Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CARR vs TT vs LII vs JCI vs ALLE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Construction
Construction
Security & Protection Services
CARR vs TT vs LII vs JCI vs ALLE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Construction | Construction | Construction | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $56.73B | $108.05B | $18.84B | $87.61B | $11.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21.87B | $21.60B | $5.26B | $12.49B | $4.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.32B | $2.90B | $783M | $2.36B | $634M |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 35.9% | 33.1% | 71.5% | 45.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.1% | 18.2% | 19.5% | 25.0% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 24.5x | 32.9x | 22.3x | 30.2x | 15.4x |
| Total Debt | $12.67B | $4.62B | $2.06B | $11.19B | $2.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.55B | $1.76B | $34M | $379M | $356M |
CARR vs TT vs LII vs JCI vs ALLE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrier Global Corp… (CARR) | 100 | 331.7 | +231.7% |
| Trane Technologies … (TT) | 100 | 541.2 | +441.2% |
| Lennox Internationa… (LII) | 100 | 253.2 | +153.2% |
| Johnson Controls In… (JCI) | 100 | 455.7 | +355.7% |
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 135.7 | +35.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CARR vs TT vs LII vs JCI vs ALLE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CARR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 15.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- 9.1% 10Y total return vs JCI's 354.6%
LII ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 20.1% ROA vs CARR's 3.5%, ROIC 29.8% vs 6.7%
JCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- 18.9% margin vs CARR's 6.0%
- +62.9% vs LII's -3.5%
ALLE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 1.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, current ratio 1.84x
- PEG 0.91 vs JCI's 1.18
- Beta 0.67, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.84x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.8% revenue growth vs CARR's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.4x vs 30.2x), PEG 0.91 vs 1.18 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.9% margin vs CARR's 6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs LII's 1.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CARR's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.9% vs LII's -3.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.1% ROA vs CARR's 3.5%, ROIC 29.8% vs 6.7% |
CARR vs TT vs LII vs JCI vs ALLE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CARR vs TT vs LII vs JCI vs ALLE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALLE leads in 2 of 6 categories
JCI leads 1 • LII leads 1 • TT leads 1 • CARR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CARR is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.9B annually — 5.3x ALLE's $4.2B. JCI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CARR's 6.0%. On growth, ALLE holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21.9B | $21.6B | $5.3B | $12.5B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.1B | $4.3B | $1.1B | $3.6B | $959M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.3B | $2.9B | $783M | $2.4B | $634M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.7B | $3.2B | $661M | $1.5B | $704M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +35.9% | +33.1% | +71.5% | +45.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +18.2% | +19.5% | +25.0% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +13.4% | +14.9% | +18.9% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +14.6% | +12.6% | +11.7% | +16.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +6.0% | +5.8% | -2.0% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.4% | -1.9% | -0.6% | +45.8% | -7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ALLE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.2x trailing earnings, ALLE trades at a 67% valuation discount to JCI's 54.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALLE offers better value at 1.07x vs JCI's 2.12x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56.7B | $108.0B | $18.8B | $87.6B | $11.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $67.8B | $110.9B | $20.9B | $98.4B | $13.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.94x | 37.61x | 24.36x | 54.43x | 18.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.46x | 32.93x | 22.31x | 30.20x | 15.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.26x | 1.27x | 2.12x | 1.07x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.92x | 26.21x | 18.63x | 26.65x | 13.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.61x | 5.07x | 3.63x | 3.71x | 2.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.07x | 12.69x | 16.34x | 7.23x | 5.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.43x | 38.43x | 29.49x | 90.79x | 16.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LII leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LII delivers a 72.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $72 in annual profit, vs $9 for CARR. TT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LII's 1.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TT scores 9/9 vs LII's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +34.7% | +72.0% | +16.6% | +32.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +13.4% | +20.1% | +6.0% | +12.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.7% | +26.2% | +29.8% | +8.5% | +18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +27.2% | +40.2% | +9.8% | +20.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.90x | 0.54x | 1.77x | 0.86x | 1.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11.1B | $2.9B | $2.0B | $10.8B | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $1.8B | $34M | $379M | $356M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.7B | $4.6B | $2.1B | $11.2B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.76x | 17.21x | 20.51x | 57.59x | 8.