Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CAPL vs MMLP vs SUNS vs NGL vs GLP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
REIT - Residential
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
CAPL vs MMLP vs SUNS vs NGL vs GLP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Midstream | REIT - Residential | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $812M | $100M | $103M | $2.00B | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.62B | $711M | $26M | $3.03B | $18.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $60M | $-20M | $12M | $159M | $82M |
| Gross Margin | 8.5% | 22.3% | 79.9% | 46.8% | 5.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 5.8% | 53.4% | 13.3% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 49.5x | — | 6.6x | 47.4x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $908M | $525M | $122M | $3.08B | $1.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $49K | $6M | $6M | $12M |
CAPL vs MMLP vs SUNS vs NGL vs GLP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrossAmerica Partne… (CAPL) | 100 | 105.0 | +5.0% |
| Martin Midstream Pa… (MMLP) | 100 | 65.1 | -34.9% |
| Sunrise Realty Trus… (SUNS) | 100 | 64.3 | -35.8% |
| NGL Energy Partners… (NGL) | 100 | 350.7 | +250.7% |
| Global Partners LP (GLP) | 100 | 119.3 | +19.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAPL vs MMLP vs SUNS vs NGL vs GLP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 9.9%
- Beta 0.06 vs SUNS's 0.86
- 6.0% ROA vs MMLP's -3.9%, ROIC 18.1% vs 8.0%
MMLP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SUNS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 148.1% FFO/revenue growth vs NGL's -16.5%
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 47.4x)
- 46.0% margin vs MMLP's -2.8%
- 15.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NGL's 14.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
NGL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.67, yield 14.3%, current ratio 1.30x
- +417.0% vs MMLP's -14.5%
GLP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth -12.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.6%
- 455.9% 10Y total return vs NGL's 78.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, current ratio 1.14x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 148.1% FFO/revenue growth vs NGL's -16.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 47.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.0% margin vs MMLP's -2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs SUNS's 0.86 | |
| Dividends | 15.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NGL's 14.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +417.0% vs MMLP's -14.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs MMLP's -3.9%, ROIC 18.1% vs 8.0% |
CAPL vs MMLP vs SUNS vs NGL vs GLP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CAPL vs MMLP vs SUNS vs NGL vs GLP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SUNS leads in 3 of 6 categories
NGL leads 1 • CAPL leads 0 • MMLP leads 0 • GLP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUNS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLP is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.6B annually — 703.8x SUNS's $26M. SUNS is the more profitable business, keeping 46.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MMLP's -2.8%. On growth, SUNS holds the edge at +108.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.6B | $711M | $26M | $3.0B | $18.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $200M | $91M | $16M | $672M | $340M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $60M | -$20M | $12M | $159M | $82M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $75M | $15M | -$3M | $291M | $238M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +22.3% | +79.9% | +46.8% | +5.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +5.8% | +53.4% | +13.3% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | -2.8% | +46.0% | +5.3% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +2.2% | -13.0% | +9.6% | +1.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -2.5% | +108.1% | -41.3% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | -5.6% | -55.6% | +4.2% | +3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SUNS and GLP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, SUNS trades at a 64% valuation discount to GLP's 22.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAPL's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLP's 13.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $812M | $100M | $103M | $2.0B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $625M | $219M | $5.1B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.54x | -6.95x | 8.12x | -26.88x | 22.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.53x | — | 6.58x | 47.44x | 14.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.80x | 6.44x | 12.93x | 8.51x | 13.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 0.14x | 3.92x | 0.58x | 0.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 0.54x | 3.05x | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.57x | 7.17x | — | 38.67x | 5.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NGL delivers a 132.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $133 in annual profit, vs $7 for SUNS. SUNS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NGL's 4.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NGL scores 7/9 vs SUNS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | +6.6% | +132.6% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | -3.9% | +4.6% | +3.6% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.1% | +8.0% | +6.0% | +6.4% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.4% | +11.4% | +5.4% | +8.3% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.67x | 4.42x | 2.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $905M | $525M | $116M | $3.1B | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $49,000 | $6M | $6M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $908M | $525M | $122M | $3.1B | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.86x | 0.72x | 3.53x | 2.15x | 2.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NGL five years ago would be worth $72,658 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,945 for SUNS. Over the past 12 months, NGL leads with a +417.0% total return vs MMLP's -14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NGL at 80.6% vs SUNS's -3.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.4% | -4.6% | -13.4% | +62.9% | +14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.7% | -14.5% | -12.3% | +417.0% | +1.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.7% | +5.0% | -10.5% | +488.7% | +86.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.1% | +14.4% | -10.5% | +626.6% | +149.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.5% | -57.7% | -10.5% | +78.8% | +455.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.4% | +1.6% | -3.6% | +80.6% | +23.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAPL and NGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SUNS's 0.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NGL currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs SUNS's 65.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 0.39x | 0.86x | 0.67x | 0.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.62 | $3.54 | $11.78 | $16.69 | $56.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.61 | $2.21 | $7.39 | $2.98 | $39.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.2% | +72.6% | +65.4% | +96.6% | +84.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 38.5 | 47.0 | 65.0 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 50K | 19K | 105K | 238K | 41K |
Analyst Outlook
SUNS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAPL as "Hold", MMLP as "Buy", SUNS as "Hold", NGL as "Hold", GLP as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply 97.8% upside for SUNS (target: $15) vs -87.6% for NGL (target: $2). For income investors, SUNS offers the higher dividend yield at 15.25% vs MMLP's 0.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $15.25 | $2.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 11 | 8 | 17 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.9% | +0.8% | +15.3% | +14.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.10 | $0.02 | $1.18 | $2.31 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
SUNS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NGL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CAPL vs MMLP vs SUNS vs NGL vs GLP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAPL or MMLP or SUNS or NGL or GLP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the stronger pick with 148. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 5% for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL). Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAPL or MMLP or SUNS or NGL or GLP?
On trailing P/E, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Global Partners LP at 22. 6x. On forward P/E, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAPL or MMLP or SUNS or NGL or GLP?
Over the past 5 years, NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) delivered a total return of +626.
6%, compared to -10. 5% for Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLP returned +455. 9% versus MMLP's -57. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAPL or MMLP or SUNS or NGL or GLP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. 's 0. 86β — meaning SUNS is approximately 1448% more volatile than CAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 4% for NGL Energy Partners LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CAPL or MMLP or SUNS or NGL or GLP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is pulling ahead at 148. 1% versus -16. 5% for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CrossAmerica Partners LP grew EPS 109. 6% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLP leads at -0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAPL or MMLP or SUNS or NGL or GLP?
Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the more profitable company, earning 46. 0% net margin versus -2. 0% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 46. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SUNS leads at 64. 2% versus 1. 3% for GLP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUNS leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAPL or MMLP or SUNS or NGL or GLP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for CrossAmerica Partners LP — 43. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SUNS: 97. 8% to $15. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAPL or MMLP or SUNS or NGL or GLP?
In this comparison, SUNS (15.
3% yield), NGL (14. 3% yield), CAPL (9. 9% yield), MMLP (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. GLP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CAPL or MMLP or SUNS or NGL or GLP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 9. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAPL: +87. 5%, SUNS: -10. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAPL and MMLP and SUNS and NGL and GLP?
These companies operate in different sectors (CAPL (Energy) and MMLP (Energy) and SUNS (Real Estate) and NGL (Energy) and GLP (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CAPL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MMLP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SUNS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NGL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GLP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CAPL, MMLP, SUNS, NGL pay a dividend while GLP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.