Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CBAT vs SLDP vs QS vs MVST vs ALB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$70M
5Y Perf.-81.3%
SLDP
Solid Power, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$635K
5Y Perf.-69.9%
QS
QuantumScape Corporation

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.51B
5Y Perf.-71.6%
MVST
Microvast Holdings, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$611M
5Y Perf.-82.4%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$23.37B
5Y Perf.+18.7%

CBAT vs SLDP vs QS vs MVST vs ALB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CBAT logoCBAT
SLDP logoSLDP
QS logoQS
MVST logoMVST
ALB logoALB
IndustryElectrical Equipment & PartsElectrical Equipment & PartsAuto - PartsElectrical Equipment & PartsChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$70M$635K$4.51B$611M$23.37B
Revenue (TTM)$162M$19M$0.00$428M$5.49B
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$-91M$-421M$-29M$-233M
Gross Margin10.8%-27.7%28.6%18.5%
Operating Margin-10.5%-5.5%1.6%5.6%
Forward P/E6.0x31.5x22.4x
Total Debt$30M$8M$71M$186M$3.30B
Cash & Equiv.$7M$47M$231M$105M$1.62B

CBAT vs SLDP vs QS vs MVST vs ALBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CBAT
SLDP
QS
MVST
ALB
StockMay 21May 26Return
CBAK Energy Technol… (CBAT)10018.7-81.3%
Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP)10030.1-69.9%
QuantumScape Corpor… (QS)10028.4-71.6%
Microvast Holdings,… (MVST)10017.6-82.4%
Albemarle Corporati… (ALB)100118.7+18.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CBAT vs SLDP vs QS vs MVST vs ALB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ALB leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. QS and MVST also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CBAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 25.1%, current ratio 0.82x
  • Lower P/E (6.0x vs 22.4x)
  • Beta 1.05 vs SLDP's 2.93
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
SLDP
Solid Power, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SLDP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
QS
QuantumScape Corporation
The Quality Compounder

QS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.

  • 2.8% margin vs SLDP's -485.5%
Best for: quality
MVST
Microvast Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

MVST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 12.6%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.9%
  • 12.6% revenue growth vs CBAT's -13.6%
Best for: growth exposure
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
The Income Pick

ALB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 0.8%
  • 217.0% 10Y total return vs QS's -25.6%
  • Beta 1.60, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.23x
  • 0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMVST logoMVST12.6% revenue growth vs CBAT's -13.6%
ValueCBAT logoCBATLower P/E (6.0x vs 22.4x)
Quality / MarginsQS logoQS2.8% margin vs SLDP's -485.5%
Stability / SafetyCBAT logoCBATBeta 1.05 vs SLDP's 2.93
DividendsALB logoALB0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ALB logoALB+256.7% vs CBAT's -6.9%
Efficiency (ROA)ALB logoALB-1.4% ROA vs QS's -33.4%, ROIC 0.6% vs -33.4%

CBAT vs SLDP vs QS vs MVST vs ALB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
FY 2021
TotalHighPowerLithiumBatteriesUsedMember
39.8%$35M
UninterruptableSuppliesMember
38.1%$33M
PrecursorMember
10.4%$9M
CathodeMember
10.0%$9M
LightElectricVehiclesMember
0.8%$733,382
TradingOfRawMaterialsUsedInLithiumBatteriesMember
0.6%$519,796
ElectricVehiclesMember
0.3%$243,837
SLDPSolid Power, Inc.
FY 2025
Government Contract
100.0%$2M
QSQuantumScape Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

MVSTMicrovast Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ALBAlbemarle Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Storage
52.7%$2.7B
Specialties
26.6%$1.4B
Ketjen
20.7%$1.1B

CBAT vs SLDP vs QS vs MVST vs ALB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLALBLAGGINGQS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MVST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ALB and QS operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -4.0% (CBAT) to -4.9% (SLDP). On growth, CBAT holds the edge at +36.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…SLDP logoSLDPSolid Power, Inc.QS logoQSQuantumScape Corp…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$162M$19M$0$428M$5.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$8M-$83M-$394M$32M$802M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M-$91M-$421M-$29M-$233M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M-$75M-$282M$56M$577M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.8%-27.7%+28.6%+18.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-10.5%-5.5%+1.6%+5.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.0%-4.9%-6.8%-4.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.1%-4.0%+13.1%+10.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.5%-48.9%-15.0%+32.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.0%+23.8%+119.2%
MVST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CBAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CBAT's 5.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MVST's 99.0x.

MetricCBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…SLDP logoSLDPSolid Power, Inc.QS logoQSQuantumScape Corp…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Market CapShares × price$70M$634,513$4.5B$611M$23.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$94M-$38M$4.3B$692M$25.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS6.04x-5.73x-9.69x-21.00x-34.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.31.50x22.36x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.22x99.04x33.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.40x0.03x1.43x4.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.59x1.30x3.63x1.49x2.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.13x10.89x33.76x
CBAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — CBAT and ALB each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

ALB delivers a -2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-37 for QS. SLDP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MVST's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBAT scores 7/9 vs QS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…SLDP logoSLDPSolid Power, Inc.QS logoQSQuantumScape Corp…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-5.5%-21.6%-37.3%-7.4%-2.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.0%-23.5%-33.4%-2.9%-1.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.6%-19.6%-33.4%+0.9%+0.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.0%-23.2%-37.7%+1.2%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975456
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.25x0.02x0.06x0.45x0.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$23M-$39M-$160M$81M$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$47M$231M$105M$1.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$30M$8M$71M$186M$3.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-24.86x-488.79x-215.16x-16.53x1.59x
Evenly matched — CBAT and ALB each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ALB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ALB five years ago would be worth $12,680 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,559 for MVST. Over the past 12 months, ALB leads with a +256.7% total return vs CBAT's -6.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MVST at 16.7% vs CBAT's 0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…SLDP logoSLDPSolid Power, Inc.QS logoQSQuantumScape Corp…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-8.7%-37.2%-33.4%-33.0%+38.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.9%+143.3%+90.2%-2.1%+256.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2.0%+30.9%+15.2%+58.8%+9.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-81.0%-70.8%-76.3%-84.4%+26.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-69.9%-70.8%-25.6%-80.7%+217.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.7%+9.4%+4.8%+16.7%+3.0%
ALB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CBAT and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CBAT is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLDP's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALB currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs MVST's 26.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…SLDP logoSLDPSolid Power, Inc.QS logoQSQuantumScape Corp…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.05x2.93x2.61x2.45x1.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.25$8.86$19.07$7.12$221.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.77$1.12$3.80$1.37$53.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+62.8%+33.0%+38.6%+26.5%+89.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.648.866.354.453.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded111K5.6M15.5M3.9M2.0M
Evenly matched — CBAT and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ALB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SLDP as "Buy", QS as "Hold", MVST as "Buy", ALB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 154.0% upside for MVST (target: $5) vs -3.8% for ALB (target: $191). ALB is the only dividend payer here at 0.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…SLDP logoSLDPSolid Power, Inc.QS logoQSQuantumScape Corp…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.20$4.80$190.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts511645
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.62
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
ALB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ALB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). MVST leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallAlbemarle Corporation (ALB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CBAT vs SLDP vs QS vs MVST vs ALB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CBAT or SLDP or QS or MVST or ALB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Microvast Holdings, Inc.

(MVST) is the stronger pick with 12. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 6% for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT). CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CBAT or SLDP or QS or MVST or ALB?

On forward P/E, Albemarle Corporation is actually cheaper at 22.

4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CBAT or SLDP or QS or MVST or ALB?

Over the past 5 years, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) delivered a total return of +26.

8%, compared to -84. 4% for Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALB returned +217. 0% versus MVST's -80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CBAT or SLDP or QS or MVST or ALB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.

(CBAT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Solid Power, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SLDP is approximately 180% more volatile than CBAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 45% for Microvast Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CBAT or SLDP or QS or MVST or ALB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Microvast Holdings, Inc.

(MVST) is pulling ahead at 12. 6% versus -13. 6% for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. grew EPS 574. 5% year-over-year, compared to 5. 6% for Solid Power, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CBAT leads at 49. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CBAT or SLDP or QS or MVST or ALB?

CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.

(CBAT) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 7% net margin versus -429. 5% for Solid Power, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBAT leads at 5. 0% versus -463. 7% for SLDP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MVST leads at 28. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CBAT or SLDP or QS or MVST or ALB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) trades at 22.

4x forward P/E versus 31. 5x for Microvast Holdings, Inc. — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVST: 154. 0% to $4. 80.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CBAT or SLDP or QS or MVST or ALB?

In this comparison, ALB (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. CBAT, SLDP, QS, MVST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CBAT or SLDP or QS or MVST or ALB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

8% yield, +217. 0% 10Y return). Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALB: +217. 0%, MVST: -80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CBAT and SLDP and QS and MVST and ALB?

These companies operate in different sectors (CBAT (Industrials) and SLDP (Industrials) and QS (Consumer Cyclical) and MVST (Industrials) and ALB (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CBAT is a small-cap deep-value stock; SLDP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MVST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ALB pays a dividend while CBAT, SLDP, QS, MVST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CBAT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLDP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

QS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MVST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CBAT and SLDP and QS and MVST and ALB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CBAT: 36.5% · SLDP: -48.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.