Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CAG vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
CAG vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $6.70B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.18B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 24.6% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.2x | 44.9x |
| Total Debt | $8.31B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68M | $10.73B |
CAG vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) | 100 | 40.2 | -59.8% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 316.3 | +216.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAG vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 10.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 93.0%, current ratio 0.71x
- PEG 1.18 vs WMT's 4.08
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs CAG's -27.6%
- 4.7% revenue growth vs CAG's -4.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs CAG's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.2x vs 44.9x), PEG 1.18 vs 4.08 | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.3% margin vs CAG's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs WMT's 0.12 | |
| Dividends | 10.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs CAG's -34.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs CAG's 0.1%, ROIC 14.7% vs 6.0% |
CAG vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CAG vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 62.9x CAG's $11.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.3% (WMT) to 0.1% (CAG). On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.2B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $634M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.8% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CAG leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.8x trailing earnings, CAG trades at a 88% valuation discount to WMT's 47.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CAG offers better value at 0.83x vs WMT's 4.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.7B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.9B | $1.10T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.81x | 47.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.24x | 44.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.83x | 4.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.51x | 24.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 10.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.14x | 25.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $0 for CAG. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAG's 0.93x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.2% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.93x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.2B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.3B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.56x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,774 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,499 for CAG. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.6% total return vs CAG's -34.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 38.1% vs CAG's -21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.0% | +16.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.5% | +32.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.9% | +163.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.0% | +187.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.6% | +517.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.6% | +38.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAG and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAG is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMT's 0.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs CAG's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.79 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.61 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.8% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.7 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14.2M | 17.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CAG and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CAG as "Hold" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for CAG (target: $18) vs 4.8% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, CAG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.99% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.55 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.0% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +0.8% |
WMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CAG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CAG vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAG or WMT a better buy right now?
Conagra Brands, Inc.
(CAG) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAG or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Conagra Brands, Inc.
(CAG) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 9x. On forward P/E, Conagra Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Conagra Brands, Inc. wins at 1. 18x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 08x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAG or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +187. 7%, compared to -45. 0% for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +517. 6% versus CAG's -27. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAG or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Conagra Brands, Inc.
(CAG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus Walmart Inc. 's 0. 12β — meaning WMT is approximately 89% more volatile than CAG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 93% for Conagra Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CAG or WMT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc.
grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Conagra Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAG or WMT?
Conagra Brands, Inc.
(CAG) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAG leads at 11. 8% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAG leads at 25. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAG or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 18x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 08x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) trades at 8. 2x forward P/E versus 44. 9x for Walmart Inc. — 36. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAG: 25. 4% to $17. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAG or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) offers the highest yield at 10. 0%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is CAG or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +517. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +517. 6%, CAG: -27. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAG and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CAG is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.