Banks
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CBK vs SFNC vs HOMB vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
CBK vs SFNC vs HOMB vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $422M | $3.27B | $5.58B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $129M | $618M | $1.37B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $-398M | $475M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 69.8% | 4.5% | 77.3% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 37.5% | -85.4% | 43.8% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 10.9x | 11.5x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $167M | $641M | $935M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $380M | $667M | $343.34B |
CBK vs SFNC vs HOMB vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 131.6 | +31.6% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 183.7 | +83.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBK vs SFNC vs HOMB vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 58.5%, current ratio 0.14x
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 11.5x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
SFNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.8%, current ratio 0.86x
- 3.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%
- +23.0% vs HOMB's +3.0%
HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
- NIM 3.8% vs JPM's 2.2%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs HOMB's 57.7%
- PEG 0.81 vs HOMB's 0.87
- 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.0% vs HOMB's +3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
CBK vs SFNC vs HOMB vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CBK vs SFNC vs HOMB vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories
SFNC leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • CBK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2170.6x CBK's $129M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 34.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -64.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $129M | $618M | $1.4B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | -$444M | $618M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | -$398M | $475M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $37M | $410M | $311M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.8% | +4.5% | +77.3% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | -85.4% | +43.8% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | -64.3% | +34.6% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +66.4% | +22.6% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | +42.1% | +26.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, CBK trades at a 34% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 0.89x vs JPM's 0.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $422M | $3.3B | $5.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $589M | $3.5B | $5.9B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.54x | -7.63x | 11.72x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.51x | 10.90x | 11.47x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.89x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.88x | — | 9.47x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 5.21x | 4.06x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 0.89x | 1.30x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.97x | 7.73x | 11.58x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOMB scores 6/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.3% | -11.5% | +11.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | -1.6% | +2.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | -9.1% | +8.7% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | -4.2% | +11.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.19x | 0.22x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $167M | $261M | $268M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $380M | $667M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $167M | $641M | $935M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.25x | -1.01x | 1.47x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,847 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, SFNC leads with a +23.0% total return vs HOMB's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs CBK's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.6% | +20.7% | +2.7% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.6% | +23.0% | +3.0% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +37.1% | +31.2% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | -11.5% | +22.1% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +26.2% | +57.7% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | +11.1% | +9.5% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CBK and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.89x | 0.66x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.67 | $22.62 | $30.83 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.32 | $17.00 | $25.50 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +99.5% | +91.6% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.3 | 63.7 | 63.7 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 1.1M | 1.4M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SFNC as "Buy", HOMB as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.5% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs 2.2% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.79% vs CBK's 0.47%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $23.00 | $31.50 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 19 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +3.8% | +2.8% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 | 15 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | $0.85 | $0.80 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +1.5% | +3.9% |
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CBK vs SFNC vs HOMB vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBK or SFNC or HOMB or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock (CBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBK or SFNC or HOMB or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.
Common Stock (CBK) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 87x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBK or SFNC or HOMB or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -11. 5% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CBK's +21. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBK or SFNC or HOMB or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.
Common Stock (CBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 88% more volatile than CBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBK or SFNC or HOMB or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 19. 9% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBK or SFNC or HOMB or JPM?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 6% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 34. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 43. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOMB leads at 77. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBK or SFNC or HOMB or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 87x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock (CBK) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 11. 5% to $31. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBK or SFNC or HOMB or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 0. 5% for Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock (CBK).
09Is CBK or SFNC or HOMB or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, CBK: +21. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBK and SFNC and HOMB and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. SFNC, HOMB, JPM pay a dividend while CBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.