Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CBFV vs FXNC vs NKSH vs CZWI vs CFFI vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
CBFV vs FXNC vs NKSH vs CZWI vs CFFI vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $190M | $273M | $231M | $207M | $251M | $355.61B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $69M | $115M | $85M | $90M | $184M | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $18M | $16M | $14M | $27M | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 62.5% | 74.7% | 65.1% | 54.7% | 69.1% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 19.0% | 22.5% | 7.0% | 18.0% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 12.8x | 11.3x | 11.8x | 7.5x | 25.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $43M | $2M | $52M | $116M | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $161M | $8M | $119M | $14M | $10.27B | $343.34B |
CBFV vs FXNC vs NKSH vs CZWI vs CFFI vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CB Financial Servic… (CBFV) | 100 | 171.9 | +71.9% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 217.5 | +117.5% |
| National Bankshares… (NKSH) | 100 | 127.0 | +27.0% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| C&F Financial Corpo… (CFFI) | 100 | 232.2 | +132.2% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBFV vs FXNC vs NKSH vs CZWI vs CFFI vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBFV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.41, yield 2.6%
- Beta 0.41 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
FXNC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CBFV's -13.3%
- +57.8% vs KO's +17.2%
NKSH is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.73, yield 4.2%, current ratio 1203.84x
- 4.2% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
CFFI is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.8% vs JPM's 2.2%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.16 vs 2.26
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs CBFV's 7.1%
- 13.1% ROA vs CBFV's 0.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.1%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs FXNC's 258.5%
- PEG 0.81 vs FXNC's 8.59
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CBFV's -13.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.16 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CBFV's 7.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.8% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CBFV's 0.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.1% |
CBFV vs FXNC vs NKSH vs CZWI vs CFFI vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CBFV vs FXNC vs NKSH vs CZWI vs CFFI vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CFFI leads in 1 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • CBFV leads 0 • FXNC leads 0 • NKSH leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FXNC and KO each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 4083.7x CBFV's $69M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBFV's 7.1%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $69M | $115M | $85M | $90M | $184M | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $25M | $20M | $9M | $36M | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $18M | $16M | $14M | $27M | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $21M | $17M | $11M | $22M | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.5% | +74.7% | +65.1% | +54.7% | +69.1% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +19.0% | +22.5% | +7.0% | +18.0% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +15.4% | +18.6% | +16.0% | +14.6% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +18.2% | +20.5% | +12.4% | +11.9% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.5% | +7.1% | +91.7% | +63.0% | +10.7% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CFFI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CFFI trades at a 77% valuation discount to CBFV's 40.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs NKSH's 140.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $190M | $273M | $231M | $207M | $251M | $355.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $193M | $155M | $225M | $140M | $354M | $390.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 40.78x | 15.40x | 14.59x | 14.70x | 9.31x | 27.18x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.62x | 12.82x | 11.28x | 11.79x | 7.49x | 25.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 10.32x | 140.16x | 2.90x | 1.44x | 2.43x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.19x | 7.05x | 11.74x | 15.69x | 10.69x | 26.39x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.77x | 2.43x | 2.71x | 2.29x | 1.35x | 7.42x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 1.46x | 1.25x | 1.11x | 0.95x | 10.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.09x | 12.99x | 15.27x | 19.90x | 11.34x | 67.15x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $3 for CBFV. NKSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NKSH scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +10.0% | +9.0% | +7.8% | +10.8% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +0.9% | +0.9% | +0.8% | +1.0% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +7.7% | +8.4% | +2.0% | +6.8% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +9.9% | +1.9% | +0.6% | +2.1% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.23x | 0.01x | 0.28x | 0.44x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$118M | -$6M | -$67M | $102M | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $161M | $8M | $119M | $14M | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $43M | $2M | $52M | $116M | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | 0.84x | 0.64x | 0.16x | 0.73x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FXNC and CZWI and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,431 for NKSH. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +57.8% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs NKSH's 11.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.8% | +24.4% | +12.3% | +24.3% | +9.9% | +20.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.6% | +57.8% | +42.4% | +52.1% | +21.7% | +17.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.8% | +103.7% | +37.2% | +153.7% | +46.4% | +47.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.7% | +71.0% | +24.3% | +69.0% | +68.4% | +65.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.0% | +258.5% | +54.9% | +149.0% | +118.6% | +121.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +26.8% | +11.1% | +36.4% | +13.5% | +13.7% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FXNC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FXNC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs NKSH's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.41x | 0.52x | 0.73x | 0.50x | 0.55x | -0.20x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.92 | $30.51 | $40.00 | $22.62 | $80.99 | $84.04 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.11 | $18.31 | $24.74 | $12.83 | $57.09 | $65.35 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.9% | +99.0% | +90.8% | +94.9% | +95.3% | +98.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.1 | 67.0 | 55.1 | 51.2 | 58.0 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 79K | 49K | 41K | 4K | 12.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NKSH and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CBFV as "Hold", FXNC as "Buy", NKSH as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -30.4% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, NKSH offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.00 | — | — | — | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | — | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.0% | +4.2% | +1.7% | +2.4% | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $0.61 | $1.51 | $0.37 | $1.84 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +3.0% | +0.4% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
CFFI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
CBFV vs FXNC vs NKSH vs CZWI vs CFFI vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBFV or FXNC or NKSH or CZWI or CFFI or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First National Corporation (FXNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBFV or FXNC or NKSH or CZWI or CFFI or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the cheapest at 9.
3x versus CB Financial Services, Inc. at 40. 8x. On forward P/E, C&F Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 140. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBFV or FXNC or NKSH or CZWI or CFFI or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +24. 3% for National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus NKSH's +54. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBFV or FXNC or NKSH or CZWI or CFFI or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBFV or FXNC or NKSH or CZWI or CFFI or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: National Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 100. 8% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBFV or FXNC or NKSH or CZWI or CFFI or KO or JPM?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 7. 1% for CB Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBFV or FXNC or NKSH or CZWI or CFFI or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 140. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 17. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBFV or FXNC or NKSH or CZWI or CFFI or KO or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is CBFV or FXNC or NKSH or CZWI or CFFI or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NKSH: +54. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBFV and FXNC and NKSH and CZWI and CFFI and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (CBFV (Financial Services) and FXNC (Financial Services) and NKSH (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and CFFI (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CBFV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKSH is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CFFI is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.