Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BZFD vs TPVG vs IAC vs HRZN vs ZETA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Internet Content & Information
Asset Management
Software - Application
BZFD vs TPVG vs IAC vs HRZN vs ZETA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Asset Management | Internet Content & Information | Asset Management | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $30M | $243M | $3.21B | $199M | $3.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $185M | $97M | $2.25B | $40M | $1.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-58M | $-12M | $41M | $28M | $-23M |
| Gross Margin | 40.5% | 83.5% | 64.6% | 18.0% | 63.8% |
| Operating Margin | -25.8% | 77.9% | 1.5% | -4.0% | -0.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.2x | — | 6.1x | 18.7x |
| Total Debt | $86M | $469M | $1.43B | $473M | $197M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $20M | $960M | $106M | $320M |
BZFD vs TPVG vs IAC vs HRZN vs ZETA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 38.0 | -62.0% |
| IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| Horizon Technology … (HRZN) | 100 | 26.3 | -73.7% |
| Zeta Global Holding… (ZETA) | 100 | 203.9 | +103.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BZFD vs TPVG vs IAC vs HRZN vs ZETA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BZFD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TPVG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 7.4% vs HRZN's 7.1%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
- 50.6% margin vs BZFD's -31.2%
IAC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 29.8%, current ratio 2.75x
HRZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 27.8%
- PEG 0.26 vs TPVG's 6.14
- Beta 0.70, yield 27.8%, current ratio 1.24x
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 18.7x)
ZETA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.7%, EPS growth 63.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.2%
- 94.4% 10Y total return vs IAC's 347.8%
- +30.9% vs BZFD's -56.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 18.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs BZFD's -31.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs ZETA's 2.79 | |
| Dividends | 27.8% yield, vs TPVG's 17.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.9% vs BZFD's -56.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.6% ROA vs BZFD's -28.4%, ROIC -0.2% vs -27.8% |
BZFD vs TPVG vs IAC vs HRZN vs ZETA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BZFD vs TPVG vs IAC vs HRZN vs ZETA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
ZETA leads 2 • TPVG leads 1 • BZFD leads 0 • IAC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 56.1x HRZN's $40M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BZFD's -31.2%. On growth, BZFD holds the edge at +66.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $185M | $97M | $2.2B | $40M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | -$22M | $129M | $19M | $77M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$58M | -$12M | $41M | $28M | -$23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $35M | $60M | $67M | $200M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.5% | +83.5% | +64.6% | +18.0% | +63.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -25.8% | +77.9% | +1.5% | -4.0% | -0.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.2% | +50.6% | +1.8% | -6.6% | -1.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | -58.7% | +2.7% | +141.5% | +13.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.9% | — | -25.9% | — | +49.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.2% | -2.3% | +64.8% | -29.6% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HRZN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.3x trailing earnings, HRZN trades at a 13% valuation discount to TPVG's 4.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRZN offers better value at 0.18x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30M | $243M | $3.2B | $199M | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $108M | $691M | $3.7B | $567M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.53x | 4.91x | -32.42x | 4.30x | -123.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.23x | — | 6.10x | 18.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x | — | 0.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.13x | 14.30x | — | 47.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 2.50x | 1.34x | 4.97x | 2.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 0.68x | 0.70x | 0.60x | 4.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 71.54x | 3.51x | 20.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZETA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRZN delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-75 for BZFD. ZETA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BZFD's 1.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPVG scores 5/9 vs BZFD's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -75.2% | -3.4% | +0.9% | +9.0% | -3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.4% | -1.5% | +0.6% | +3.6% | -1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.8% | +7.2% | -1.2% | -0.2% | +0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.0% | +9.4% | -1.3% | -0.2% | +0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.71x | 1.33x | 0.30x | 1.49x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $77M | $449M | $466M | $368M | -$123M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $20M | $960M | $106M | $320M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $86M | $469M | $1.4B | $473M | $197M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.78x | -1.02x | 4.84x | 0.60x | 5.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ZETA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZETA five years ago would be worth $19,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $208 for BZFD. Over the past 12 months, ZETA leads with a +30.9% total return vs BZFD's -56.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZETA at 27.8% vs BZFD's -29.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.4% | -6.3% | +10.5% | -26.7% | -13.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.6% | +19.3% | +22.1% | -23.2% | +30.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.5% | -3.4% | -2.9% | -27.7% | +108.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -13.5% | -67.3% | -32.8% | +94.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +93.3% | +347.8% | +52.9% | +94.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.2% | -1.2% | -1.0% | -10.3% | +27.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IAC and HRZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HRZN is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZETA's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IAC currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs BZFD's 30.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.50x | 0.77x | 1.04x | 0.77x | 2.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.68 | $7.53 | $45.78 | $8.46 | $24.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.54 | $4.48 | $29.56 | $3.80 | $12.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.4% | +79.5% | +94.2% | +53.3% | +69.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.6 | 58.3 | 48.1 | 58.5 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 232K | 504K | 1.1M | 1.2M | 7.3M |
Analyst Outlook
HRZN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TPVG as "Hold", IAC as "Buy", HRZN as "Hold", ZETA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.4% upside for ZETA (target: $26) vs 19.0% for IAC (target: $51). For income investors, HRZN offers the higher dividend yield at 27.80% vs TPVG's 17.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 | $51.33 | $6.50 | $26.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 33 | 22 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +17.1% | — | +27.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 | — | $1.25 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +9.8% | 0.0% | +3.2% |
HRZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). ZETA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
BZFD vs TPVG vs IAC vs HRZN vs ZETA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BZFD or TPVG or IAC or HRZN or ZETA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BZFD or TPVG or IAC or HRZN or ZETA?
On trailing P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the cheapest at 4.
3x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. at 4. 9x. On forward P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation wins at 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BZFD or TPVG or IAC or HRZN or ZETA?
Over the past 5 years, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
(ZETA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -97. 9% for BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +357. 5% versus BZFD's -97. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BZFD or TPVG or IAC or HRZN or ZETA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
77β versus Zeta Global Holdings Corp. 's 2. 72β — meaning ZETA is approximately 255% more volatile than HRZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 171% for BuzzFeed, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BZFD or TPVG or IAC or HRZN or ZETA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation grew EPS 756. 3% year-over-year, compared to -68. 1% for BuzzFeed, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZETA leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BZFD or TPVG or IAC or HRZN or ZETA?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -31. 2% for BuzzFeed, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -25. 8% for BZFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BZFD or TPVG or IAC or HRZN or ZETA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for Zeta Global Holdings Corp. — 12. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZETA: 52. 4% to $26. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — BZFD or TPVG or IAC or HRZN or ZETA?
In this comparison, HRZN (27.
8% yield), TPVG (17. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BZFD, IAC, ZETA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BZFD or TPVG or IAC or HRZN or ZETA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 17. 1% yield). BuzzFeed, Inc. (BZFD) carries a higher beta of 2. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +91. 2%, BZFD: -97. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BZFD and TPVG and IAC and HRZN and ZETA?
These companies operate in different sectors (BZFD (Communication Services) and TPVG (Financial Services) and IAC (Technology) and HRZN (Financial Services) and ZETA (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BZFD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HRZN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ZETA is a small-cap high-growth stock. TPVG, HRZN pay a dividend while BZFD, IAC, ZETA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 33%
- Gross Margin > 24%
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Dividend Yield > 11.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.