Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CAPL vs SUNS vs MMLP vs GPMT vs TRTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
Oil & Gas Midstream
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
CAPL vs SUNS vs MMLP vs GPMT vs TRTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | REIT - Residential | Oil & Gas Midstream | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $812M | $103M | $100M | $74M | $656M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.62B | $26M | $711M | $132M | $264M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $60M | $12M | $-20M | $-40M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 8.5% | 79.9% | 22.3% | 47.3% | 78.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 53.4% | 5.8% | -4.3% | 51.0% |
| Forward P/E | 49.5x | 6.6x | — | — | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $908M | $122M | $525M | $1.17B | $3.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $6M | $49K | $66M | $88M |
CAPL vs SUNS vs MMLP vs GPMT vs TRTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrossAmerica Partne… (CAPL) | 100 | 105.0 | +5.0% |
| Sunrise Realty Trus… (SUNS) | 100 | 64.3 | -35.8% |
| Martin Midstream Pa… (MMLP) | 100 | 65.1 | -34.9% |
| Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT) | 100 | 52.0 | -48.0% |
| TPG RE Finance Trus… (TRTX) | 100 | 97.1 | -2.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAPL vs SUNS vs MMLP vs GPMT vs TRTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 9.9%
- 87.5% 10Y total return vs TRTX's -1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 0.72x
- Beta 0.06, yield 9.9%, current ratio 0.72x
SUNS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 8.1x)
- 46.0% margin vs GPMT's -30.5%
- 15.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CAPL's 9.9%
Among these 5 stocks, MMLP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GPMT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 187.8%, EPS growth 73.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.9%
- 187.8% FFO/revenue growth vs CAPL's -10.6%
TRTX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +25.7% vs GPMT's -19.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 187.8% FFO/revenue growth vs CAPL's -10.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 8.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.0% margin vs GPMT's -30.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs GPMT's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 15.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CAPL's 9.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.7% vs GPMT's -19.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs MMLP's -3.9%, ROIC 18.1% vs 8.0% |
CAPL vs SUNS vs MMLP vs GPMT vs TRTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CAPL vs SUNS vs MMLP vs GPMT vs TRTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SUNS leads in 3 of 6 categories
MMLP leads 1 • CAPL leads 1 • GPMT leads 0 • TRTX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUNS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 175.2x SUNS's $26M. SUNS is the more profitable business, keeping 46.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPMT's -30.5%. On growth, GPMT holds the edge at +157.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.6B | $26M | $711M | $132M | $264M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $200M | $16M | $91M | -$8M | $144M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $60M | $12M | -$20M | -$40M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $75M | -$3M | $15M | $463,000 | $96M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +79.9% | +22.3% | +47.3% | +78.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +53.4% | +5.8% | -4.3% | +51.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +46.0% | -2.8% | -30.5% | +23.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -13.0% | +2.2% | +0.4% | +36.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +108.1% | -2.5% | +157.8% | -4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | -55.6% | -5.6% | +40.9% | +58.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MMLP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, SUNS trades at a 58% valuation discount to CAPL's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAPL's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPMT's 20.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $812M | $103M | $100M | $74M | $656M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $219M | $625M | $1.2B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.54x | 8.12x | -6.95x | -1.34x | 14.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.53x | 6.58x | — | — | 8.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.80x | 12.93x | 6.44x | 20.75x | 15.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 3.92x | 0.14x | 0.51x | 1.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.54x | — | 0.13x | 0.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.57x | — | 7.17x | 27.85x | 7.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNS delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-7 for GPMT. SUNS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRTX's 3.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GPMT scores 6/9 vs MMLP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.6% | — | -7.1% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | +4.6% | -3.9% | -2.3% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.1% | +6.0% | +8.0% | +2.6% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.4% | +5.4% | +11.4% | +4.6% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x | — | 2.12x | 3.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $905M | $116M | $525M | $1.1B | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $6M | $49,000 | $66M | $88M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $908M | $122M | $525M | $1.2B | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.86x | 3.53x | 0.72x | 0.58x | 1.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CAPL and TRTX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAPL five years ago would be worth $15,614 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,472 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, TRTX leads with a +25.7% total return vs GPMT's -19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRTX at 26.7% vs GPMT's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.4% | -13.4% | -4.6% | -32.5% | -1.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.7% | -12.3% | -14.5% | -19.7% | +25.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.7% | -10.5% | +5.0% | -34.3% | +103.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.1% | -10.5% | +14.4% | -65.3% | +1.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.5% | -10.5% | -57.7% | -50.0% | -1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.4% | -3.6% | +1.6% | -13.1% | +26.7% |
Risk & Volatility
CAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAPL currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs GPMT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 0.86x | 0.39x | 1.44x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.62 | $11.78 | $3.54 | $3.12 | $9.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.61 | $7.39 | $2.21 | $1.24 | $7.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.2% | +65.4% | +72.6% | +49.7% | +86.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 47.0 | 38.5 | 49.4 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 50K | 105K | 19K | 154K | 655K |
Analyst Outlook
SUNS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAPL as "Hold", SUNS as "Hold", MMLP as "Buy", GPMT as "Hold", TRTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.8% upside for SUNS (target: $15) vs 17.8% for TRTX (target: $10). For income investors, SUNS offers the higher dividend yield at 15.25% vs MMLP's 0.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.25 | — | $2.50 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.9% | +15.3% | +0.8% | +14.0% | +13.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.10 | $1.18 | $0.02 | $0.22 | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.6% | +3.9% |
SUNS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MMLP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CAPL vs SUNS vs MMLP vs GPMT vs TRTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAPL or SUNS or MMLP or GPMT or TRTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
(GPMT) is the stronger pick with 187. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 6% for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL). Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAPL or SUNS or MMLP or GPMT or TRTX?
On trailing P/E, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus CrossAmerica Partners LP at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAPL or SUNS or MMLP or GPMT or TRTX?
Over the past 5 years, CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) delivered a total return of +56.
1%, compared to -65. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAPL returned +87. 5% versus MMLP's -57. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAPL or SUNS or MMLP or GPMT or TRTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning GPMT is approximately 2495% more volatile than CAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 3% for TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CAPL or SUNS or MMLP or GPMT or TRTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
(GPMT) is pulling ahead at 187. 8% versus -10. 6% for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CrossAmerica Partners LP grew EPS 109. 6% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPMT leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAPL or SUNS or MMLP or GPMT or TRTX?
Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the more profitable company, earning 46. 0% net margin versus -28. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 46. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRTX leads at 73. 0% versus 5. 6% for CAPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUNS leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAPL or SUNS or MMLP or GPMT or TRTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for CrossAmerica Partners LP — 43. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SUNS: 97. 8% to $15. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAPL or SUNS or MMLP or GPMT or TRTX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) offers the highest yield at 15. 3%, versus 0. 8% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP).
09Is CAPL or SUNS or MMLP or GPMT or TRTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 9. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAPL: +87. 5%, GPMT: -50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAPL and SUNS and MMLP and GPMT and TRTX?
These companies operate in different sectors (CAPL (Energy) and SUNS (Real Estate) and MMLP (Energy) and GPMT (Real Estate) and TRTX (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CAPL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SUNS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MMLP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPMT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRTX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.