CALX vs VIAV

For growth investors, Calix, Inc.

(CALX) is the stronger pick with 20. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 4% for Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV). Calix, Inc. (CALX) offers the better valuation at 170. 5x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Calix, Inc. (CALX) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Calix, Inc.

(CALX) is the cheapest at 170. 5x versus Viavi Solutions Inc. at 353. 3x. On forward P/E, Calix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, Viavi Solutions Inc.

(VIAV) delivered a total return of +227. 4%, compared to -4. 3% for Calix, Inc. (CALX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VIAV returned +734. 6% versus CALX's +534. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Calix, Inc.

(CALX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Viavi Solutions Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning VIAV is approximately 55% more volatile than CALX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 89% for Viavi Solutions Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Calix, Inc.

(CALX) is pulling ahead at 20. 3% versus 8. 4% for Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viavi Solutions Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to 157. 8% for Calix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CALX leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Viavi Solutions Inc.

(VIAV) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus 1. 8% for Calix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VIAV leads at 6. 5% versus 2. 1% for CALX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VIAV leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Calix, Inc.

(CALX) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 57. 3x for Viavi Solutions Inc. — 32. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CALX: 37. 6% to $61. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Calix, Inc.

(CALX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +534. 3% 10Y return). Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CALX: +534. 3%, VIAV: +734. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CALX is a small-cap high-growth stock; VIAV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.