CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$71M
5Y Perf.-90.2%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CBAT vs TSLA vs CHPT vs BLNK vs EVGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$1.61T
5Y Perf.+126.4%
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$135M
5Y Perf.-99.1%
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
Engineering & Construction
Market Cap$97M
5Y Perf.-96.7%
EVGO
EVgo, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$618M
5Y Perf.-80.2%
CBAT vs TSLA vs CHPT vs BLNK vs EVGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CBAT | TSLA | CHPT | BLNK | EVGO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Auto - Manufacturers | Specialty Retail | Engineering & Construction | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $71M | $1.61T | $135M | $97M | $618M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $162M | $97.88B | $411M | $106M | $418M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $3.88B | $-220M | $-126M | $-47M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 19.1% | 30.5% | 26.0% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | 5.0% | -51.1% | -119.5% | -26.3% |
| Forward P/E | 6.1x | 221.3x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $30M | $8.38B | $272M | $11M | $107M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $16.51B | $142M | $42M | $151M |
CBAT vs TSLA vs CHPT vs BLNK vs EVGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CBAT
TSLA
CHPT
BLNK
EVGO
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CBAK Energy Technol… (CBAT) | 100 | 9.8 | -90.2% |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | 100 | 226.4 | +126.4% |
| ChargePoint Holding… (CHPT) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
| EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) | 100 | 19.8 | -80.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBAT vs TSLA vs CHPT vs BLNK vs EVGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TSLA leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. EVGO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
The Income Pick
CBAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.01
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.01 vs BLNK's 3.11
Best for: income & stability
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
TSLA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 29.7% 10Y total return vs CBAT's -69.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.04, Low D/E 10.1%, current ratio 2.16x
- Beta 2.04, current ratio 2.16x
- 4.0% margin vs BLNK's -118.7%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick
CHPT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
The Industrials Pick
Among these 5 stocks, BLNK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: industrials exposure
EVGO
EVgo, Inc.
The Growth Play
EVGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 91.6%
- 49.6% revenue growth vs CBAT's -13.6%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EVGO | 49.6% revenue growth vs CBAT's -13.6% |
| Value | CBAT | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | TSLA | 4.0% margin vs BLNK's -118.7% |
| Stability / Safety | CBAT | Beta 1.01 vs BLNK's 3.11 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TSLA | +50.4% vs EVGO's -48.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TSLA | 2.9% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 4.5% vs -109.7% |
CBAT vs TSLA vs CHPT vs BLNK vs EVGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2024
FY 2025
CBAT vs TSLA vs CHPT vs BLNK vs EVGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTSLALAGGINGEVGO
Who Leads Where
TSLA leads in 3 of 6 categories
CBAT leads 1 • CHPT leads 0 • BLNK leads 0 • EVGO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓EVGOEVgo, Inc.
0leads
BLNKBlink Charging Co.
0leads
CHPTChargePoint Holdings,…
0leads
CBATCBAK Energy Technolog…
1leads
TSLATesla, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CBATvs CHPTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TSLA3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CBAT3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TSLA4/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TSLA5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSLA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.9B annually — 920.3x BLNK's $106M. TSLA is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLNK's -118.7%. On growth, EVGO holds the edge at +45.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CBATCBAK Energy Techn… | TSLATesla, Inc. | CHPTChargePoint Holdi… | BLNKBlink Charging Co. | EVGOEVgo, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $162M | $97.9B | $411M | $106M | $418M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $9.5B | -$180M | -$115M | -$39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $3.9B | -$220M | -$126M | -$47M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $7.0B | -$67M | -$47M | -$165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +19.1% | +30.5% | +26.0% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | +5.0% | -51.1% | -119.5% | -26.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +4.0% | -53.5% | -118.7% | -11.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +7.2% | -16.3% | -44.5% | -39.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.5% | +15.8% | +7.3% | +11.7% | +45.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.9% | +28.8% | +99.9% | -66.7% |
TSLA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CBAT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, CBAT trades at a 98% valuation discount to TSLA's 396.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CBAT's 5.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TSLA's 152.2x.
