Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CAAP vs VLRS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
CAAP vs VLRS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $4.12B | $883M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.93B | $3.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $183M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 11.8% |
| Operating Margin | 23.1% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.17B | $3.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $440M | $754M |
CAAP vs VLRS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corporación América… (CAAP) | 100 | 1029.8 | +929.8% |
| Controladora Vuela … (VLRS) | 100 | 153.6 | +53.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAAP vs VLRS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAAP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.29
- Rev growth 31.7%, EPS growth 18.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 37.6%
- 53.8% 10Y total return vs VLRS's -62.3%
VLRS is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Better valuation composite
- +90.6% vs CAAP's +24.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.7% revenue growth vs VLRS's -3.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.5% margin vs VLRS's -3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.29 vs VLRS's 1.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +90.6% vs CAAP's +24.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs VLRS's -1.8%, ROIC 15.2% vs 3.0% |
CAAP vs VLRS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAAP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VLRS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 1.6x CAAP's $1.9B. CAAP is the more profitable business, keeping 9.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VLRS's -3.4%. On growth, CAAP holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $686M | $642M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $183M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $353M | $388M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.1% | +11.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | -3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +12.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.2% | +5.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | -91.0% |
Valuation Metrics
VLRS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, VLRS's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAAP's 7.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $883M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.34x | -8.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.83x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.90x | 5.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.23x | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.68x | 3.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.47x | 1.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAAP leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAAP delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-38 for VLRS. CAAP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VLRS's 14.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAAP scores 7/9 vs VLRS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | -38.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | -1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.2% | +3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.7% | +3.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 14.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $729M | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $440M | $754M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.34x | 0.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAAP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAAP five years ago would be worth $43,726 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,374 for VLRS. Over the past 12 months, VLRS leads with a +90.6% total return vs CAAP's +24.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAAP at 30.6% vs VLRS's -13.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | -16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.2% | +90.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.7% | -35.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +337.3% | -56.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.8% | -62.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.6% | -13.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CAAP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAAP is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VLRS's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAAP currently trades 82.7% from its 52-week high vs VLRS's 71.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 1.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.50 | $10.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.36 | $3.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.7% | +71.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.3 | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 255K | 721K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CAAP as "Buy" and VLRS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.5% upside for VLRS (target: $11) vs 22.9% for CAAP (target: $31).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.00 | $10.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CAAP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VLRS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CAAP vs VLRS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAAP or VLRS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Corporación América Airports S.
A. (CAAP) is the stronger pick with 31. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V. (VLRS). Corporación América Airports S. A. (CAAP) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Corporación América Airports S. A. (CAAP) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CAAP or VLRS?
Over the past 5 years, Corporación América Airports S.
A. (CAAP) delivered a total return of +337. 3%, compared to -56. 3% for Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V. (VLRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAAP returned +53. 8% versus VLRS's -62. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CAAP or VLRS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Corporación América Airports S.
A. (CAAP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V. 's 1. 62β — meaning VLRS is approximately 26% more volatile than CAAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Corporación América Airports S. A. (CAAP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 15% for Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CAAP or VLRS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Corporación América Airports S.
A. (CAAP) is pulling ahead at 31. 7% versus -3. 3% for Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V. (VLRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Corporación América Airports S. A. grew EPS 18. 1% year-over-year, compared to -181. 8% for Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAAP leads at 37. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CAAP or VLRS?
Corporación América Airports S.
A. (CAAP) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 3% net margin versus -3. 4% for Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V. — meaning it keeps 15. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAAP leads at 22. 1% versus 4. 4% for VLRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAAP leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CAAP or VLRS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VLRS: 38.
5% to $10. 64.
07Which pays a better dividend — CAAP or VLRS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CAAP or VLRS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Corporación América Airports S.
A. (CAAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29)). Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S. A. B. de C. V. (VLRS) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAAP: +53. 8%, VLRS: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CAAP and VLRS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CAAP is a small-cap high-growth stock; VLRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.