CAAP vs PAC

For growth investors, Corporación América Airports S.

A. (CAAP) is the stronger pick with 31. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 4% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. (PAC). Corporación América Airports S. A. (CAAP) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (12. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Corporación América Airports S. A. (CAAP) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Corporación América Airports S.

A. (CAAP) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. at 21. 8x. On forward P/E, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Corporación América Airports S.

A. (CAAP) delivered a total return of +351. 9%, compared to +164. 5% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. (PAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAC returned +215. 5% versus CAAP's +58. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.

A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 59β versus Corporación América Airports S. A. 's 1. 24β — meaning CAAP is approximately 110% more volatile than PAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Corporación América Airports S. A. (CAAP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 188% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Corporación América Airports S.

A. (CAAP) is pulling ahead at 31. 7% versus 21. 4% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. (PAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Corporación América Airports S. A. grew EPS 18. 1% year-over-year, compared to 12. 6% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAAP leads at 37. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.

A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 7% net margin versus 15. 3% for Corporación América Airports S. A. — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAC leads at 54. 0% versus 22. 1% for CAAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAC leads at 77. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.

A. B. de C. V. (PAC) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 2x for Corporación América Airports S. A. — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAAP: 19. 1% to $31. 00.

In this comparison, PAC (3.

9% yield) pays a dividend. CAAP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.

A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 3. 9% yield, +215. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAC: +215. 5%, CAAP: +58. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

PAC pays a dividend while CAAP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.