Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CBUS vs APLD vs PGEN vs BTBT vs MARA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CBUS
Cibus, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$686M
5Y Perf.-93.2%
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.89B
5Y Perf.+1136.0%
PGEN
Precigen, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.22B
5Y Perf.+212.0%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-9.9%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.-18.6%

CBUS vs APLD vs PGEN vs BTBT vs MARA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CBUS logoCBUS
APLD logoAPLD
PGEN logoPGEN
BTBT logoBTBT
MARA logoMARA
IndustryBiotechnologyInformation Technology ServicesBiotechnologyFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$686M$11.89B$1.22B$589M$4.83B
Revenue (TTM)$4M$282M$6M$164M$907M
Net Income (TTM)$-127M$-123M$-247M$137M$-1.31B
Gross Margin23.9%16.4%23.0%61.9%-47.7%
Operating Margin-26.8%-31.5%-18.6%16.8%-90.6%
Forward P/E9.2x
Total Debt$33M$703M$6M$14M$3.65B
Cash & Equiv.$10M$114M$30M$95M$547M

CBUS vs APLD vs PGEN vs BTBT vs MARALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CBUS
APLD
PGEN
BTBT
MARA
StockApr 22May 26Return
Cibus, Inc. (CBUS)1006.8-93.2%
Applied Digital Cor… (APLD)1001236.0+1136.0%
Precigen, Inc. (PGEN)100312.0+212.0%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10090.1-9.9%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)10081.4-18.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CBUS vs APLD vs PGEN vs BTBT vs MARA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Applied Digital Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. PGEN also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CBUS
Cibus, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

CBUS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

APLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 7.6% 10Y total return vs MARA's -51.6%
  • 0.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
  • +6.9% vs CBUS's -40.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
PGEN
Precigen, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PGEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 4.76x
  • Beta 1.44 vs BTBT's 3.37
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 3.37, yield 0.3%
  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • Beta 3.37, yield 0.3%, current ratio 5.39x
  • NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, MARA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs PGEN's -36.9%
ValueBTBT logoBTBTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs PGEN's -39.1%
Stability / SafetyPGEN logoPGENBeta 1.44 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsAPLD logoAPLD0.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)APLD logoAPLD+6.9% vs CBUS's -40.0%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs PGEN's -144.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -152.8%

CBUS vs APLD vs PGEN vs BTBT vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CBUSCibus, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$4M
APLDApplied Digital Corporation
FY 2022
Mining Segment
100.0%$51,000
PGENPrecigen, Inc.
FY 2024
Exemplar Segment
100.0%$4M
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M

CBUS vs APLD vs PGEN vs BTBT vs MARA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBTBTLAGGINGMARA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 249.3x CBUS's $4M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PGEN's -39.1%. On growth, PGEN holds the edge at +2.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCBUS logoCBUSCibus, Inc.APLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…PGEN logoPGENPrecigen, Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4M$282M$6M$164M$907M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$92M-$53M-$115M$166M$627M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$127M-$123M-$247M$137M-$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$51M-$1.3B-$76M-$448M-$312M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+23.9%+16.4%+23.0%+61.9%-47.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-26.8%-31.5%-18.6%+16.8%-90.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-34.9%-43.5%-39.1%+17.3%-144.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-14.1%-4.8%-12.0%-65.3%-34.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-12.8%+98.2%+2.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+55.2%+89.4%-11.7%+2.8%-4.8%
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APLD's 1099.7x.

MetricCBUS logoCBUSCibus, Inc.APLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…PGEN logoPGENPrecigen, Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Market CapShares × price$686M$11.9B$1.2B$589M$4.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$709M$12.5B$1.2B$508M$7.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.54x-35.80x-8.83x9.15x-3.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1099.67x8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue188.61x55.16x309.66x3.60x5.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share31.44x13.18x28.85x0.56x1.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PGEN. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CBUS's 1.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs CBUS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCBUS logoCBUSCibus, Inc.APLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…PGEN logoPGENPrecigen, Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.3%-6.2%-5.9%+21.4%-30.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-38.6%-2.3%-144.1%+19.0%-17.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-61.5%-7.3%-152.8%+6.5%-9.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-21.8%-9.5%-107.2%+8.5%-12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–923363
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.51x1.11x0.14x0.03x1.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$23M$589M-$24M-$81M$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$10M$114M$30M$95M$547M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$33M$703M$6M$14M$3.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.49x-2.01x-273.83x4.73x
BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

APLD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in APLD five years ago would be worth $85,629 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $69 for CBUS. Over the past 12 months, APLD leads with a +691.0% total return vs CBUS's -40.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APLD at 130.5% vs CBUS's -54.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCBUS logoCBUSCibus, Inc.APLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…PGEN logoPGENPrecigen, Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-20.2%+47.7%-3.0%-10.3%+28.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-40.0%+691.0%+207.4%-9.0%-4.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.5%+1125.1%+232.0%-19.7%+36.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.3%+756.3%-36.5%-84.6%-59.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%+756.3%-84.6%-60.4%-51.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-54.4%+130.5%+49.2%-7.1%+10.8%
APLD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — APLD and PGEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PGEN is the less volatile stock with a 1.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APLD currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs CBUS's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCBUS logoCBUSCibus, Inc.APLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…PGEN logoPGENPrecigen, Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.12x3.23x1.44x3.37x3.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.19$44.22$5.23$4.55$23.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.09$5.09$1.23$1.25$6.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+35.8%+93.9%+79.3%+40.2%+54.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.874.462.769.169.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded603K20.3M4.3M18.5M47.6M
Evenly matched — APLD and PGEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CBUS and APLD and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CBUS as "Buy", APLD as "Buy", PGEN as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 666.7% upside for CBUS (target: $12) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCBUS logoCBUSCibus, Inc.APLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…PGEN logoPGENPrecigen, Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$11.50$61.00$6.00$5.00$16.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts41316219
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises110
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.3%0.0%0.0%+1.0%
Evenly matched — CBUS and APLD and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). APLD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallBit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CBUS vs APLD vs PGEN vs BTBT vs MARA: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CBUS or APLD or PGEN or BTBT or MARA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 9% for Precigen, Inc. (PGEN). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — CBUS or APLD or PGEN or BTBT or MARA?

Over the past 5 years, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) delivered a total return of +756.

3%, compared to -99. 3% for Cibus, Inc. (CBUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APLD returned +756. 3% versus CBUS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — CBUS or APLD or PGEN or BTBT or MARA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Precigen, Inc.

(PGEN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 44β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 134% more volatile than PGEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 151% for Cibus, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — CBUS or APLD or PGEN or BTBT or MARA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -36. 9% for Precigen, Inc. (PGEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APLD leads at 193. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — CBUS or APLD or PGEN or BTBT or MARA?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -34. 9% for Cibus, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -34. 4% for PGEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — CBUS or APLD or PGEN or BTBT or MARA?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. CBUS, APLD, PGEN, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is CBUS or APLD or PGEN or BTBT or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+756.

3% 10Y return). Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) carries a higher beta of 3. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APLD: +756. 3%, CBUS: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between CBUS and APLD and PGEN and BTBT and MARA?

These companies operate in different sectors (CBUS (Healthcare) and APLD (Technology) and PGEN (Healthcare) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CBUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APLD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CBUS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 49%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PGEN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 103%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CBUS and APLD and PGEN and BTBT and MARA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CBUS: -12.8% · APLD: 98.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.