Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BZFD vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BZFD
BuzzFeed, Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$30M
5Y Perf.-97.9%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$374.00B
5Y Perf.+69.2%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.81T
5Y Perf.+285.9%
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$317M
5Y Perf.-95.9%

BZFD vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BZFD logoBZFD
NFLX logoNFLX
GOOGL logoGOOGL
FUBO logoFUBO
IndustryInternet Content & InformationEntertainmentInternet Content & InformationBroadcasting
Market Cap$30M$374.00B$4.81T$317M
Revenue (TTM)$185M$45.18B$422.57B$2.72B
Net Income (TTM)$-58M$10.98B$160.21B$156M
Gross Margin40.5%48.5%60.4%11.1%
Operating Margin-25.8%29.5%32.7%-2.6%
Forward P/E24.8x29.6x
Total Debt$86M$14.46B$59.29B$670M
Cash & Equiv.$8M$9.03B$30.71B$452M

BZFD vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BZFD
NFLX
GOOGL
FUBO
StockMar 21May 26Return
BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD)1002.1-97.9%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100169.2+69.2%
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)100385.9+285.9%
fuboTV Inc. (FUBO)1004.1-95.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BZFD vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GOOGL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Netflix, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. FUBO also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BZFD
BuzzFeed, Inc.
The Secondary Option

BZFD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Income Pick

NFLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • beta 0.39
  • PEG 0.75 vs GOOGL's 0.99
  • Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 10.0% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
  • 37.9% margin vs BZFD's -31.2%
  • 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.
The Growth Play

FUBO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 67.7%, EPS growth 96.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.2%
  • 67.7% revenue growth vs BZFD's -2.4%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFUBO logoFUBO67.7% revenue growth vs BZFD's -2.4%
ValueNFLX logoNFLXBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsGOOGL logoGOOGL37.9% margin vs BZFD's -31.2%
Stability / SafetyNFLX logoNFLXBeta 0.39 vs BZFD's 2.48, lower leverage
DividendsGOOGL logoGOOGL0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GOOGL logoGOOGL+163.5% vs FUBO's -65.6%
Efficiency (ROA)GOOGL logoGOOGL27.4% ROA vs BZFD's -28.4%, ROIC 25.1% vs -27.8%

BZFD vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BZFDBuzzFeed, Inc.
FY 2024
Advertising
49.7%$94M
Commerce and other
32.5%$62M
Content
17.8%$34M
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.
FY 2025
Google Search & Other
55.7%$224.5B
Google Cloud
14.6%$58.7B
Google Inc.
11.9%$48.0B
YouTube Advertising Revenue
10.0%$40.4B
Google Network
7.4%$29.8B
Other Bets
0.4%$1.5B
Other Segments
-0.0%$-127,000,000
FUBOfuboTV Inc.
FY 2024
Subscription and Circulation
92.4%$1.5B
Advertising
7.1%$115M
Service, Other
0.5%$7M

BZFD vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGOOGLLAGGINGFUBO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 2280.9x BZFD's $185M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BZFD's -31.2%. On growth, FUBO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBZFD logoBZFDBuzzFeed, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$185M$45.2B$422.6B$2.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$32M$30.1B$161.3B-$14M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$58M$11.0B$160.2B$156M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$12M$9.5B$73.3B-$81M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+40.5%+48.5%+60.4%+11.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-25.8%+29.5%+32.7%-2.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-31.2%+24.3%+37.9%+5.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-6.2%+20.9%+17.3%-3.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+66.9%+17.6%+21.8%+2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.2%+31.1%+81.9%+81.8%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 34.9x trailing earnings, NFLX trades at a 5% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs GOOGL's 1.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBZFD logoBZFDBuzzFeed, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.
Market CapShares × price$30M$374.0B$4.81T$317M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$108M$379.4B$4.84T$534M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.53x34.89x36.82x-44.88x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.80x29.61x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.06x1.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.61x32.22x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.16x8.28x11.95x0.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.62x14.32x11.72x0.12x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF39.53x65.72x
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-75 for BZFD. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BZFD's 1.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs BZFD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBZFD logoBZFDBuzzFeed, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-75.2%+41.3%+39.0%+16.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-28.4%+19.8%+27.4%+8.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-27.8%+29.8%+25.1%-3.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-44.0%+30.5%+30.3%-4.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92774
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.71x0.54x0.14x0.25x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$77M$5.4B$28.6B$218M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$9.0B$30.7B$452M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$86M$14.5B$59.3B$670M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-10.78x17.33x392.15x10.35x
Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $208 for BZFD. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs FUBO's -65.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs BZFD's -29.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBZFD logoBZFDBuzzFeed, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-15.4%-3.0%+26.4%-65.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-56.6%-23.6%+163.5%-65.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-64.5%+166.5%+270.8%-51.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.9%+75.2%+239.8%-94.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.9%+875.3%+996.1%-90.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-29.2%+38.6%+54.8%-21.6%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BZFD's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FUBO's 19.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBZFD logoBZFDBuzzFeed, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.48x0.39x1.26x1.77x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.68$134.12$400.10$56.64
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.54$75.01$147.84$2.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+30.4%+65.8%+99.5%+19.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.635.383.438.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded232K44.0M28.3M1.9M
Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", FUBO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 299.3% upside for FUBO (target: $43) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBZFD logoBZFDBuzzFeed, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$116.29$406.28$43.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts998214
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.4%+0.9%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NFLX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallAlphabet Inc. (GOOGL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BZFD vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BZFD or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 4% for BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BZFD or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO?

On trailing P/E, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BZFD or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO?

Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -97. 9% for BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus BZFD's -97. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BZFD or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus BuzzFeed, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning BZFD is approximately 538% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 171% for BuzzFeed, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BZFD or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus -2. 4% for BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: fuboTV Inc. grew EPS 96. 3% year-over-year, compared to -68. 1% for BuzzFeed, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUBO leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BZFD or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO?

Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -31. 2% for BuzzFeed, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -25. 8% for BZFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOGL leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BZFD or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for Alphabet Inc. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 299. 3% to $43. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BZFD or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO?

In this comparison, GOOGL (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. BZFD, NFLX, FUBO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BZFD or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, BZFD: -97. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BZFD and NFLX and GOOGL and FUBO?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BZFD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BZFD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 33%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOOGL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FUBO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 124%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BZFD and NFLX and GOOGL and FUBO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BZFD: 66.9% · NFLX: 17.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.