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TT five years ago would be worth $27,694 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,300 for ALLE. Over the past 12 months, JCI leads with a +62.9% total return vs LII's -3.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TT at 41.3% vs ALLE's 9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.8% | +22.9% | +8.8% | +17.4% | -15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.9% | +21.0% | -3.5% | +62.9% | -1.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.3% | +182.1% | +97.0% | +134.1% | +31.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.2% | +176.9% | +64.6% | +131.7% | +3.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +500.2% | +906.7% | +321.1% | +354.6% | +125.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | +41.3% | +25.4% | +32.8% | +9.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JCI and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LII's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JCI currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs ALLE's 73.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 0.97x | 1.23x | 0.97x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.09 | $503.47 | $689.44 | $147.32 | $183.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $50.24 | $348.06 | $434.06 | $87.77 | $131.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.7% | +97.0% | +78.5% | +97.2% | +73.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.7 | 56.8 | 58.5 | 60.6 | 31.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.6M | 1.2M | 462K | 3.3M | 883K |
Analyst Outlook
ALLE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CARR as "Buy", TT as "Hold", LII as "Hold", JCI as "Buy", ALLE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.5% upside for ALLE (target: $173) vs -3.6% for JCI (target: $138). For income investors, ALLE offers the higher dividend yield at 1.50% vs TT's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.50 | $518.50 | $553.45 | $138.00 | $172.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 25 | 30 | 45 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +0.8% | +0.9% | +1.0% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 5 | 12 | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.91 | $3.74 | $4.93 | $1.49 | $2.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.1% | +1.4% | +2.7% | +6.8% | +0.7% |
ALLE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). JCI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CARR vs TT vs LII vs JCI vs ALLE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CARR or TT or LII or JCI or ALLE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger pick with 7.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Carrier Global Corporation (CARR). Allegion plc (ALLE) offers the better valuation at 18. 2x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CARR or TT or LII or JCI or ALLE?
On trailing P/E, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the cheapest at 18.
2x versus Johnson Controls International plc at 54. 4x. On forward P/E, Allegion plc is actually cheaper at 15. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allegion plc wins at 0. 91x versus Johnson Controls International plc's 1. 18x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CARR or TT or LII or JCI or ALLE?
Over the past 5 years, Trane Technologies plc (TT) delivered a total return of +176.
9%, compared to +3. 0% for Allegion plc (ALLE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TT returned +906. 7% versus ALLE's +125. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CARR or TT or LII or JCI or ALLE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allegion plc (ALLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Lennox International Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning LII is approximately 85% more volatile than ALLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trane Technologies plc (TT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 177% for Lennox International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CARR or TT or LII or JCI or ALLE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allegion plc (ALLE) is pulling ahead at 7.
8% versus -3. 3% for Carrier Global Corporation (CARR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trane Technologies plc grew EPS 15. 5% year-over-year, compared to -72. 4% for Carrier Global Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TT leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CARR or TT or LII or JCI or ALLE?
Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus 6. 9% for Carrier Global Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALLE leads at 21. 1% versus 9. 9% for CARR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLE leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CARR or TT or LII or JCI or ALLE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus Johnson Controls International plc's 1. 18x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Allegion plc (ALLE) trades at 15. 4x forward P/E versus 32. 9x for Trane Technologies plc — 17. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALLE: 27. 5% to $172. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CARR or TT or LII or JCI or ALLE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Allegion plc (ALLE) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 8% for Trane Technologies plc (TT).
09Is CARR or TT or LII or JCI or ALLE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trane Technologies plc (TT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
97), 0. 8% yield, +906. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TT: +906. 7%, LII: +321. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CARR and TT and LII and JCI and ALLE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.