Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CAE vs KTOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
CAE vs KTOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $8.69B | $10.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.83B | $1.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $436M | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 28.1% | 18.3% |
| Operating Margin | 16.4% | 1.8% |
| Forward P/E | 22.6x | 73.5x |
| Total Debt | $3.47B | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $294M | $561M |
CAE vs KTOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAE Inc. (CAE) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 307.3 | +207.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAE vs KTOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.16
- Lower volatility, beta 1.16, Low D/E 69.7%, current ratio 0.80x
- Beta 1.16, current ratio 0.80x
KTOS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs CAE's 139.4%
- 18.5% revenue growth vs CAE's 9.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs CAE's 9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.6x vs 73.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs KTOS's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.16 vs KTOS's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.1% vs CAE's +4.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs KTOS's 1.0%, ROIC 7.1% vs 1.4% |
CAE vs KTOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CAE vs KTOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAE is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 3.4x KTOS's $1.4B. CAE is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KTOS's 2.1%. On growth, KTOS holds the edge at +22.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.8B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $436M | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $414M | -$133M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +18.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | -9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.8% | +22.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.3% | +133.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CAE leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.0x trailing earnings, CAE trades at a 93% valuation discount to KTOS's 438.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAE's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KTOS's 118.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.7B | $10.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.0B | $10.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.02x | 438.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.57x | 73.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 15.87x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.14x | 118.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.52x | 7.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.37x | 4.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.21x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAE delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $1 for KTOS. KTOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAE scores 6/9 vs KTOS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.1% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.2B | -$381M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $294M | $561M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.5B | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.59x | 6.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KTOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KTOS five years ago would be worth $21,025 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,607 for CAE. Over the past 12 months, KTOS leads with a +58.1% total return vs CAE's +4.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KTOS at 62.8% vs CAE's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.6% | -28.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.6% | +58.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.4% | +331.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | +110.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.4% | +1231.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | +62.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CAE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAE is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KTOS's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAE currently trades 78.9% from its 52-week high vs KTOS's 42.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 1.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.24 | $134.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.88 | $32.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.9% | +42.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 38.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 720K | 4.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CAE as "Buy" and KTOS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 94.0% upside for KTOS (target: $111) vs -0.0% for CAE (target: $27).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $110.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
CAE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KTOS leads in 1 (Total Returns).
CAE vs KTOS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAE or KTOS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 9% for CAE Inc. (CAE). CAE Inc. (CAE) offers the better valuation at 29. 0x trailing P/E (22. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CAE Inc. (CAE) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAE or KTOS?
On trailing P/E, CAE Inc.
(CAE) is the cheapest at 29. 0x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 438. 5x. On forward P/E, CAE Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAE or KTOS?
Over the past 5 years, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) delivered a total return of +110. 3%, compared to -13. 9% for CAE Inc. (CAE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTOS returned +1232% versus CAE's +139. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAE or KTOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CAE Inc.
(CAE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning KTOS is approximately 59% more volatile than CAE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 70% for CAE Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CAE or KTOS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus 9. 9% for CAE Inc. (CAE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CAE Inc. grew EPS 224. 5% year-over-year, compared to 18. 2% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KTOS leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAE or KTOS?
CAE Inc.
(CAE) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus 1. 6% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAE leads at 15. 5% versus 2. 1% for KTOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAE leads at 27. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAE or KTOS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CAE Inc.
(CAE) trades at 22. 6x forward P/E versus 73. 5x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 50. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KTOS: 94. 0% to $110. 58.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAE or KTOS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CAE or KTOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1232% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KTOS: +1232%, CAE: +139. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAE and KTOS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CAE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.