
Over the past 5 years, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) delivered a total return of +98.
7%, compared to -100. 0% for Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BYNO returned +27. 8% versus NXTT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or PSFE or NHIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
07β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 44β — meaning PSFE is approximately 3206% more volatile than NHIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or PSFE or NHIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is pulling ahead at 545. 3% versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Next Technology Holding Inc. grew EPS 728. 0% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACIC leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or PSFE or NHIC?
Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the more profitable company, earning 1233% net margin versus -54. 7% for byNordic Acquisition Corporation — meaning it keeps 1233% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACIC leads at 42. 6% versus -690. 5% for NXTT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or PSFE or NHIC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 3.
3x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for American Coastal Insurance Corporation — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PSFE: 42. 7% to $10. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or PSFE or NHIC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or PSFE or NHIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
07)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 44 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NHIC: +10. 0%, PSFE: -94. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BYNO and NXTT and ACIC and PSFE and NHIC?
These companies operate in different sectors (BYNO (Financial Services) and NXTT (Technology) and ACIC (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology) and NHIC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BYNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXTT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NHIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.