Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NVDA | 65.5% revenue growth vs CAMT's 36.1% |
| Value | NVDA | Lower P/E (21.9x vs 48.2x), PEG 0.23 vs 1.38 |
| Quality / Margins | NVDA | 55.6% net margin vs CAMT's 28.4% |
| Stability / Safety | NVDA | Beta 1.73 vs CAMT's 1.83, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CAMT | 0.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CAMT | +124.6% vs NVDA's +41.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NVDA | 58.1% ROA vs CAMT's 13.7%, ROIC 81.8% vs 13.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Camtek designs and manufactures specialized inspection and metrology equipment for semiconductor manufacturers — particularly for advanced packaging, memory, and image sensor production. It generates revenue primarily from selling its Eagle-series inspection systems and related services to chipmakers across Asia, the US, and Europe. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary 2D and 3D inspection technologies that address complex semiconductor manufacturing challenges where precision is critical.
NVIDIA designs and sells graphics processing units (GPUs) and accelerated computing platforms that power artificial intelligence, gaming, and professional visualization applications. The company generates revenue primarily through its Data Center segment — which includes AI chips and systems — accounting for over 70% of sales, supplemented by its Gaming GPU business and professional visualization offerings. NVIDIA's competitive moat stems from its CUDA software ecosystem — which locks developers into its hardware architecture — and its years of architectural leadership in parallel processing for AI workloads.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
NVDA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). CAMT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 457.9x CAMT's $472M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAMT's 28.4%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CAMTCamtek Ltd. | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $472M | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $161M | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $134M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.3% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.2% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.1% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
At 36.2x trailing earnings, NVDA trades at a 48% valuation discount to CAMT's 69.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.38x vs CAMT's 1.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | CAMTCamtek Ltd. | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.2B | $4.31T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.3B | $4.31T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 69.17x | 36.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 48.24x | 21.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.98x | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 32.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 19.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.05x | 27.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $21 for CAMT. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAMT's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAMT scores 7/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CAMTCamtek Ltd. | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.4% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.7% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.7% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.8% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $81M | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $126M | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $207M | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4356.62x | 545.03x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $128,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56,827 for CAMT. Over the past 12 months, CAMT leads with a +124.6% total return vs NVDA's +41.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 96.9% vs CAMT's 83.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CAMTCamtek Ltd. | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.9% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +124.6% | +41.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +522.1% | +663.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +468.3% | +1181.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8757.0% | +22525.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +83.9% | +96.9% |
Risk & Volatility
NVDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAMT's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAMT currently trades 95.9% from its 52-week high vs NVDA's 83.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CAMTCamtek Ltd. | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $174.61 | $212.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $47.41 | $86.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.9% | +83.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.4 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 423K | 136.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CAMT as "Buy" and NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.9% upside for NVDA (target: $271) vs -1.1% for CAMT (target: $166). CAMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CAMTCamtek Ltd. | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $165.60 | $271.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.22 | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +0.9% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) | 100 | 1,405.35 | +1305.3% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2,791.13 | +2691.1% |
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) returned +1.2K% over 5 years vs Camtek Ltd. (CAMT)'s +468%. A $10,000 investment in NVDA 5 years ago would be worth $128,116 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) | $93M | $429M | +359.1% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | $6.9B | $215.9B | +3025.0% |
NVIDIA Corporation's revenue grew from $6.9B (2017) to $215.9B (2026) — a 46.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) | 14.9% | 27.6% | +84.9% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 24.1% | 55.6% | +130.6% |
NVIDIA Corporation's net margin went from 24% (2017) to 56% (2026).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) | 14.7 | 33.4 | +127.2% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 75.6 | 36.2 | -52.1% |
Camtek Ltd. has traded in a 13x–43x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~69x. NVIDIA Corporation has traded in a 28x–291x P/E range over 10 years; current trailing P/E is ~36x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) | 0.39 | 2.42 | +520.5% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 0.06 | 4.9 | +7556.3% |
NVIDIA Corporation's EPS grew from $0.06 (2017) to $4.90 (2026) — a 62% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Camtek Ltd. generated $112M FCF in 2024 (+97% vs 2021). NVIDIA Corporation generated $97B FCF in 2026 (+1960% vs 2021).
CAMT vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAMT or NVDA a better buy right now?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 36.2x trailing P/E (21.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAMT or NVDA?
On trailing P/E, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the cheapest at 36.2x versus Camtek Ltd. at 69.2x. On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 21.9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0.23x versus Camtek Ltd.'s 1.38x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAMT or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1181%, compared to +468.3% for Camtek Ltd. (CAMT). A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth approximately $128K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +225.3% versus CAMT's +87.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAMT or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.73β versus Camtek Ltd.'s 1.83β — meaning CAMT is approximately 6% more volatile than NVDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 38% for Camtek Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CAMT or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.6% net margin versus 27.6% for Camtek Ltd. — meaning it keeps 55.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60.4% versus 25.2% for CAMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CAMT or NVDA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.23x versus Camtek Ltd.'s 1.38x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 21.9x forward P/E versus 48.2x for Camtek Ltd. — 26.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 52.9% to $271.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CAMT or NVDA?
In this comparison, CAMT (0.7% yield) pays a dividend. NVDA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CAMT or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.7% yield). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1.73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAMT: +87.6%, NVDA: +225.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CAMT and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. CAMT pays a dividend while NVDA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.