| Metric | CBATCBAK Energy Techn… | TSLATesla, Inc. | CHPTChargePoint Holdi… | BLNKBlink Charging Co. | EVGOEVgo, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $71M | $1.61T | $135M | $97M | $618M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $94M | $1.60T | $265M | $66M | $574M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.08x | 396.56x | -0.66x | -0.43x | -6.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 221.32x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 10.23x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.25x | 152.24x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | 16.95x | 0.33x | 0.78x | 1.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.59x | 18.23x | 6.86x | 0.72x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.15x | 258.38x | — | — | — |
CBAT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA delivers a 4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CHPT. BLNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHPT's 12.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBAT scores 7/9 vs BLNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CBATCBAK Energy Techn… | TSLATesla, Inc. | CHPTChargePoint Holdi… | BLNKBlink Charging Co. | EVGOEVgo, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.5% | +4.8% | -3.5% | -131.9% | -12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.0% | +2.9% | -25.8% | -66.7% | -5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +4.5% | -83.8% | -109.7% | -21.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +4.4% | -41.6% | -77.3% | -14.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.10x | 12.75x | 0.09x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23M | -$8.1B | $130M | -$31M | -$44M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $16.5B | $142M | $42M | $151M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $8.4B | $272M | $11M | $107M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -24.86x | 17.04x | -8.58x | -9064.60x | -11.79x |
TSLA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSLA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSLA five years ago would be worth $20,426 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $146 for CHPT. Over the past 12 months, TSLA leads with a +50.4% total return vs EVGO's -48.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSLA at 35.6% vs CHPT's -67.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CBATCBAK Energy Techn… | TSLATesla, Inc. | CHPTChargePoint Holdi… | BLNKBlink Charging Co. | EVGOEVgo, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.1% | -2.2% | -11.4% | +14.2% | -36.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.1% | +50.4% | -48.2% | +1.0% | -48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.6% | +149.3% | -96.6% | -88.1% | -69.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.7% | +104.3% | -98.5% | -97.2% | -82.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.7% | +2974.6% | -96.8% | -97.3% | -79.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.9% | +35.6% | -67.5% | -50.9% | -32.6% |
TSLA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CBAT and TSLA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBAT is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 3.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSLA currently trades 85.9% from its 52-week high vs BLNK's 31.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CBATCBAK Energy Techn… | TSLATesla, Inc. | CHPTChargePoint Holdi… | BLNKBlink Charging Co. | EVGOEVgo, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 2.04x | 2.64x | 3.11x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.25 | $498.83 | $17.78 | $2.65 | $5.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.77 | $273.21 | $4.45 | $0.45 | $1.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.2% | +85.9% | +35.1% | +31.9% | +38.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.4 | 64.6 | 49.9 | 58.0 | 38.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 110K | 61.8M | 479K | 2.2M | 4.5M |
Evenly matched — CBAT and TSLA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TSLA as "Hold", CHPT as "Hold", EVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 166.5% upside for EVGO (target: $5) vs 5.2% for TSLA (target: $450).
| Metric | CBATCBAK Energy Techn… | TSLATesla, Inc. | CHPTChargePoint Holdi… | BLNKBlink Charging Co. | EVGOEVgo, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $450.45 | $7.50 | — | $5.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 81 | 21 | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TSLA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CBAT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallTesla, Inc. (TSLA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CBAT vs TSLA vs CHPT vs BLNK vs EVGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBAT or TSLA or CHPT or BLNK or EVGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EVgo, Inc.
(EVGO) is the stronger pick with 49. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 6% for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT). CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBAT or TSLA or CHPT or BLNK or EVGO?
On trailing P/E, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the cheapest at 6. 1x versus Tesla, Inc. at 396. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBAT or TSLA or CHPT or BLNK or EVGO?
Over the past 5 years, Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) delivered a total return of +104. 3%, compared to -98. 5% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLA returned +29. 7% versus BLNK's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBAT or TSLA or CHPT or BLNK or EVGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 3. 11β — meaning BLNK is approximately 209% more volatile than CBAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 13% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBAT or TSLA or CHPT or BLNK or EVGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVgo, Inc.
(EVGO) is pulling ahead at 49. 6% versus -13. 6% for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. grew EPS 574. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Tesla, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVGO leads at 91. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBAT or TSLA or CHPT or BLNK or EVGO?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 7% net margin versus -159. 2% for Blink Charging Co. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBAT leads at 5. 0% versus -160. 6% for BLNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLNK leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBAT or TSLA or CHPT or BLNK or EVGO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVGO: 166.
5% to $5. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBAT or TSLA or CHPT or BLNK or EVGO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CBAT or TSLA or CHPT or BLNK or EVGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01)). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBAT: -69. 7%, BLNK: -97. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBAT and TSLA and CHPT and BLNK and EVGO?
These companies operate in different sectors (CBAT (Industrials) and TSLA (Consumer Cyclical) and CHPT (Consumer Cyclical) and BLNK (Industrials) and EVGO (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CBAT is a small-cap deep-value stock; TSLA is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVGO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CBAT: 36.5% · TSLA: 15.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CBAT: 6.1x · TSLA: 396.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.