Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CARV vs HFBL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CARV vs HFBL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $9M | $60M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $32M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $5M |
| Gross Margin | 56.3% | 63.9% |
| Operating Margin | -36.8% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $29M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $16M |
CARV vs HFBL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV) | 100 | 93.8 | -6.2% |
| Home Federal Bancor… (HFBL) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CARV vs HFBL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CARV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.08
- Lower volatility, beta 0.08, Low D/E 98.4%, current ratio 0.15x
- Beta 0.08, current ratio 0.15x
HFBL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -2.9%, EPS growth 7.7%
- 109.8% 10Y total return vs CARV's -53.6%
- NIM 3.1% vs CARV's 2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.9% NII/revenue growth vs CARV's -8.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs CARV's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs HFBL's 0.19 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.8% vs CARV's +18.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs CARV's 0.9% |
CARV vs HFBL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CARV vs HFBL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HFBL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CARV and HFBL operate at a comparable scale, with $37M and $32M in trailing revenue. HFBL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CARV's -36.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $32M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.3% | +63.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.8% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.8% | +12.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -34.6% | +16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.2% | +63.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CARV leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $60M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$12M | $48M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.63x | 15.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.68x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.24x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 1.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HFBL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HFBL delivers a 9.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-48 for CARV. HFBL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CARV's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFBL scores 8/9 vs CARV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -48.4% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.0% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.4% | +8.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.98x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | -$12M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $16M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.71x | 0.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HFBL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HFBL five years ago would be worth $13,358 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,074 for CARV. Over the past 12 months, HFBL leads with a +57.8% total return vs CARV's +18.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HFBL at 9.5% vs CARV's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.3% | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.4% | +57.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.3% | +31.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.3% | +33.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.6% | +109.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.2% | +9.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CARV and HFBL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CARV is the less volatile stock with a 0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HFBL's 0.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HFBL currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs CARV's 43.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.08x | 0.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.85 | $20.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $12.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.4% | +98.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 62.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 2K |
Analyst Outlook
HFBL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
HFBL is the only dividend payer here at 2.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.53 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% |
HFBL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CARV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CARV vs HFBL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CARV or HFBL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the stronger pick with -2. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CARV or HFBL?
Over the past 5 years, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) delivered a total return of +33. 6%, compared to -79. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HFBL returned +109. 8% versus CARV's -53. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CARV or HFBL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carver Bancorp, Inc.
(CARV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 08β versus Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana's 0. 19β — meaning HFBL is approximately 149% more volatile than CARV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 98% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CARV or HFBL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is pulling ahead at -2. 9% versus -8. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana grew EPS 7. 7% year-over-year, compared to -334. 4% for Carver Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CARV or HFBL?
Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus -36. 8% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HFBL leads at 14. 4% versus -36. 8% for CARV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HFBL leads at 63. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CARV or HFBL?
In this comparison, HFBL (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CARV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CARV or HFBL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 2. 7% yield, +109. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HFBL: +109. 8%, CARV: -53. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CARV and HFBL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CARV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HFBL is a small-cap deep-value stock. HFBL pays a dividend while CARV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.