Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BZFD vs GCI vs NYT vs IAC vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Publishing
Publishing
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
BZFD vs GCI vs NYT vs IAC vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Publishing | Publishing | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $31M | $877M | $12.85B | $3.28B | $4.85T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $185M | $2.34B | $2.90B | $2.25B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-58M | $96M | $382M | $41M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 40.5% | 36.4% | 52.1% | 64.6% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -25.8% | 2.0% | 16.1% | 1.5% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 51.0x | 27.9x | — | 28.9x |
| Total Debt | $86M | $1.29B | $49M | $1.43B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $106M | $255M | $960M | $30.71B |
BZFD vs GCI vs NYT vs IAC vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| Gannett Co., Inc. (GCI) | 100 | 95.7 | -4.3% |
| The New York Times … (NYT) | 100 | 156.9 | +56.9% |
| IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC) | 100 | 37.3 | -62.7% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 388.6 | +288.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BZFD vs GCI vs NYT vs IAC vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BZFD plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
GCI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NYT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 1.54x
- Beta 0.34, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.54x
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, IAC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs NYT's 5.7%
- PEG 0.97 vs NYT's 0.98
- 15.1% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs BZFD's -31.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs BZFD's 2.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.3% vs BZFD's -54.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs BZFD's -28.4%, ROIC 25.1% vs -27.8% |
BZFD vs GCI vs NYT vs IAC vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BZFD vs GCI vs NYT vs IAC vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories
NYT leads 2 • BZFD leads 0 • GCI leads 0 • IAC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 2280.9x BZFD's $185M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BZFD's -31.2%. On growth, BZFD holds the edge at +66.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $185M | $2.3B | $2.9B | $2.2B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | $214M | $557M | $129M | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$58M | $96M | $382M | $41M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $28M | $542M | $60M | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.5% | +36.4% | +52.1% | +64.6% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -25.8% | +2.0% | +16.1% | +1.5% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.2% | +4.1% | +13.2% | +1.8% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +1.2% | +18.7% | +2.7% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.9% | -8.4% | +12.0% | -25.9% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.2% | -92.9% | +80.0% | +64.8% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BZFD and IAC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.1x trailing earnings, GOOGL trades at a 2% valuation discount to NYT's 38.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.24x vs NYT's 1.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31M | $877M | $12.9B | $3.3B | $4.85T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $108M | $2.1B | $12.6B | $3.7B | $4.88T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.54x | -33.11x | 38.00x | -33.13x | 37.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 51.03x | 27.91x | — | 28.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.34x | — | 1.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.14x | 23.17x | 14.57x | 32.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 0.35x | 4.55x | 1.37x | 12.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 5.56x | 6.42x | 0.71x | 11.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.27x | 23.35x | 73.10x | 66.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NYT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GCI delivers a 49.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $50 in annual profit, vs $-75 for BZFD. NYT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GCI's 8.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NYT scores 9/9 vs BZFD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -75.2% | +49.7% | +19.2% | +0.9% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.4% | +5.0% | +13.2% | +0.6% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.8% | -2.3% | +18.7% | -1.2% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.0% | -2.7% | +19.8% | -1.3% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.71x | 8.43x | 0.02x | 0.30x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $77M | $1.2B | -$207M | $466M | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $106M | $255M | $960M | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $86M | $1.3B | $49M | $1.4B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.78x | 0.91x | 397.81x | 4.84x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $35,112 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $210 for BZFD. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +160.3% total return vs BZFD's -54.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 55.1% vs BZFD's -29.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.6% | +14.4% | +14.3% | +12.9% | +27.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.8% | +69.3% | +52.4% | +19.8% | +160.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.2% | +202.5% | +103.5% | -0.8% | +273.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +38.0% | +83.0% | -65.6% | +251.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -28.9% | +569.7% | +357.5% | +1003.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.0% | +44.6% | +26.7% | -0.3% | +55.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NYT and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NYT is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BZFD's 2.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs BZFD's 30.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.50x | 0.70x | 0.34x | 1.04x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.68 | $6.17 | $87.10 | $45.78 | $402.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.54 | $3.15 | $51.03 | $29.56 | $152.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.7% | +96.7% | +91.2% | +96.2% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.0 | 71.1 | 49.9 | 52.7 | 83.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 233K | 1.5M | 2.1M | 1.1M | 28.0M |
Analyst Outlook
NYT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GCI as "Hold", NYT as "Hold", IAC as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for IAC (target: $51) vs -6.9% for GCI (target: $6). For income investors, NYT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.84% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.55 | $81.20 | $51.33 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 16 | 33 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 7 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.67 | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +1.3% | +9.6% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NYT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
BZFD vs GCI vs NYT vs IAC vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BZFD or GCI or NYT or IAC or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) offers the better valuation at 37. 1x trailing P/E (28. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BZFD or GCI or NYT or IAC or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the cheapest at 37. 1x versus The New York Times Company at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, The New York Times Company is actually cheaper at 27. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 97x versus The New York Times Company's 0. 98x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BZFD or GCI or NYT or IAC or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +251. 1%, compared to -97. 9% for BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +1004% versus BZFD's -97. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BZFD or GCI or NYT or IAC or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The New York Times Company (NYT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
34β versus BuzzFeed, Inc. 's 2. 50β — meaning BZFD is approximately 628% more volatile than NYT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The New York Times Company (NYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 8% for Gannett Co. , Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BZFD or GCI or NYT or IAC or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IAC InterActive Corp. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to -68. 1% for BuzzFeed, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOGL leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BZFD or GCI or NYT or IAC or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -31. 2% for BuzzFeed, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -25. 8% for BZFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IAC leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BZFD or GCI or NYT or IAC or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus The New York Times Company's 0. 98x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The New York Times Company (NYT) trades at 27. 9x forward P/E versus 51. 0x for Gannett Co. , Inc. — 23. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IAC: 16. 5% to $51. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — BZFD or GCI or NYT or IAC or GOOGL?
In this comparison, NYT (0.
8% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BZFD, GCI, IAC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BZFD or GCI or NYT or IAC or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The New York Times Company (NYT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
34), 0. 8% yield, +569. 7% 10Y return). BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD) carries a higher beta of 2. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NYT: +569. 7%, BZFD: -97. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BZFD and GCI and NYT and IAC and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (BZFD (Communication Services) and GCI (Communication Services) and NYT (Communication Services) and IAC (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BZFD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NYT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. NYT pays a dividend while BZFD, GCI, IAC, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 33%
- Gross Margin > 24%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.